Grendel wrote on Jul 22
nd, 2017 at 2:20pm:
donincognito wrote on Jul 22
nd, 2017 at 1:46pm:
Grendel wrote on Jul 21
st, 2017 at 3:25pm:
No its not.... there were male and female Time Lords... not sex changing Time Lords.
No, you are wrong.
Nope.... The sex change thing in that episode was the setting up for this current change by LW PC writers, who let their politics interfere in every aspect of their life, and now ours. Just name 1 Time Lord from the past that changed sex. There was no need for them to change sex. In that respect they were like humans. Life would have become very complicated for them otherwise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
So no I am not wrong. No, you are wrong.
http://www.doctorwho.tv/whats-new/article/the-changing-genders-in-and-of-doctor-who/
You clutching to the past is highly amusing when juxtaposed against a show predicated on continual change.
Im also amused that you think hyper intelligent beings who can control time and waltz around in spaceships powered by a literal sun and who can play with radiation like we play with lego would be worried about what gender they currently are.
reminder
Quote:“We're the most civilised civilisation in the universe. We're billions of years beyond your petty human obsession with gender and its associated stereotypes.”
Quote: Quote:The sex change crap came in with Missy/Master due to PC Prog writers, who should have been locked away.
Nope, still wrong. One of the original creators of Dr Who said there should be a female Doctor.
So what some LW PC pleb has an opinion. You are calling Sydney Newman, one of the integral people in creating Doctor Who, a pleb? Im pretty sure that I trust him more than I trust some tory buggerwit, given he helped create the show.
Quote: Quote: Quote:For all his reincarnations the Dr has been male. If it was possible and going to happen surely it would have before he ran out of reincarnations eh.
No necessarily. If the odds are 50/50 (and given how its inferred that time lords can control some aspects of their regeneration its not certain that those are the odds) then its highly unlikely you would get a string of 12 males in a row, but its by no means impossible.
Oh puhlease now you are really grasping at straws. No, its basic probibility. If the odds are 50/50 for any given two events, say flipping a coin, the the chances are exactly the same for each given event. However, the chances of a set number of the same events happening in a row gets lower and lower with each passing event. I understand that this is beyond what you can comprehend, so you can either trust me that im correct, or go and do some research for yourself and work out independently that im correct. But we both know you arent going to do either, and instead are going to complain and moan and whine and come up with some other bullshit in order to mask the fact that deep down you are sad little man with a sad little brain.