Brian Ross
|
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 24 th, 2017 at 6:39pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 24 th, 2017 at 6:37pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 24 th, 2017 at 6:29pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 24 th, 2017 at 6:22pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 24 th, 2017 at 6:21pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 24 th, 2017 at 6:19pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 24 th, 2017 at 5:38pm: At least 60,000. How do you know? The best evidence they have is from Lake Mungo which is 50,000 years. My family has been here since the 1790's and has fought and worked to build Australia. My family was fighting for Australia while John Smith's family was fighting for Mussolini. And I'll tell you something- Australia is 6 billion years old. 50,000 years is about as relevant as 200 years. Not paying attention to the latest news, are you, Hammer? The best estimate is now 65,000 years. As to your family's time here, it is a pittance compared to how long the Indigenous Australians have been here. We are all children compare to the Indigenous Australians. They have the longest, continuous culture and society in the world. As much as your ancestors have attempted to deny it, the proof is coming out. Like I said - 65,000 years is nothing compared to 6 billion years. Tell us when you find your 6 billion year old human, Hammer. Otherwise, piss off back to the UK where your ancestors came from. You're an original boat person, you realise? Tsk, tsk. Why are your abos so important to a land which built itself without humans muppet? Australia doesn't need abos as much as it needs any human. Custodians?? What rubbish. http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpgOh, dearie, dearie, me. 65k years versus 200? Tsk, tsk, run along Hammer, you've been shown up for the fool you really are...again. 65,000 year old Indian migrants next to 6 billion years of evolution . Who cares!!! Tsk tsk.... Oh, dearie, dearie, me. 65k years versus 200? Tsk, tsk, run along Hammer, you've been shown up for the fool you really are...again.
|