Bobby. wrote on Jan 14
th, 2019 at 6:22pm:
Dnarever wrote on Jan 14
th, 2019 at 6:19pm:
Quote:Does OzPol care about blatant racism and trolling?
I would think Ozpol cares a lot about racists trolls.
We have some of the greatest exponents of the art.
There are no racists on Ozpolitic -
just people fed up with multiculturalism causing
Sudanese home invasions.
People advocating for ethnic cleansing, using racial stereotypes when the facts don't support their feels and using language that is historically and culturally racist and discriminatory in the highest order, no, that's not racist...
????
I'm all for the free exchange of ideas, but if they can't articulate their points without doing the above, I hate to break it to you, but they're racist. If their "feels not reals" are racist, that says all you need to know about them.
If someone thinks that Sudanese gangs are a problem then that should be a valid topic of discussion. But when the actual crime statistics, for example, don't support the ferocity of their claims and they start using racial slurs to try and fill the void their lack of evidence opens up with racially charged feels, how does that do anything to help the situation?
I know this is the Internet, and we're in a post-facts world (thanks in a large part to Trump), but it doesn't have to be a racist one. And if they cared about the actual issue, they should be even more determined to get to the facts in order to propose a solution that resolved the actual issue, not just target an ethnic, religious or racial group they've had to lie about because they want a white Australia and are looking for ways to claim they're not racist in doing so.
But if the rules are optional, can we at least remove the swear filters so I can tell people being racist buggerwits the type of worthless front bottoms they actually are?