Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
Rule proposals.. (Read 3861 times)
cods
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 65142
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #15 - May 4th, 2017 at 2:18pm
 
I like the way he thinks every gives a fig about rules.. Smiley Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Vic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6307
Mornington Peninsula, Victoria
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #16 - May 4th, 2017 at 2:24pm
 
You haven't responded to my post in politics regarding Welfare.   You have 24 hours left or i win (nah nah nah nah nah)
Back to top
 

Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 65142
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #17 - May 4th, 2017 at 2:26pm
 
Vic wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:24pm:
You haven't responded to my post in politics regarding Welfare.   You have 24 hours left or i win (nah nah nah nah nah)



you forgot... the important bit


you loseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......

I think it has a chance.. Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 51729
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #18 - May 4th, 2017 at 2:28pm
 
I agree with your argument, Augie. Let's do it.

Starting from now.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24633
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #19 - May 4th, 2017 at 2:32pm
 
Karnal wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:28pm:
I agree with your argument, Augie. Let's do it.

Starting from now.


I thoroughly disagree.

I think we should start after i knock off from work.

Make your case as to why would should start now and not when i knock off from work or concede defeat.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 61443
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #20 - May 4th, 2017 at 2:35pm
 
mothra wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:32pm:
Karnal wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:28pm:
I agree with your argument, Augie. Let's do it.

Starting from now.


I thoroughly disagree.

I think we should start after i knock off from work.

Make your case as to why would should start now and not when i knock off from work or concede defeat.


that's not a valid argument, just give up and declare me the winner
Back to top
 

REPORTER: The condition of the budget will not be an excuse for breaking promises?

TONY ABBOTT: Exactly right. We will keep the commitments that we make.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24633
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #21 - May 4th, 2017 at 2:39pm
 
John Smith wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:35pm:
mothra wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:32pm:
Karnal wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:28pm:
I agree with your argument, Augie. Let's do it.

Starting from now.


I thoroughly disagree.

I think we should start after i knock off from work.

Make your case as to why would should start now and not when i knock off from work or concede defeat.


that's not a valid argument, just give up and declare me the winner



I'll have you know, i'm electing to ignore your argument because i consider it unworthy of my attention, not because i'm conceding defeat.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24633
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #22 - May 4th, 2017 at 2:47pm
 
I see Karnal has declared me the winner.

Right, we'll start after i knock off from work.

I'm choosing to ignore the fact that the conditions of my victory are dependent on the  fulfillment of the hypothesis that i am not accepting begins until after i knock off from work but unless someone can present me with a valid reason why i can't do that, i see no reason why my victory should be challenged.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 5th, 2017 at 10:51am by mothra »  

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 51729
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #23 - May 4th, 2017 at 3:16pm
 
mothra wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:47pm:
I see Karnal has declared me the winner.


Fck off, TROLL... Leftard IDIOT...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13702
Gender: male
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #24 - May 4th, 2017 at 3:20pm
 
I propose a rule that Karnal change her sweaty burqa once every three days instead of the current one month. Tongue
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 51729
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #25 - May 4th, 2017 at 3:21pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 3:20pm:
I propose a rule that Karnal change her sweaty burqa once every three days instead of the current one month. Tongue


In 48 hours, you'll be right, Homo. That'll make me wrong.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24633
Gender: female
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #26 - May 4th, 2017 at 3:23pm
 
Karnal wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 3:16pm:
mothra wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 2:47pm:
I see Karnal has declared me the winner.


Fck off, TROLL... Leftard IDIOT...


A compelling argument.

Alright, i concede defeat. We'll start now.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
AugCaesarustus
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Founding Father of Australia's
First Republic

Posts: 4349
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #27 - May 4th, 2017 at 3:40pm
 
cods wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 1:48pm:
John Smith wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 1:32pm:
AugCaesarustus wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 1:29pm:
then that person shall be deemed to have lost the argument, and must change his/her point of view and agree with the person with whom he/she argued.



how old are you?




  Grin Grin Grin..

he believes   he can win an argument on here..by default..



ooooooooooooooooooo if only.. Grin Grin Grin Grin


If you're not willing to participate in the debate in question, then you shouldn't comment on these rules.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AugCaesarustus
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Founding Father of Australia's
First Republic

Posts: 4349
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #28 - May 4th, 2017 at 3:41pm
 
cods wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 1:51pm:
AugCaesarustus wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm:
I wrote this post because I presented an example to Ye Grappler yesterday. He was logged on but didn't respond, probably because he felt that the example was not worthy of debate. I refer to 'Sensible Welfare Reform.' I think the example I've provided is reasonable.

If Ye Grappler does not respond or continue to engage in meaningful debate, then he must concede defeat and accept my point of view. As someone who rails against the establishment, Ye Grappler is acting like a politician by avoiding the difficult questions, which is hypocritical.




my dear sir..... has it occurred to your good self grap had lost complete interest  in your argument and couldnt be bothered...

if you are looking for knock out blows to win any argument   this is the wrong place for you..


If he cannot be bothered, then he shouldn't make counter-claims in the first place.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AugCaesarustus
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Founding Father of Australia's
First Republic

Posts: 4349
Re: Rule proposals..
Reply #29 - May 4th, 2017 at 3:43pm
 
mothra wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 1:51pm:
AugCaesarustus wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm:
I wrote this post because I presented an example to Ye Grappler yesterday. He was logged on but didn't respond, probably because he felt that the example was not worthy of debate. I refer to 'Sensible Welfare Reform.' I think the example I've provided is reasonable.

If Ye Grappler does not respond or continue to engage in meaningful debate, then he must concede defeat and accept my point of view. As someone who rails against the establishment, Ye Grappler is acting like a politician by avoiding the difficult questions, which is hypocritical.


He doesn't have to do anything of the sort.

Sometimes you're in the mood for certain subjects, sometimes you aren't.

Sometimes you can clearly see there is no point rebutting because the person is intractable. It does not equate to a concession of defeat. It is just a recognition of what is bootless.

Sometimes, as i said, some posts are threads are not worthy of comment. That doesn't imply tacit agreement with the premise.




I suggest that you read the final posts of the that thread 'Sensible Welfare Reform' and decide for yourself. I simply presented an individual situation, which I be to be plausible, and asked how Ye Grappler's policies would work for that person. I don't think that's unreasonable, do you?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print