... wrote on Jul 25
th, 2017 at 7:01pm:
Gee, i wonder what greggerys plan is.
Maybe it goes something like "it says TEEN vogue, not Pre teen vogue". Its stretching the plausibility of plausible deniability, but thats what it is nonetheless. Hes either ignorant or pretending he is of the fact young girls always like to yhink theyre more mature than their years. If theyre preteen they go for teen things. If theyre teens, they go for adult things.
Then if hes done his homework, hell state that the average age of teen vogue is late 20s, and will imply this means its targetted at people in their late 20s, rather than use his brain and consider this average is made up of pre/teens and their mothers who buy it for them. Roughly age 12 + age 45 and youve got an average in the late 20s. This magazine is marketted for tweens and early teens, no doubt about it.
So then youd ask why the routine? Why is he so interested in running interference for people who peddle this material to people below the age of consent?
Is it because hes a paedo? Its certainly possible, the idea has been raised before, but i think its just that hes a nihilist. He just doesnt care about anything, least of all future generations. If any of you care, this influence should be raising your eyebrows.
"Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?"
If you had taken the time to learn what the word "targeting" means (as well as taking the time to learn how to spell it), you wouldn't be in the mess you're in now.
I read my dad's Playboys when I was 10, but the magazine wasn't
targeted at me.
Oh well, it's been a good lesson for you.
So, is someone targeting preteens with articles about anal?
You didn't say.