UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 3:11am:
Yes, hardee-har-har, Herbert. But where do you begin? Do you have a crystal ball to tell you who would be an ideal candidate for that remainder 5% who are not mainly caucasian, atheist, post-modern egalitarians?
You've lost me. What 5%? It's just a personal preference of mine that mainly white Caucasian homelands of historic background should remain over-whelmingly white Caucasian so as to identify as the homeland of its indigenous locals. I say this of white countries, black countries, and Asian countries.
It's patently ridiculous that a tourist arriving in Britain for a holiday sees little more than Indian staff, hijabs and turbans upon walking into the Customs Hall, and then an Indian drives him into London where the majority of people are coloured just as is the Mayor who is also a Muslim. To my mind this is a huge betrayal by Britain's politicians over the years, and I've always admitted it quite openly that I wouldn't hesitate to have every last one of these contributing politicians flushed out from their hiding places to be hanged from piano-wire from butchers meat-hooks set in the ceiling. It would give me the greatest of pleasure to see these bastards swing from the neck for having conspired to drown the British people in a Babel's Tower of foreigners.
UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 3:11am:
Even if we do concentrate on getting the best and brightest for the 5%, we might be missing out on some good citizens.
You're missing the point. I'm not talking about your 'generic' citizens, I'm talking about not letting Western immigration departments gradually phase out their white Christian locals as the majority demographic through the strategy of implementing decades of coloured and Muslim immigration streams - as they have certainly been doing for quite some decades now.
UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 3:11am:
Perhaps you mean the major cities need those migrants to be 95% white, atheist post-modernists, so that the cities can remain looking at western as those regional and rural towns that run between 90 and 100% caucasian?
" ... atheist post-modernists" ... why the need to demean and caricaturise these whites? For balance, where's your disdainful caricaturising of the non-whites?
UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 3:11am:
As far as I can tell, if Australia could get away with having that sort of policy, we would still have that policy. The White Australia policy ended, not because Australia needed to fill the country with non-white people, but because we did not have a great deal of choice. British women started closing their legs, and adopting contraceptives that have lead to birth rates falling below replacement levels. So too for much of Europe. We are not going to get large numbers of Europeans migrating to Australia.
Australia's immigration department started the trend of squeezing off the white European immigration streams upon the publishing of Brit-basher Professor Donald Horne's book 'God is an Englishman' (1969) (heavy sarcasm) - in which he urges Australia's politicians to consider Turks for immigration just as much as bringing the Brits out here.
And then Al Grassby was immigration minister from 1972 - 1974 ... Quote: "We've got to get rid of Australia's white ghettoes". Almost single-handedly it was he who initiated and ran the 'ethnic immigration' program for no other reason than out of sheer spite with himself identifying as a 'wog'. It had nothing to do with economic imperatives.
UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 3:11am:
We also have the problem of trade. No one will trade with us if we had an immigration policy that resembled most of the white Australia policy.
Not this old furphy.
Both Japan and China have grown rich through trade since the war years despite Japan's racist immigration policies and China's anti-human rights records and communist dictatorship under which firing squads are a growth industry.
If you've got something to sell, the world will beat a path to your door no matter what your politics or your anti-human rights violations. Saudi Arabia has US presidents bowing deeply at the waist to their royal family.
Here's Dick Smith on the subject of population growth and the lie that the economy depends upon it ...
link UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 3:11am:
Decolonised countries around the world ... would probably be pointing the finger in our direction to point out how racially insensitive we are towards black people, blah, blah, blah.
Preserving the racial type and ethnicity of your ancestral homeland is neither immoral nor a matter to feel guilty about. No one's claiming racial superiority - only demographic integrity and compatibility with the locals.
You need to stop being in such a moral panic about what 'the world would think of us' if we were to favour our Own Kind in future immigration policy.
In this way has the West's immigration policy contrived to fracture and deconstruct its own societal harmony.