Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
banning people Mk II (Read 1825 times)
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
banning people Mk II
Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:13pm
 
I can't post in feedback so I had to start another thread.

I noticed the resident wannabe mod is trying to play games again

this is what he posted

A total of 33 Members have voted, and only 3 made a vote consistent with leaving things as they are.  A whopping 91.91% of your members who have voted so far want change, and the great majority want things to be more strict (the Rules enforced more strictly) and the method of bannings made different to the current system.


given that the 'maintain the status quo' option was only put up after most of the regulars had already voted, a fact you are all to aware off, your figures don't mean sh1t.


Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #1 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:17pm
 
John Smith wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:13pm:
I can't post in feedback so I had to start another thread.

I noticed the resident wannabe mod is trying to play games again

this is what he posted

A total of 33 Members have voted, and only 3 made a vote consistent with leaving things as they are.  A whopping 91.91% of your members who have voted so far want change, and the great majority want things to be more strict (the Rules enforced more strictly) and the method of bannings made different to the current system.


given that the 'maintain the status quo' option was only put up after most of the regulars had already voted, a fact you are all to aware off, your figures don't mean sh1t.




You can vote in that Poll, Mr Smith, even if you cannot post in Feedback.  My sole reason for making this response is to stick it right up you for lying.  I have posted a zillion times I do not want and will not accept a GMod job here at OzPol.

I am playing no games other than with the cards we all have been dealt.  That's all anyone can do.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #2 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:20pm
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:17pm:
You can vote in that Poll, Mr Smith, even if you cannot post in Feedback. 


I did vote, but at the time 'status quo' wasn't an option.

Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:17pm:
My sole reason for making this response is to stick it right up you for lying.  I have posted a zillion times I do not want and will not accept a GMod job here at OzPol.


talk is cheap.

Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:17pm:
I am playing no games other than with the cards we all have been dealt.


sure you are, you live for the games.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #3 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:25pm
 
Further, the late addition of the 'Status Quo' option will not have any impact of those who HAVE voted more strict, less strict and for do it differently.   They would not have voted that way unless that is what they wanted.   If they did not want any of those three, they would have not voted at all...or gone 'undecided.'
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #4 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:29pm
 
John Smith wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:20pm:
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:17pm:
You can vote in that Poll, Mr Smith, even if you cannot post in Feedback. 


I did vote, but at the time 'status quo' wasn't an option.

Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:17pm:
My sole reason for making this response is to stick it right up you for lying.  I have posted a zillion times I do not want and will not accept a GMod job here at OzPol.


talk is cheap.

Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:17pm:
I am playing no games other than with the cards we all have been dealt.


sure you are, you live for the games.


I am posting facts, Mr Smith...plain and clear facts.  If you don't like the outcome of the Poll, not my problem.

Stop crying.

'Talk' in the case of what I said about a GMod position is all I can do.  I'll say it again for you and anybody else who does not seem to understand very unambiguous words in plain English.

I do not want a GMod job at OzPol and I would not accept it even if offered.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #5 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:37pm
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:29pm:
I am posting facts, Mr Smith...plain and clear facts.  If you don't like the outcome of the Poll, not my problem.


no your not, you're posting lies
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #6 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:38pm
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:29pm:
'Talk' in the case of what I said about a GMod position is all I can do.


wrong .... you can act like someone who doesn't want to be mod.

You don't miss an opportunity to try to undermine the mods. The only reasonable reason for that is because you are hoping to take their place.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #7 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:46pm
 
John Smith wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:37pm:
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:29pm:
I am posting facts, Mr Smith...plain and clear facts.  If you don't like the outcome of the Poll, not my problem.


no your not, you're posting lies


Show me any lie. 

As for me not missing an opportunity on GMods....I accept that I fight back when they interfere, contrary to the Rules, in Relationships.  I also comment on the obvious, like for example, that Setanta is the only GMod pulling their weight now and has been for quite some time.  If you think that's false, you are truly are a certifiable idiot sobbing in his cup because the Poll did not go their way.

Talk to the hand, Smith, I am not going to repeat my self just for you.

...




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #8 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 11:34pm
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:46pm:
Show me any lie. 



Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:17pm:
I do not want and will not accept a GMod job here at OzPol.

Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79545
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #9 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 12:30am
 
Why bother banning people?  Just ignore them unless they are outrageous trolls.... and actually harmful or vicious in intent, as some who've come here have been.....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #10 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 7:58am
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:25pm:
Further, the late addition of the 'Status Quo' option will not have any impact of those who HAVE voted more strict, less strict and for do it differently.   They would not have voted that way unless that is what they wanted.   If they did not want any of those three, they would have not voted at all...or gone 'undecided.'


Of course, the people who didn't vote, don't show up in your statistics. Der!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #11 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 8:06am
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 7:58am:
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:25pm:
Further, the late addition of the 'Status Quo' option will not have any impact of those who HAVE voted more strict, less strict and for do it differently.   They would not have voted that way unless that is what they wanted.   If they did not want any of those three, they would have not voted at all...or gone 'undecided.'


Of course, the people who didn't vote, don't show up in your statistics. Der!


Indeed.  'Der.'

So, they can still vote.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #12 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:07am
 
John Smith wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:38pm:
Aussie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:29pm:
'Talk' in the case of what I said about a GMod position is all I can do.


wrong .... you can act like someone who doesn't want to be mod.

You don't miss an opportunity to try to undermine the mods. The only reasonable reason for that is because you are hoping to take their place.

I would put my house on FD NEVER making ozzz a G mod.
FD sacked him twice when he held any sort of power greater than a hall monitor in a primary school.
As for the reason for this thread, it sucks FD would start threads in boards that many members have no access to.
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47043
At my desk.
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #13 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:07am
 
Relax John, no-one is fooled.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 43272
Gender: male
Re: banning people Mk II
Reply #14 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:11am
 
Is Setanta going to get some help or is he going to be left as the sole active GMod?
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print