Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Should the global mods be more strict or less strict on suspending people for personal insults directed at other forum users?

more strict    
  17 (30.9%)
less strict    
  17 (30.9%)
undecided    
  3 (5.5%)
do it differently    
  10 (18.2%)
status quo    
  8 (14.5%)




Total votes: 55
« Last Modified by: freediver on: Apr 20th, 2017 at 9:16am »

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print
banning people (Read 19629 times)
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 46380
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #90 - Jun 16th, 2017 at 11:57pm
 
I still wonder why I got banned a few years ago?
No Mod owned up to it.
I took a guess that it was because FreeDumb and myself had a falling out after becoming good friends both on and off the Forum. A case of another female (Mod) chiming in on her behalf.


I hardly ever offer 'personal insults' unless its an obvious 'spammer' or 'troll' that turns up out of the blue just to bully someone.
I rarely use 'slang' against someone.

I do have the tendency to bowl Googly's and Wrong'uns, let alone Bouncers & Yorkers - just to rattle a discussion with another angle that is outside the box or circle. But that's me - I look at the subject from all four sides, before coming to a final decision or understanding.


...I do admit that I am the archetypal 'opposite' of It_Is_the_Light. I'm the Bad guy from the Dark Side that has faith in people that they deserve and can deal with the cold, scary, hard 'reality' and 'world' of ...the other side.

I am a racist. But I make sure I am so against 'every race' equally - just to put things into perspective.
It's a case of ...long ago, the lands were all 'one' Supercontinent called Pangaea. Then they 'separated' into many. Until we can accept the 'differences' - we will never see the 'one' again (to which the lands will eventually become one 'supercontinent' again).

Anyway - why was I banned?
Actually, don't bother - that's in the past now.
Good to be back.  Smiley
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15909
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #91 - Jun 17th, 2017 at 12:12am
 
Jasin wrote on Jun 16th, 2017 at 11:57pm:
I still wonder why I got banned a few years ago?
No Mod owned up to it.
I took a guess that it was because FreeDumb and myself had a falling out after becoming good friends both on and off the Forum. A case of another female (Mod) chiming in on her behalf.


I hardly ever offer 'personal insults' unless its an obvious 'spammer' or 'troll' that turns up out of the blue just to bully someone.
I rarely use 'slang' against someone.

I do have the tendency to bowl Googly's and Wrong'uns, let alone Bouncers & Yorkers - just to rattle a discussion with another angle that is outside the box or circle. But that's me - I look at the subject from all four sides, before coming to a final decision or understanding.


...I do admit that I am the archetypal 'opposite' of It_Is_the_Light. I'm the Bad guy from the Dark Side that has faith in people that they deserve and can deal with the cold, scary, hard 'reality' and 'world' of ...the other side.

I am a racist. But I make sure I am so against 'every race' equally - just to put things into perspective.
It's a case of ...long ago, the lands were all 'one' Supercontinent called Pangaea. Then they 'separated' into many. Until we can accept the 'differences' - we will never see the 'one' again (to which the lands will eventually become one 'supercontinent' again).

Anyway - why was I banned?
Actually, don't bother - that's in the past now.
Good to be back.  Smiley


If you really want to know and never worked it out give me a date, I'll get my shovel out.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
stunspore
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5089
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #92 - Jun 29th, 2017 at 10:29pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 17th, 2017 at 9:58am:
Should the global mods be more strict or less strict on suspending people for personal insults directed at other forum users?


More strict.  You should be presenting arguments/opinions of the issue, not other people.  Go elsewhere and troll.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 46380
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #93 - Jun 30th, 2017 at 9:38pm
 
stunspore wrote on Jun 29th, 2017 at 10:29pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 17th, 2017 at 9:58am:
Should the global mods be more strict or less strict on suspending people for personal insults directed at other forum users?


More strict.  You should be presenting arguments/opinions of the issue, not other people.  Go elsewhere and troll.


You can't tell FreeDiver to go elsewhere and troll.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 46380
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #94 - Jul 5th, 2017 at 9:11pm
 
If anyone should be banned.
It should be It_is_the_Light !

No other person on this Forum (inc Trolls)
is as weird and freakily scary as that crazed lunatic.
Even a Huntsman spider dropping from a sun-visor during a drive hasn't got a hairy leg on this member.  Shocked

Back to top
 

UnderPyramid.jpg (22 KB | 53 )
UnderPyramid.jpg

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 14879
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: banning people
Reply #95 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:23am
 
Jasin wrote on Jul 5th, 2017 at 9:11pm:
If anyone should be banned.
It should be It_is_the_Light !

No other person on this Forum (inc Trolls)
is as weird and freakily scary as that crazed lunatic.
Even a Huntsman spider dropping from a sun-visor during a drive hasn't got a hairy leg on this member.  Shocked



I checked my visors before getting into the car for nearly 6 months after that happened to me...

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #96 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 9:14pm
 
we should have a banned sub forum..

when you get sin binned for a day or 3 you can go to the sub form and see who is banned and for how long...
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #97 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 9:25pm
 
stunspore wrote on Jun 29th, 2017 at 10:29pm:
More strict.  You should be presenting arguments/opinions of the issue, not other people.  Go elsewhere and troll.


Hear Hear.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 46380
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #98 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 9:39pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:23am:
Jasin wrote on Jul 5th, 2017 at 9:11pm:
If anyone should be banned.
It should be It_is_the_Light !

No other person on this Forum (inc Trolls)
is as weird and freakily scary as that crazed lunatic.
Even a Huntsman spider dropping from a sun-visor during a drive hasn't got a hairy leg on this member.  Shocked

[url][/img]


I checked my visors before getting into the car for nearly 6 months after that happened to me...

[img]https://m.popkey.co/c69cd6/YRRxg.gif[/url]


Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15909
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #99 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 10:51pm
 
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jul 6th, 2017 at 9:14pm:
we should have a banned sub forum..

when you get sin binned for a day or 3 you can go to the sub form and see who is banned and for how long...


I have no prob with that with the provision that it's just statements of fact and anyone who uses information in that subforum against members is instantly added to the list.

But I don't make the rules.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #100 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 10:57pm
 
Where are these Rules?  People seem not to know what is expected.  Is there some Rule about referring (even in a neutral way and actually quoting them) to a Member's Family?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15909
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #101 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:18pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 6th, 2017 at 10:57pm:
Where are these Rules?  People seem not to know what is expected.  Is there some Rule about referring (even in a neutral way and actually quoting them) to a Member's Family?


Here's a clue, if you are civil, you will in all likelihood, never get a ban.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #102 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:26pm
 
Setanta wrote on Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:18pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 6th, 2017 at 10:57pm:
Where are these Rules?  People seem not to know what is expected.  Is there some Rule about referring (even in a neutral way and actually quoting them) to a Member's Family?


Here's a clue, if you are civil, you will in all likelihood, never get a ban.


Oh, okay....civil.  And what happens if you are not 'civil?'  And can you tell me where that word....'civil'.....is mentioned in the Rules.

Come on Setanta......civility went out the window here decades ago.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15909
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #103 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:31pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:26pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:18pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 6th, 2017 at 10:57pm:
Where are these Rules?  People seem not to know what is expected.  Is there some Rule about referring (even in a neutral way and actually quoting them) to a Member's Family?


Here's a clue, if you are civil, you will in all likelihood, never get a ban.


Oh, okay....civil.  And what happens if you are not 'civil?'  And can you tell me where that word....'civil'.....is mentioned in the Rules.

Come on Setanta......civility went out the window here decades ago.



Unfortunately. Lets give it a try and we'll lead by example eh?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: banning people
Reply #104 - Jul 6th, 2017 at 11:43pm
 
No Rule.

Cry

Yet people get banned....for breaching non existent Rules.

Pretty hard to cope with as a Member.

Embarrassed
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print