Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Shark attacks (Read 3672 times)
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Shark attacks
Apr 18th, 2017 at 6:37pm
 
The apex predator of the oceans need to be culled, in particular the great white. Every other fish is being taken out of the oceans but these monsters are protected, surfers are being eaten left right and center and it is no wonder.
I declare open season on these fish.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #1 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 6:57pm
 
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


when they grow legs and run up the b each I might agree with you..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Unforgiven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #2 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 6:59pm
 
I have been attacked by a shark. A gummy shark.

Agnes.
Back to top
 

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #3 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 7:20pm
 
Gummy shark is tasty, but not the porno version the gold top mushroom eater refers to, sports bet is odds on another surfer will be eaten within the week.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #4 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 7:33pm
 
The poor things are simply doing what comes naturally.

Besides how many people die from shark attack each year?

A hell of a lot less than from terrorism.

Now there is an idea, cull the CULT

CULL THE CULT, CULL THE CULT, CULL THE CULT.

Makes quite a good chant dont it?
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #5 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 7:54pm
 
What that family in Esperance has just gone through is unfathomable Sad

I was in the surf today for 2 hours today with firstborn and one of her mates and I was shitting myself every time they got more than 5 meters away from me.

As for culling, nah, there's always more fish in the sea.

I do support netting the busiest swimming beaches.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #6 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:07pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 7:54pm:
What that family in Esperance has just gone through is unfathomable Sad

I was in the surf today for 2 hours today with firstborn and one of her mates and I was shitting myself every time they got more than 5 meters away from me.

As for culling, nah, there's always more fish in the sea.

I do support netting the busiest swimming beaches.

A bit wishy washy their Gordon, look after your own with nets, not to many pointers around your way anyway.
Plenty of fish, no.
If your going out in the water just enjoy, if you worry about sharks they will sense fear and eat you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #7 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:17pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:07pm:
Gordon wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 7:54pm:
What that family in Esperance has just gone through is unfathomable Sad

I was in the surf today for 2 hours today with firstborn and one of her mates and I was shitting myself every time they got more than 5 meters away from me.

As for culling, nah, there's always more fish in the sea.

I do support netting the busiest swimming beaches.

A bit wishy washy their Gordon, look after your own with nets, not to many pointers around your way anyway.
Plenty of fish, no.
If your going out in the water just enjoy, if you worry about sharks they will sense fear and eat you.


Netting beaches in high density population areas makes sense.  Mass culling of sharks doesn't.

Before too long there will be drones above all beaches that use software to detect sharks a few meters under water and sound an alarm, maybe directly to a surfers watch
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
fezz
Senior Member
****
Offline


Where's my red hat?

Posts: 280
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #8 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm
 
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.
Back to top
 

I would rather be poor and produce nothing than be an arsehole and conquer the world
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #9 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm
 
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.

Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
fezz
Senior Member
****
Offline


Where's my red hat?

Posts: 280
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #10 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.
Back to top
 

I would rather be poor and produce nothing than be an arsehole and conquer the world
 
IP Logged
 
fezz
Senior Member
****
Offline


Where's my red hat?

Posts: 280
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #11 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:39pm
 
I guess culling also comes down to personal beliefs ... the view of manifest destiny or not.
Back to top
 

I would rather be poor and produce nothing than be an arsehole and conquer the world
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #12 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:06pm
 
Nobody really definitively knows why sharks attacks are on the rise of late , nor why they're coming so close to shore  Undecided

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 80205
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #13 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:25pm
 
More sharks - more attacks.

I agree with the English lady with whom I discussed this - she said:-

"When I think of sharks, I think of fish and chips."
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #14 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:46pm
 
Surely netting can be designed that would cut down on the number of other sea creatures trapped ...
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #15 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 8:23am
 
The abalone divers on south coast saying interactions have gone from one in every 1200 dive hours to one in every 500 dive hours
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #16 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:12am
 
Its time wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:06pm:
Nobody really definitively knows why sharks attacks are on the rise of late , nor why they're coming so close to shore  Undecided



I reckon I know.....

I blame the Greens...

MARINE PARKS.. with no rec fishing zones...

what do you expect...

thats right fish galore Roll Eyes....

its not rocket science.. its commonsense..

more fish for sharks to feast on without too much effort...

everything is protected now   and I am not sure but I dont think sharks are too fussy about what they eat...so if a human is in amongst the "fish of the day"...why not?.. Roll Eyes

AiA wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:46pm:
Surely netting can be designed that would cut down on the number of other sea creatures trapped ...




they tried that in NSW  the next day the morons removed them.....but didnt tell the swimmers.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

makes sense to some!

the only answer is.. stay out of the water..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #17 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:46am
 
cods wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:12am:
Its time wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:06pm:
Nobody really definitively knows why sharks attacks are on the rise of late , nor why they're coming so close to shore  Undecided



I reckon I know.....

I blame the Greens...

MARINE PARKS.. with no rec fishing zones...

what do you expect...

thats right fish galore Roll Eyes....

its not rocket science.. its commonsense..

more fish for sharks to feast on without too much effort...

everything is protected now   and I am not sure but I dont think sharks are too fussy about what they eat...so if a human is in amongst the "fish of the day"...why not?.. Roll Eyes

AiA wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:46pm:
Surely netting can be designed that would cut down on the number of other sea creatures trapped ...




they tried that in NSW  the next day the nice people removed them.....but didnt tell the swimmers.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

makes sense to some!


the only answer is.. stay out of the water..




Correct.

A sensible, an easily achieved solution.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #18 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:52am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:46am:
cods wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:12am:
Its time wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:06pm:
Nobody really definitively knows why sharks attacks are on the rise of late , nor why they're coming so close to shore  Undecided



I reckon I know.....

I blame the Greens...

MARINE PARKS.. with no rec fishing zones...

what do you expect...

thats right fish galore Roll Eyes....

its not rocket science.. its commonsense..

more fish for sharks to feast on without too much effort...

everything is protected now   and I am not sure but I dont think sharks are too fussy about what they eat...so if a human is in amongst the "fish of the day"...why not?.. Roll Eyes

AiA wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:46pm:
Surely netting can be designed that would cut down on the number of other sea creatures trapped ...




they tried that in NSW  the next day the nice people removed them.....but didnt tell the swimmers.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

makes sense to some!


the only answer is.. stay out of the water..




Correct.

A sensible, an easily achieved solution.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #19 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:57am
 
cods wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:52am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:46am:
cods wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:12am:
Its time wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:06pm:
Nobody really definitively knows why sharks attacks are on the rise of late , nor why they're coming so close to shore  Undecided



I reckon I know.....

I blame the Greens...

MARINE PARKS.. with no rec fishing zones...

what do you expect...

thats right fish galore Roll Eyes....

its not rocket science.. its commonsense..

more fish for sharks to feast on without too much effort...

everything is protected now   and I am not sure but I dont think sharks are too fussy about what they eat...so if a human is in amongst the "fish of the day"...why not?.. Roll Eyes

AiA wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:46pm:
Surely netting can be designed that would cut down on the number of other sea creatures trapped ...




they tried that in NSW  the next day the nice people removed them.....but didnt tell the swimmers.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

makes sense to some!


the only answer is.. stay out of the water..




Correct.

A sensible, an easily achieved solution.




If you don't want to be run over by a car, don't play on the road.

Simples!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #20 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 10:07am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:57am:
cods wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:52am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:46am:
cods wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 9:12am:
Its time wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:06pm:
Nobody really definitively knows why sharks attacks are on the rise of late , nor why they're coming so close to shore  Undecided



I reckon I know.....

I blame the Greens...

MARINE PARKS.. with no rec fishing zones...

what do you expect...

thats right fish galore Roll Eyes....

its not rocket science.. its commonsense..

more fish for sharks to feast on without too much effort...

everything is protected now   and I am not sure but I dont think sharks are too fussy about what they eat...so if a human is in amongst the "fish of the day"...why not?.. Roll Eyes

AiA wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 11:46pm:
Surely netting can be designed that would cut down on the number of other sea creatures trapped ...




they tried that in NSW  the next day the nice people removed them.....but didnt tell the swimmers.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

makes sense to some!


the only answer is.. stay out of the water..




Correct.

A sensible, an easily achieved solution.




If you don't want to be run over by a car, don't play on the road.

Simples!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #21 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 10:07am
 
I reckon tech is the answer.

Drones and software similar to facial recognition which can spot sharks even a few meters under water.

DJI have a hover time of close to 30 mins and a recharge time of 60mins so with x4 you could make an automated system where the recharged one takes off as one returns.

And then you have sonar bouys like the one being tested at Bondi.

If you want to swim or surf on a remote bit of coastline, that's on you Smiley
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #22 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 10:09am
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 10:07am:
I reckon tech is the answer.

Drones and software similar to facial recognition which can spot sharks even a few meters under water.

DJI have a hover time of close to 30 mins and a recharge time of 60mins so with x4 you could make an automated system where the recharged one takes off as one returns.

And then you have sonar bouys like the one being tested at Bondi.

If you want to swim or surf on a remote bit of coastline, that's on you Smiley



LIFE is one big FAT RISK....
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #23 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 10:13am
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 10:07am:
I reckon tech is the answer.

Drones and software similar to facial recognition which can spot sharks even a few meters under water.

DJI have a hover time of close to 30 mins and a recharge time of 60mins so with x4 you could make an automated system where the recharged one takes off as one returns.

And then you have sonar bouys like the one being tested at Bondi.


If you want to swim or surf on a remote bit of coastline, that's on you Smiley


Exactly.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 80205
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #24 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:53pm
 
Bomb the sharks.....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #25 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:55pm
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47364
At my desk.
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #26 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:09pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 10:07am:
I reckon tech is the answer.

Drones and software similar to facial recognition which can spot sharks even a few meters under water.

DJI have a hover time of close to 30 mins and a recharge time of 60mins so with x4 you could make an automated system where the recharged one takes off as one returns.

And then you have sonar bouys like the one being tested at Bondi.

If you want to swim or surf on a remote bit of coastline, that's on you Smiley


Submarine drones with fish finders. It's a bit hard to train a computer to spot a shark when you can't see it yourself.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #27 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:12pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:55pm:

Holy sh1t!! flying sharks, yep blow em up.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #28 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:14pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:12pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 4:55pm:

Holy sh1t!! flying sharks, yep blow em up.


Grab a chainsaw!


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #29 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm
 
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #30 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #31 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:30pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!

Don't go walking down a mall either without bollards.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #32 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:32pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!

Don't go walking down mall either without  bollards either.


I'm not asking for cars to be "culled".

Understand the difference?   Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #33 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:41pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:32pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!

Don't go walking down mall either without  bollards either.


I'm not asking for cars to be "culled".

Understand the difference?   Wink

One fish species are becoming a real threat and they should be dealt with accordingly, Cull Cull Cull.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #34 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:44pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:41pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:32pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!

Don't go walking down mall either without  bollards either.


I'm not asking for cars to be "culled".

Understand the difference?   Wink

One fish species are becoming a real threat and they should be dealt with accordingly, Cull Cull Cull.


Stay out of the water, and they pose no threat whatsoever.

You're carrying on like an hysterical schoolgirl.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #35 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:50pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:41pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:32pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!

Don't go walking down mall either without  bollards either.


I'm not asking for cars to be "culled".

Understand the difference?   Wink

One fish species are becoming a real threat and they should be dealt with accordingly, Cull Cull Cull.


Stay out of the water, and they pose no threat whatsoever.

You're carrying on like an hysterical schoolgirl.



Maybe if you'd get in the water for a swim once in a while your health wouldn't have deteriorated so dramatically.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34507
Gender: female
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #36 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:52pm
 
Gordy. Just making stuff up again. Typical.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #37 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:54pm
 
It's interesting that the pointer is the apex predator of the oceans yet killer whales have their measure, last year in front of a boat load of tourists off Pt Lincoln (on you tube somewhere) two killer whales attacked and killed a huge great white, they compete for the same food, yet their is not one recorded case (in the wild) of a killer whale attacking a human, they are our friends and we could train them to patrol our beaches.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #38 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:54pm
 
mothra wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
Gordy. Just making stuff up again. Typical.


His health hasn't been good since he told us his Napa holiday was cancelled due to ill health. If only he'd head down to the beach and take the waters once in a while. Poor Gregg.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #39 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:56pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:50pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:41pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:32pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!

Don't go walking down mall either without  bollards either.


I'm not asking for cars to be "culled".

Understand the difference?   Wink

One fish species are becoming a real threat and they should be dealt with accordingly, Cull Cull Cull.


Stay out of the water, and they pose no threat whatsoever.

You're carrying on like an hysterical schoolgirl.



Maybe if you'd get in the water for a swim once in a while your health wouldn't have deteriorated so dramatically.


I was swimming in the ocean, in Femantle, for a few hours yesterday before having lunch on the beach.

I know the risks when going in the water, and I take full responsibility.

If I'm taken by a shark, none of my family are going to get hysterical and demand that all sharks be killed.

Similarly, if one of my family is taken I won't be calling for revenge.

That's the difference between reasonable, well-informed, rational people and imbeciles.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #40 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:58pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:54pm:
It's interesting that the pointer is the apex predator of the oceans yet killer whales have their measure, last year in front of a boat load of tourists off Pt Lincoln (on you tube somewhere) two killer whales attacked and killed a huge great white, they compete for the same food, yet their is not one recorded case (in the wild) of a killer whale attacking a human, they are our friends and we could train them to patrol our beaches.


Check this out.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/06/140613-great-white-shark-canniba...
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #41 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:15pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:56pm:
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:50pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:41pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:32pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!

Don't go walking down mall either without  bollards either.


I'm not asking for cars to be "culled".

Understand the difference?   Wink

One fish species are becoming a real threat and they should be dealt with accordingly, Cull Cull Cull.


Stay out of the water, and they pose no threat whatsoever.

You're carrying on like an hysterical schoolgirl.



Maybe if you'd get in the water for a swim once in a while your health wouldn't have deteriorated so dramatically.


I was swimming in the ocean, in Femantle, for a few hours yesterday before having lunch on the beach.

I know the risks when going in the water, and I take full responsibility.

If I'm taken by a shark, none of my family are going to get hysterical and demand that all sharks be killed.

Similarly, if one of my family is taken I won't be calling for revenge.

That's the difference between reasonable, well-informed, rational people and imbeciles.


Being eaten alive puts the wind up any rational person.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #42 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:16pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:56pm:
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:50pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:41pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:32pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:20pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


Or, don't go in the water.

Simples!

Don't go walking down mall either without  bollards either.


I'm not asking for cars to be "culled".

Understand the difference?   Wink

One fish species are becoming a real threat and they should be dealt with accordingly, Cull Cull Cull.


Stay out of the water, and they pose no threat whatsoever.

You're carrying on like an hysterical schoolgirl.



Maybe if you'd get in the water for a swim once in a while your health wouldn't have deteriorated so dramatically.


I was swimming in the ocean, in Femantle, for a few hours yesterday before having lunch on the beach.

I know the risks when going in the water, and I take full responsibility.

If I'm taken by a shark, none of my family are going to get hysterical and demand that all sharks be killed.

Similarly, if one of my family is taken I won't be calling for revenge.

That's the difference between reasonable, well-informed, rational people and imbeciles.


Being eaten alive puts the wind up any rational person.


Absolutely.

In order to avoid it, though, one simply refrains from going into the ocean.

Simples!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #43 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:17pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:58pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:54pm:
It's interesting that the pointer is the apex predator of the oceans yet killer whales have their measure, last year in front of a boat load of tourists off Pt Lincoln (on you tube somewhere) two killer whales attacked and killed a huge great white, they compete for the same food, yet their is not one recorded case (in the wild) of a killer whale attacking a human, they are our friends and we could train them to patrol our beaches.


Check this out.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/06/140613-great-white-shark-canniba...

It looks like the killer whales are already on the job.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #44 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:31pm
 
The ocean is our playground and predators should be kept in check.
Hundreds of thousands of sharks are caught and have their fins sliced off and then thrown back alive to die slowly, yet we cant cull a few monsters from our shores.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #45 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:50pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:17pm:
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:58pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:54pm:
It's interesting that the pointer is the apex predator of the oceans yet killer whales have their measure, last year in front of a boat load of tourists off Pt Lincoln (on you tube somewhere) two killer whales attacked and killed a huge great white, they compete for the same food, yet their is not one recorded case (in the wild) of a killer whale attacking a human, they are our friends and we could train them to patrol our beaches.


Check this out.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/06/140613-great-white-shark-canniba...

It looks like the killer whales are already on the job.


Seeing a killer whale in the wild is so on my bucket list.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #46 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:51pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:31pm:
The ocean is our playground and predators should be kept in check.
Hundreds of thousands of sharks are caught and have their fins sliced off and then thrown back alive to die slowly, yet we cant cull a few monsters from our shores.


Incorrect.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #47 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:53pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:51pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:31pm:
The ocean is our playground and predators should be kept in check.
Hundreds of thousands of sharks are caught and have their fins sliced off and then thrown back alive to die slowly, yet we cant cull a few monsters from our shores.


Incorrect.



Fish before people.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #48 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:56pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:53pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:51pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:31pm:
The ocean is our playground and predators should be kept in check.
Hundreds of thousands of sharks are caught and have their fins sliced off and then thrown back alive to die slowly, yet we cant cull a few monsters from our shores.


Incorrect.



Fish before people.


There's absolutely no need to make that choice.

You're acting like an ignorant, hysterical imbecile.

Are you an ignorant, hysterical imbecile?

I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #49 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:59pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:56pm:
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:53pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:51pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:31pm:
The ocean is our playground and predators should be kept in check.
Hundreds of thousands of sharks are caught and have their fins sliced off and then thrown back alive to die slowly, yet we cant cull a few monsters from our shores.


Incorrect.



Fish before people.


There's absolutely no need to make that choice.

You're acting like an ignorant, hysterical imbecile.

Are you an ignorant, hysterical imbecile?

I'm curious.


People before fish.



Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #50 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 7:00pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:59pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:56pm:
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:53pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:51pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 6:31pm:
The ocean is our playground and predators should be kept in check.
Hundreds of thousands of sharks are caught and have their fins sliced off and then thrown back alive to die slowly, yet we cant cull a few monsters from our shores.


Incorrect.



Fish before people.


There's absolutely no need to make that choice.

You're acting like an ignorant, hysterical imbecile.

Are you an ignorant, hysterical imbecile?

I'm curious.


People before fish.





There's absolutely no need to make that choice.

You're acting like an ignorant, hysterical imbecile.

Are you an ignorant, hysterical imbecile?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #51 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 7:05pm
 
People get hysterical about a few sharks  being culled but are silent about this.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131477
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #52 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 7:08pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 7:05pm:
People get hysterical about a few sharks  being culled but are silent about this.


No they aren't.

Why lie?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #53 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 7:09pm
 
Why get all upset with an occasional shark attack?

More people die from mosquitos and the deseases they carry in the world than from sharks.

We should be more worried about a CULT that has killed far far more people than any number of sharks
And you cant even stay out of tge water, the CULT follows you and kills you.

CULL THE CULT, CULL THE CULT,  CULL THE CULT, CULL THE CULT

IT HAS A NICE RING TO IT
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
fezz
Senior Member
****
Offline


Where's my red hat?

Posts: 280
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #54 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 8:34pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


First off jeez, have you seen the results of WA's drum line cull from a couple of years back, out of 147 sharks caught, not one shark was a GW even though they were in "plague" numbers. Tigers and Bronzies were at the top of the list.
The GW that attacked my mate Ben Gerring was caught on a drum line, but that line was basically dropped on its head, although no conformation at all was given as to that GW was THE shark.

As for cutting up a large shark on a long line boat for bait, it's already being done ... the boats hitting swordfish are not exactly weekenders doing a run for an afternoon.

Powerheads I agree do a wonderfull job of blowing big holes in anything they come into contact with.

You made a comment about the Orcas attacking a GW off the Neptunes, now that really caused a major stir, no GWS were seen for over three months ... seems the best repellent for GWS is the predatory behaviour of Orcas. I surfed with a pod of about 20 Orcas off the western end of Rottnest, not once did I feel threatened ... let the body guard training begin.
Back to top
 

I would rather be poor and produce nothing than be an arsehole and conquer the world
 
IP Logged
 
fezz
Senior Member
****
Offline


Where's my red hat?

Posts: 280
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #55 - Apr 19th, 2017 at 8:45pm
 
I see a lot of cull advocates, here and alsewhere let fear dominate rationale ... get educated first before making knee jerk  calls either way.
There is plenty of info out now about GWS, on breeding grounds, on feeding grounds in conjunction with comprehensive tracking information. It's obvious to me the media is leading the way in fear mongering and demonising all sharks, getting as much mileage out of any shark interaction ... and the culling brigade fall for it hook, line and sinker.

If anyone here wants to be taken seriously, google is your friend ... if you're truly interested in becomig educated, you don't need me to hold your hand.
Back to top
 

I would rather be poor and produce nothing than be an arsehole and conquer the world
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #56 - Apr 22nd, 2017 at 1:46pm
 
fezz wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 8:34pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 19th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 10:35pm:
Johnnie wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
fezz wrote on Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:18pm:
Why is there no talk of putting GWS back on the catch list ... say with a system like with snapper in some areas. Take sharks between a certain size, eg 10' to 14'

I've been surfing for 35yrs, mostly in some of the most shark infested waters in Australia, and the world for that matter. Lost 4 good mates to GW attacks and one mate has survived an attack ... had a few close calls myself ... I think culling is a hoax myself, especially now we have a healthy, and building population of GWS.


Big sharks have to much mercury so fishermen don't want them, it has to be a cull, again I say we cant take all other fish and protect the pointer, how many surfers have to be eaten before the fisheries department do something.


You do know what fisherman want to use sharks this size for don't you? And do you realise how many are already caught by long liners as bycatch but can't be legally used, even though they do get used out in the open ocean away from prying eyes?  Give you a tip, swordfish love a bit of GW.

Culling has never worked and will never work with an ocean species in the big, wide ocean ... it might work for roos and goats and buffalo etc on a two dimensional plane but not in a three dimensional habitat that is the ocean.

Culling can be done easy with drum lines, they work a treat, or by luring them in like they do in Pt Lincoln for the tourists and then put a hole in their heads, a 44 would do the trick.
How do you fillet and store a 15ft shark to use as bait for sword fish Fez?


First off jeez, have you seen the results of WA's drum line cull from a couple of years back, out of 147 sharks caught, not one shark was a GW even though they were in "plague" numbers. Tigers and Bronzies were at the top of the list.
The GW that attacked my mate Ben Gerring was caught on a drum line, but that line was basically dropped on its head, although no conformation at all was given as to that GW was THE shark.

As for cutting up a large shark on a long line boat for bait, it's already being done ... the boats hitting swordfish are not exactly weekenders doing a run for an afternoon.

Powerheads I agree do a wonderfull job of blowing big holes in anything they come into contact with.

You made a comment about the Orcas attacking a GW off the Neptunes, now that really caused a major stir, no GWS were seen for over three months ... seems the best repellent for GWS is the predatory behaviour of Orcas. I surfed with a pod of about 20 Orcas off the western end of Rottnest, not once did I feel threatened ... let the body guard training begin.

It would be a brave operator carving up a pointer away from prying eyes, the fisheries department have very fast boats and airplanes, if caught you would loose all marine licenses, your money and possibly freedom.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20223
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Shark attacks
Reply #57 - Apr 25th, 2017 at 2:42pm
 
Back to top
 

1493071640963.jpeg (46 KB | 24 )
1493071640963.jpeg

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print