Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
a different perspective on human rights (Read 3975 times)
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #45 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:24pm
 
So ozzy supports stoning to death for adultery. Interesting.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #46 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:24pm
 
Secret Wars wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:18pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:08pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:05pm:
freediver wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 9:58pm:
I think Aussie has invented a new human right - the right to flee human rights abuses. That's all there is left. We can call it Aussie's "wunaway wevolution".


You could Effendi, I know, but I won't buy it.

Is it an abuse of human rights for the State to kill a murderer where that is legal in the relevant State, Effendi?


Is poofery murder or a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults?



It is a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults.

How is that relevant to the discussion which is about compliance with the Laws of a foreign State (one where we here have no say apart from futile chest beating posturing) in which you live and the consequences to you if you breach that State's Laws?


It is relevant dopey because you brought it up.   Roll Eyes

No I did not.  Effendi did with this Thread.

But, no matter.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #47 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:25pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:22pm:
Quote:
Easy, I'm anti DP in all circumstances.


So am I as I have posted a zillion times here.  But....if I am convicted in a jurisdiction where capital punishment is the consequence, I cannot credibly bleat.

Do you think I'll be spared by that jurisdiction by yelling "I am 'anti' this?"


That does not changed what you asked and what I gave an answer too. The goal posts are over here | |.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #48 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:27pm
 
rhino wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:24pm:
So ozzy supports stoning to death for adultery. Interesting.


Really?  Where did.......oops............nah........just noticed.  You did not address that to me.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20221
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #49 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:27pm
 
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:18pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:08pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:05pm:
freediver wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 9:58pm:
I think Aussie has invented a new human right - the right to flee human rights abuses. That's all there is left. We can call it Aussie's "wunaway wevolution".


You could Effendi, I know, but I won't buy it.

Is it an abuse of human rights for the State to kill a murderer where that is legal in the relevant State, Effendi?


Is poofery murder or a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults?



It is a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults.

How is that relevant to the discussion which is about compliance with the Laws of a foreign State (one where we here have no say apart from futile chest beating posturing) in which you live and the consequences to you if you breach that State's Laws?


Then rather than say they should just pack up and move, you should hold the position of those states in contempt. If all countries held poofery punishable by death, what then should they do?


Maybe set aside a sparsely populated vagina shaped island state and allow all the poofugees of the world to immigrate there.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #50 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:28pm
 
Gordon wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:27pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:18pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:08pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:05pm:
freediver wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 9:58pm:
I think Aussie has invented a new human right - the right to flee human rights abuses. That's all there is left. We can call it Aussie's "wunaway wevolution".


You could Effendi, I know, but I won't buy it.

Is it an abuse of human rights for the State to kill a murderer where that is legal in the relevant State, Effendi?


Is poofery murder or a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults?



It is a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults.

How is that relevant to the discussion which is about compliance with the Laws of a foreign State (one where we here have no say apart from futile chest beating posturing) in which you live and the consequences to you if you breach that State's Laws?


Then rather than say they should just pack up and move, you should hold the position of those states in contempt. If all countries held poofery punishable by death, what then should they do?


Maybe set aside a sparsely populated vagina shaped island state and allow all the poofugees of the world to immigrate there.


The Jews Aussie moved there might stone them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #51 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:29pm
 
Quote:
That does not changed what you asked and what I gave an answer too. The goal posts are over here | |.


Have another go at that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20221
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #52 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:30pm
 
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:28pm:
Gordon wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:27pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:18pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:08pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:05pm:
freediver wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 9:58pm:
I think Aussie has invented a new human right - the right to flee human rights abuses. That's all there is left. We can call it Aussie's "wunaway wevolution".


You could Effendi, I know, but I won't buy it.

Is it an abuse of human rights for the State to kill a murderer where that is legal in the relevant State, Effendi?


Is poofery murder or a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults?



It is a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults.

How is that relevant to the discussion which is about compliance with the Laws of a foreign State (one where we here have no say apart from futile chest beating posturing) in which you live and the consequences to you if you breach that State's Laws?


Then rather than say they should just pack up and move, you should hold the position of those states in contempt. If all countries held poofery punishable by death, what then should they do?


Maybe set aside a sparsely populated vagina shaped island state and allow all the poofugees of the world to immigrate there.


The Jews Aussie moved there might stone them.


Does Aussie want the Jews to move to tassy because he thinks they're cbunts and they should live in a place that looks like one?
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #53 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:32pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:29pm:
Quote:
That does not changed what you asked and what I gave an answer too. The goal posts are over here | |.


Have another go at that.


No need.

You asked:
Quote:
Is the extinguishment of existence a denial of 'human rights?'

Let's see how you blokes deal with that.


I dealt with it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #54 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:33pm
 
Have you blokes all lost your minds?  I know it's Sunday night and all but really......does that mean you all suffer from brain cell termination?

Quote:
The Jews Aussie moved there might stone them.


All I want moved to 'Tasmania' is the State of Israel.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #55 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:34pm
 
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:32pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:29pm:
Quote:
That does not changed what you asked and what I gave an answer too. The goal posts are over here | |.


Have another go at that.


No need.

You asked:
Quote:
Is the extinguishment of existence a denial of 'human rights?'

Let's see how you blokes deal with that.


I dealt with it.


No, you posted this gibber:

Quote:
That does not changed what you asked and what I gave an answer too. The goal posts are over here | |.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #56 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:36pm
 
Gordon wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:30pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:28pm:
Gordon wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:27pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:18pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:08pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:05pm:
freediver wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 9:58pm:
I think Aussie has invented a new human right - the right to flee human rights abuses. That's all there is left. We can call it Aussie's "wunaway wevolution".


You could Effendi, I know, but I won't buy it.

Is it an abuse of human rights for the State to kill a murderer where that is legal in the relevant State, Effendi?


Is poofery murder or a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults?



It is a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults.

How is that relevant to the discussion which is about compliance with the Laws of a foreign State (one where we here have no say apart from futile chest beating posturing) in which you live and the consequences to you if you breach that State's Laws?


Then rather than say they should just pack up and move, you should hold the position of those states in contempt. If all countries held poofery punishable by death, what then should they do?


Maybe set aside a sparsely populated vagina shaped island state and allow all the poofugees of the world to immigrate there.


The Jews Aussie moved there might stone them.


Does Aussie want the Jews to move to tassy because he thinks they're cbunts and they should live in a place that looks like one?


Well Israel is a religious state, that's a cbunt of an idea. Might as well make it look the part.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #57 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:37pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:27pm:
rhino wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:24pm:
So ozzy supports stoning to death for adultery. Interesting.


Really?  Where did.......oops............nah........just noticed.  You did not address that to me.

Just an observation. I will keep it in mind for the future.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Secret Wars
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #58 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:38pm
 
Gordon wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:30pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:28pm:
Gordon wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:27pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:18pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:08pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:05pm:
freediver wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 9:58pm:
I think Aussie has invented a new human right - the right to flee human rights abuses. That's all there is left. We can call it Aussie's "wunaway wevolution".


You could Effendi, I know, but I won't buy it.

Is it an abuse of human rights for the State to kill a murderer where that is legal in the relevant State, Effendi?


Is poofery murder or a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults?



It is a victimless pursuit of sexual gratification between consenting adults.

How is that relevant to the discussion which is about compliance with the Laws of a foreign State (one where we here have no say apart from futile chest beating posturing) in which you live and the consequences to you if you breach that State's Laws?


Then rather than say they should just pack up and move, you should hold the position of those states in contempt. If all countries held poofery punishable by death, what then should they do?


Maybe set aside a sparsely populated vagina shaped island state and allow all the poofugees of the world to immigrate there.


The Jews Aussie moved there might stone them.


Does Aussie want the Jews to move to tassy because he thinks they're cbunts and they should live in a place that looks like one?


Well he clarified earlier he didn't meant Jews to move, he just wanted Israel to move.  Maybe he just means renaming a Tasmanian town.   Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: a different perspective on human rights
Reply #59 - May 21st, 2017 at 10:40pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:34pm:
Setanta wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:32pm:
Aussie wrote on May 21st, 2017 at 10:29pm:
Quote:
That does not changed what you asked and what I gave an answer too. The goal posts are over here | |.


Have another go at that.


No need.

You asked:
Quote:
Is the extinguishment of existence a denial of 'human rights?'

Let's see how you blokes deal with that.


I dealt with it.


No, you posted this gibber:

Quote:
That does not changed what you asked and what I gave an answer too. The goal posts are over here | |.



Perhaps you may want to post the whole lot Aussie, or at least make your point..

It was an easy answer for me, no DP. I didn't struggle with it at all.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print