Australian Politics Forum - Hanson on Autistic kids

mothra

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #345 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:13pm

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:11pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:00pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:41pm:

Nobody has suggested that severely disabled children attend regular school.

Calm your farm.

Never actually said 'severely', nice try. Grin

I am saying that disabled or useless enough to cause disruption and produce poor outcomes for the other students.

Not to difficult to comprehend is it?

It wasn't that long ago the all students were separated based on ability, saves wasting everyone times with those who just don't 'cut the mustard'

You are what you are, and just because you have high self esteem doesn't mean you're not thick as pig sh1t.

The old ways produced bad outcomes for everyone, including many in this thread who clearly have no empathy towards the otherly-abled because they have probably never spent any quality time with them as peers.

A great many people with disabilities are neither disruptive or "thick as pig sh1t".

Then they are NOT the ones Im talking about OBVIOUSLY.

Is english not your first or even your second fkking language?

Keeping the stupid disruptive kids away from the smart focused kids is a dumb outcome how exactly?

Prevents them from becoming super best friends forever. Grin

Which "stupid" and disruptive kids would you keep away?

Where is this line drawn?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

UnSubRocky Gold Member Offline Australian Legend Posts: 21740 Rockhampton, Q Gender:	Re: Hanson on Autistic kids Reply #346 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:18pm miketrees wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 9:48am: we need to include children with disability in regular classrooms Sounds like you never had kids Inclusiveness in classrooms must have been well before your time.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 131540 Gender:	Re: Hanson on Autistic kids Reply #347 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:18pm If only we could have a 'special' forum for BigHole. He really is quite disruptive.
Back to top	IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #348 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:29pm

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:13pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:11pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:00pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:41pm:

Nobody has suggested that severely disabled children attend regular school.

Calm your farm.

Never actually said 'severely', nice try. Grin

I am saying that disabled or useless enough to cause disruption and produce poor outcomes for the other students.

Not to difficult to comprehend is it?

It wasn't that long ago the all students were separated based on ability, saves wasting everyone times with those who just don't 'cut the mustard'

You are what you are, and just because you have high self esteem doesn't mean you're not thick as pig sh1t.

The old ways produced bad outcomes for everyone, including many in this thread who clearly have no empathy towards the otherly-abled because they have probably never spent any quality time with them as peers.

A great many people with disabilities are neither disruptive or "thick as pig sh1t".

Then they are NOT the ones Im talking about OBVIOUSLY.

Is english not your first or even your second fkking language?

Keeping the stupid disruptive kids away from the smart focused kids is a dumb outcome how exactly?

Prevents them from becoming super best friends forever. Grin

Which "stupid" and disruptive kids would you keep away?

Where is this line drawn?

From the smart kids, all of them.

That is why special schools existed and should continue to exist.

Welcome to real life kids!

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #349 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:32pm

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:29pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:13pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:11pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:00pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:41pm:

Nobody has suggested that severely disabled children attend regular school.

Calm your farm.

Never actually said 'severely', nice try. Grin

I am saying that disabled or useless enough to cause disruption and produce poor outcomes for the other students.

Not to difficult to comprehend is it?

It wasn't that long ago the all students were separated based on ability, saves wasting everyone times with those who just don't 'cut the mustard'

You are what you are, and just because you have high self esteem doesn't mean you're not thick as pig sh1t.

The old ways produced bad outcomes for everyone, including many in this thread who clearly have no empathy towards the otherly-abled because they have probably never spent any quality time with them as peers.

A great many people with disabilities are neither disruptive or "thick as pig sh1t".

Then they are NOT the ones Im talking about OBVIOUSLY.

Is english not your first or even your second fkking language?

Keeping the stupid disruptive kids away from the smart focused kids is a dumb outcome how exactly?

Prevents them from becoming super best friends forever. Grin

Which "stupid" and disruptive kids would you keep away?

Where is this line drawn?

From the smart kids, all of them.

That is why special schools existed and should continue to exist.

Welcome to real life kids!

All children have unique needs, BigOl. All learn at different paces, some in different ways. Some are good at some things and struggle with others. It's a teacher's job to accommodate them.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

BigOl64 Gold Member Offline Posts: 14438 Townsville QLD Gender:	Re: Hanson on Autistic kids Reply #350 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:34pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:18pm: If only we could have a 'special' forum for BigHole. He really is quite disruptive. You were never placed in the advanced class were you. That is as basic as it get you fkken dullard.
Back to top	IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19627
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #351 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:43pm

Special needs schools are not available in many areas....Most special needs schools that are available are for the severely disabled who require special care....We have a Politician telling parents it is better for the State to legislate and decide what is best for their child....Hanson is a dickhead!!!

Angry

In the state of nature...all men are born equal, but they cannot continue in this equality. Society makes them lose it, and they recover it only by the protection of the law.
Charles de Montesquieu (1689 - 1755)

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #352 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:50pm

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:32pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:29pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:13pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:11pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:00pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:41pm:

Nobody has suggested that severely disabled children attend regular school.

Calm your farm.

Never actually said 'severely', nice try. Grin

I am saying that disabled or useless enough to cause disruption and produce poor outcomes for the other students.

Not to difficult to comprehend is it?

It wasn't that long ago the all students were separated based on ability, saves wasting everyone times with those who just don't 'cut the mustard'

You are what you are, and just because you have high self esteem doesn't mean you're not thick as pig sh1t.

The old ways produced bad outcomes for everyone, including many in this thread who clearly have no empathy towards the otherly-abled because they have probably never spent any quality time with them as peers.

A great many people with disabilities are neither disruptive or "thick as pig sh1t".

Then they are NOT the ones Im talking about OBVIOUSLY.

Is english not your first or even your second fkking language?

Keeping the stupid disruptive kids away from the smart focused kids is a dumb outcome how exactly?

Prevents them from becoming super best friends forever. Grin

Which "stupid" and disruptive kids would you keep away?

Where is this line drawn?

From the smart kids, all of them.

That is why special schools existed and should continue to exist.

Welcome to real life kids!

All children have unique needs, BigOl. All learn at different paces, some in different ways. Some are good at some things and struggle with others. It's a teacher's job to accommodate them.

Absolutely, so long as they do NOT disrupt the learning of the smart kids that can do what ever the fkk they want in their own class room with the rest of the special needs kids.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 34535 Gender:	Re: Hanson on Autistic kids Reply #353 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:53pm I think you will find that there are few children who are not smart n some way or another, or who don't struggle in one way or another. There's no such thing as "smart kids and dumb kids". There is just a spectrum of kids. All of who deserve both an education in academia and an education in social inclusion.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #354 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:07pm

mothra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:04pm:

Cods you have been insulting me all thread and joining in with other people insulting me.

Are you surprised i eventually told you to get bent?

So typically, you're now playing the victim.

Never take responsibility for your own behaviour, do you.

show me where I have said anything close to what you have said....... I dont think I have even spoken to you on this thread..

I am here because it was started by gordon not yourself..

give me the evidence where I have spoken to you like you have spoken to me ... on this thread...

I can and I will go back through it but you seem to have more on me than I on you.. so just tell me the numbers of the replies where I have abused you and called you an OLD WOMEN ..

I am not fighting for anyone else here like you are now claiming..

insulting others like whom???.. are they people who havent first insulted me?? by any chance..?

just lets keep this between you and me mothra....you have a lot to say about me and my behavior...

so lets get it out in the opn as its this thread YOU are talking about lets keep it here....

so that way it wont be too hard for either of us...

what have I said to you on this thread that is INSULTING like what you have said to ME?..

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #355 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:08pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:12pm:

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 4:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:46pm:

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 3:43pm:

For an old woman, you sure are childish

at least I am not RUDE.. Angry

if thats the best you have then dont bother..

at least I answered you..

I was going to say you are RUDE when people dont agree with your command..

so you dismiss them with a comment like

have you read the OP.. Sad

..but I didnt want to come down to your level..

so now its OLD WOMEN>.

nice one..

that will be even harder to beat....should I ever feel like stooping that low..

you and someone else on here have pretty low standards when it comes to debateing...btw mothra..

when I make a post its never to you unless stated...

so there really is no need for your nasty replies..

save them for all the others....

Are you a young man, cods?

what is that comment meant to be?

A simple question.

You object to being called an old woman.

However, I was under the impression that you were:

a) elderly

b) female

If so, wouldn't that make you an old woman?

Perhaps I'm wrong though: maybe you're a young man.

thanks greg thank you very much...

Back to top

IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: Hanson on Autistic kids Reply #356 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm greg did you like being called a RAPIST......? well I dont like being called an OLD WOMEN by someone like mothra.. or for that matter YOU.. even you would know how demeaning that was meant to be..
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131540
Gender: male

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #357 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:34pm

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

greg did you like being called a RAPIST......?

Nope.

Because:

a) I'm not a rapist

b) Rape is illegal

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

well I dont like being called an OLD WOMEN by someone like mothra.. or for that matter YOU..

Okay, fine.

But you are an elderly woman, aren't you?

And, there's nothing wrong with being an old woman. It's perfectly legal.

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

even you would know how demeaning that was meant to be..

I can't see it myself, but I'll respect your wishes.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #358 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:42pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

greg did you like being called a RAPIST......?

Nope.

Because:

a) I'm not a rapist

b) Rape is illegal

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

well I dont like being called an OLD WOMEN by someone like mothra.. or for that matter YOU..

Okay, fine.

But you are an elderly woman, aren't you?

And, there's nothing wrong with being an old woman. It's perfectly legal.

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

even you would know how demeaning that was meant to be..

I can't see it myself, but I'll respect your wishes.

well its not too you is it???>.

why the need to comment on that aspect....if you have to comment at all...

I can only presume you agree with everything else then..

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131540
Gender: male

Re: Hanson on Autistic kids
Reply #359 - Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:49pm

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

greg did you like being called a RAPIST......?

Nope.

Because:

a) I'm not a rapist

b) Rape is illegal

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

well I dont like being called an OLD WOMEN by someone like mothra.. or for that matter YOU..

Okay, fine.

But you are an elderly woman, aren't you?

And, there's nothing wrong with being an old woman. It's perfectly legal.

cods wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2017 at 5:11pm:

even you would know how demeaning that was meant to be..

I can't see it myself, but I'll respect your wishes.

well its not too you is it???>.

why the need to comment on that aspect....if you have to comment at all...

I can only presume you agree with everything else then..

You can call me an old man.

It wouldn't bother me in the slightest.

Anyway, whatevs Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged