Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Rule proposals.. (Read 3603 times)
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Hero of the Soviet Union

Posts: 4106
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #60 - May 4th, 2017 at 6:07pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 4:50pm:
Caesaraugustus, OzPol is not a place where any weight is given to a declaration of a win.  In fact, you may have noticed how many times buffoons here declare themselves a winner....or 'mark their own home-work' as I often say.  Real validation is not going to happen with a Rule of the kind you propose.....'Whoopeeeeee. I won because he did not reply in time.'

Nah.

Best to demonstrate the quality of what you post by simply posting.....quality.  Over time, others will take a position of respect or total lack of interest or somewhere, anywhere in between.  To use Karnal as an example.  You have to have been here for a while to understand this bloke.  Yeas, its a bloke not a woman. More than half the time, he is taking the piss and it is obvious to those who know what he does.  On other occasions, it is always crystal clear when he is presenting a serious opinion which, in my experience, is always very cogently and credibly argued.  But......he gets no Winner's Crown for it.  He just gets on with being......Karnal.

OzPol does not award 'Winner' medals.  Quite the reverse, if anything.

Cheers.


Indeed, Ich am just complaining because. I'm over it now. Cheers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 59631
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #61 - May 4th, 2017 at 6:14pm
 
Culture Warrior wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 6:04pm:
but you've not established how I've been hypocritical.

sure I did. It's all there in black and white.
Back to top
 

REPORTER: The condition of the budget will not be an excuse for breaking promises?

TONY ABBOTT: Exactly right. We will keep the commitments that we make.
 
IP Logged
 
Culture Warrior
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 9680
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #62 - May 4th, 2017 at 6:52pm
 
nope.
Back to top
 

Putting antagonistic tribes into the one country will and has lead to civil wars - Jovial Monk.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23670
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #63 - May 5th, 2017 at 10:50am
 
Culture Warrior wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 4:56pm:
Karnal has no credibility. His positions change according to party lines.



Wayward wretch.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Peace \/ man

Posts: 12108
Northern NSW
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #64 - May 5th, 2017 at 6:06pm
 
Be careful about turning feedback into general chat. Never turn it into a shitfight.
Back to top
 

nu ninda an ezzateni watar ma ekuteni
 
IP Logged
 
Sad Kangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 962
Gold Coast
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #65 - Jun 1st, 2017 at 9:32am
 
I wonder if this rule has been proposed to deal with Light...

But in reality, well, perhaps not reality bet lets just go with Parliament, during question time it is almost expected that a response is given, but rarely does it actually answer the question.

I would suspect should such a silly rule be implemented here that it would only end up being much the same.

The racism and bigotry towards anyone who doesn't fit the conservative idea of normal (white heterosexuals) it a much bigger problem around here than having to force people to address scrutiny or criticism directed at them lest they be deemed to have "lost" the argument.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print