Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Rule proposals.. (Read 6778 times)
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #60 - May 4th, 2017 at 6:07pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 4:50pm:
Caesaraugustus, OzPol is not a place where any weight is given to a declaration of a win.  In fact, you may have noticed how many times buffoons here declare themselves a winner....or 'mark their own home-work' as I often say.  Real validation is not going to happen with a Rule of the kind you propose.....'Whoopeeeeee. I won because he did not reply in time.'

Nah.

Best to demonstrate the quality of what you post by simply posting.....quality.  Over time, others will take a position of respect or total lack of interest or somewhere, anywhere in between.  To use Karnal as an example.  You have to have been here for a while to understand this bloke.  Yeas, its a bloke not a woman. More than half the time, he is taking the piss and it is obvious to those who know what he does.  On other occasions, it is always crystal clear when he is presenting a serious opinion which, in my experience, is always very cogently and credibly argued.  But......he gets no Winner's Crown for it.  He just gets on with being......Karnal.

OzPol does not award 'Winner' medals.  Quite the reverse, if anything.

Cheers.


Indeed, Ich am just complaining because. I'm over it now. Cheers.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71830
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #61 - May 4th, 2017 at 6:14pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 6:04pm:
but you've not established how I've been hypocritical.

sure I did. It's all there in black and white.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10259
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #62 - May 4th, 2017 at 6:52pm
 
nope.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34369
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #63 - May 5th, 2017 at 10:50am
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 4:56pm:
Karnal has no credibility. His positions change according to party lines.



Wayward wretch.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15826
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #64 - May 5th, 2017 at 6:06pm
 
Be careful about turning feedback into general chat. Never turn it into a shitfight.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 14876
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #65 - Jun 1st, 2017 at 9:32am
 
I wonder if this rule has been proposed to deal with Light...

But in reality, well, perhaps not reality bet lets just go with Parliament, during question time it is almost expected that a response is given, but rarely does it actually answer the question.

I would suspect should such a silly rule be implemented here that it would only end up being much the same.

The racism and bigotry towards anyone who doesn't fit the conservative idea of normal (white heterosexuals) it a much bigger problem around here than having to force people to address scrutiny or criticism directed at them lest they be deemed to have "lost" the argument.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print