Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Should the global mods be more strict or less strict on suspending people for personal insults directed at other forum users?

more strict    
  16 (30.8%)
less strict    
  14 (26.9%)
undecided    
  3 (5.8%)
do it differently    
  11 (21.2%)
status quo    
  8 (15.4%)




Total votes: 52
« Last Modified by: freediver on: Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:16am »

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Send Topic Print
banning people (Read 7783 times)
The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 8908
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #60 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:14am
 
why fix something that aint broke?

don't give in to the people who bait others to get a response so that they can then run to the mods to get that person banned...

you know the ones I'm talking about..
Back to top
 

The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 36954
I like fish
Re: banning people
Reply #61 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:15am
 
Quote:
In any event, the pattern is clear,


No it isn't Aussie. Using your slippery logic you could also misrepresent it as saying a majority want it less strict. If you stick to what people actually say with their vote, there is no clear majority support for any option.

Quote:
How about you make it so people can change their vote FD?


I don't think that is an option.
Back to top
 

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man - George Bernard Shaw
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 36954
I like fish
Re: banning people
Reply #62 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:17am
 
I have allowed people to remove their vote. You can change it by removing your vote then voting again.
Back to top
 

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man - George Bernard Shaw
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 31126
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #63 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 11:49am
 
freediver wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:17am:
I have allowed people to remove their vote. You can change it by removing your vote then voting again.


If I had the option, my vote would have been more strict and do it differently.
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs. ~ A Member
A Member ~ kill every man woman and child, who is a Muslim.
A Member ~ I know if he had touched my kid he [taxi driver]would need an Ambulance
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 30419
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #64 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:24pm
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 11:49am:
freediver wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:17am:
I have allowed people to remove their vote. You can change it by removing your vote then voting again.


If I had the option, my vote would have been more strict and do it differently.


The 'Do it differently' clause means what exactly? With flowers and chocolate?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 31126
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #65 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:27pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:24pm:
Aussie wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 11:49am:
freediver wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:17am:
I have allowed people to remove their vote. You can change it by removing your vote then voting again.


If I had the option, my vote would have been more strict and do it differently.


The 'Do it differently' clause means what exactly? With flowers and chocolate?


I explained that up there ^^^^^^^ somewhere.
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs. ~ A Member
A Member ~ kill every man woman and child, who is a Muslim.
A Member ~ I know if he had touched my kid he [taxi driver]would need an Ambulance
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4579
Re: banning people
Reply #66 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:38pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:17am:
I have allowed people to remove their vote. You can change it by removing your vote then voting again.


It works.  I changed my vote from "more strict" (shouldn't that be "stricter"?) to "undecided", in other words "fence sitting" or "swaying in the breeze".  Wink
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4579
Re: banning people
Reply #67 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:41pm
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 11:49am:
freediver wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:17am:
I have allowed people to remove their vote. You can change it by removing your vote then voting again.


If I had the option, my vote would have been more strict and do it differently.


Why not just vote "undecided"?  Tongue
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 30419
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #68 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:46pm
 
Neferti wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:38pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:17am:
I have allowed people to remove their vote. You can change it by removing your vote then voting again.


It works.  I changed my vote from "more strict" (shouldn't that be "stricter"?) to "undecided", in other words "fence sitting" or "swaying in the breeze".  Wink



Jesus Christ.

Come on Neferti! - 'undurcided' is very Low Vibration for wanting others to decide the poll's outcome for you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 31126
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #69 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:49pm
 
So, Effendi, do you agree that according to your Poll (and you can see if has been impacted by socks....you know who voted for what) that 89.47% of your Members want the current position to change?

Where to from here, or was there some other reason you arranged the Poll of the Members?
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs. ~ A Member
A Member ~ kill every man woman and child, who is a Muslim.
A Member ~ I know if he had touched my kid he [taxi driver]would need an Ambulance
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4579
Re: banning people
Reply #70 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 4:10pm
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:49pm:
So, Effendi, do you agree that according to your Poll (and you can see if has been impacted by socks....you know who voted for what) that 89.47% of your Members want the current position to change?

Where to from here, or was there some other reason you arranged the Poll of the Members?


I wish to advise that I DID NOT vote with one of my dozens of "socks" ... nor did IQ. Did anyone check Aussie's multitude of "socks"?
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4579
Re: banning people
Reply #71 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 4:12pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:46pm:
Neferti wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 3:38pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:17am:
I have allowed people to remove their vote. You can change it by removing your vote then voting again.


It works.  I changed my vote from "more strict" (shouldn't that be "stricter"?) to "undecided", in other words "fence sitting" or "swaying in the breeze".  Wink



Jesus Christ.

Come on Neferti! - 'undurcided' is very Low Vibration for wanting others to decide the poll's outcome for you.


There wasn't an "I don't care" one to tick, Herbie. Life goes on, regardless.  Wink
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 30419
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #72 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 8:15pm
 
Neferti wrote on Apr 20th, 2017 at 4:12pm:
There wasn't an "I don't care" one to tick, Herbie. Life goes on, regardless.  Wink


If you durn't care, then tick the 'status quo' box or be accused of being a low vibration egg-laying reptile sleeping on a warm rock in a semi-comatose state of DUR low energy complacency.  Tongue

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 31126
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #73 - Apr 26th, 2017 at 6:13pm
 
Is anything to come out of this Thread/Poll, Effendi?
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs. ~ A Member
A Member ~ kill every man woman and child, who is a Muslim.
A Member ~ I know if he had touched my kid he [taxi driver]would need an Ambulance
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 36954
I like fish
Re: banning people
Reply #74 - Apr 26th, 2017 at 6:26pm
 
Yes Aussie. The members have given their feedback on how strict they think we should be.
Back to top
 

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man - George Bernard Shaw
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Send Topic Print