Coral Sea wrote on Feb 12
th, 2018 at 1:52am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 11
th, 2018 at 3:54pm:
I am not in favour of censoring debate, buy if you have to be racist to make your point you've already lost.
This is
incorrect.
It stems from the fact that to you, "equality" is a
religious sacrament.
What does your incorrect notions of equality have to do with why you use racial slurs and the weakness that immediately puts your argument in?
And equality is a religious sacrament? So you think, but you're wrong. Religious messages are far mixed to claim that. I am as anti-religious as it gets. Even if you consider it a religious notion as in there is no objective reason to support such a position other than "you have to" and not part of any specific faith you're wrong there too.
Before I go even further, I'm making an assumption here, but you post like we have a different interpretation of what equality means. You post as if to you it means an unfair advantage to non-whites and anyone who supports equality is anti-white.
To me it just means a level playing field for everyone. Someone's success depends on their own hard work, not the colour of their skin, their gender or whatever other roadblocks have been ingrained in our societies. To many who are accustomed to having the advantages of being the benificiaries of the lack of equality, I can see how a level playing field for all may be an uncomfortable notion.
For the alt-right who go on about hard work, being self made yadda yadda, you'd think they'd support equality. But like their demands of free speech etc, they only like it when it directly helps them or their cause. There is no genuine care of free speech, or "hard work", it's all bullshit.
And no, let me stop you there, equality doesn't mean open borders.
There will always be differences between people and nations but if humanity wants any sort of longevity we have to work together.
And no, I don't mean a one world government and no I'm not a globalist or whatever other label you want to throw around to dismiss what I'm saying.
When we had rocks and sticks and were nomadic tribes yes, survival of the fittest and forced procreation and the other baser animal instincts were important to grow the human race, but with an estimated 9 billion people on the planet by 2050 we need to find a better way.
Going backwards to ways and notions that may have worked in the 60's, be they how we treat or "control" women, or even overtly nationalist trade policies, they just won't work in today's world. They barely worked then.
And I know what you'll say, the Liberals had their chance and look at the mess we're in, well yes, but also no. Did the Liberals in the last, let's only go back 3 terms, did they ever get to enact the policies they started with? NO. They always got watered down or sabotaged by the conservatives to pass into law. Even Obamacare was one of them.
No side can claim superiority here. This is why today more than ever, the facts and the reality of the situations is the most important thing.
Quote:Racism is objectively correct. That is to say:
*Race exists
*Racial differences exist
*Racial differences have real world implications
There was a time when I'd say, "I'm not racist, but," or, "I am a race realist."
No more.
Liberals aren't interested in debate. They use the word racist the way witch-burners used the word heretic.
So I am reclaiming the term racist the way negros reclaimed the slur n@#$er.
Well good luck with that. Again, it isn't hard to have a debate on immigration if you rely on the facts and evidence. It's when you start using the racial slurs or cannot support your position with anything else but fear and discrimination that people will tune out.
Yes, there are plenty on the left that make me hate that I sit on the left of the middle and it's hard to think I get lumped with them. Let the Milo's of the world speak, let them share their message. We can't grow if we don't listen. The alt-right aren't perfect either.
Quote:You want to suppress, suppress, suppress.
Some do, but not me. I just take issue with the racial slurs. I've said it before, if you have to use them to make your point rather than rely on the fact, you've already lost.
Quote:The truth, however, does not care about your religious zealotry.
We agree there. But let's not forget that much of the racism you're trying to reclaim has been justified by religion just as much if not more than equality is. If I'm a religious zealot then so are you.
Quote:SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 11
th, 2018 at 3:54pm:
I made the mistake of trying to treat you with respect in my posts, I won't fall for that again because you're clearly not deserving of it or capable of showing it in return.
Nonsense. You nearly immediately resorted to armchair psychology, a favorite tactic of liberal scum.
I gave you a chance but you admitted that you were just trolling. You can't simply talk with a troll... That's not how it works. You should know that better than anyone. Don't like it, stop trolling, pretty simple.
Again, another example of the double standard, you love to troll but can't take someone not even trolling you, but simply shining the spotlight on you not the topic at hand?
Do you need a sitdown snowflake? How about a safe space?
Please...