Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 27
th, 2017 at 5:12pm:
Stupid to ban meat. It is a hippy thing I suppose.
I predict this silly decision will be reversed soon.
Are you reacting to the thread title or the OP?
Because if you are reacting to the thread title, i agree.
If you are reacting to the OP, how so? Doesn't it make sense for the Ministry of the Environment to be as environmentally friendly as possible?
Considering:
"Animal agriculture is a leading cause of climate change and environmental degradation globally. Livestock like cattle produce methane as a byproduct of digesting their food, and methane is an incredibly potent greenhouse gas — 86 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20 year period. Globally, the livestock sector alone accounts for 14.5 percent of all human-related greenhouse gas emissions. And it’s not just the methane from cow burps or manure that contributes to animal agriculture’s carbon footprint, it’s the fossil fuels required to ship, process, package, and refrigerate the meat as well.
Animal agriculture also contributes to land and water degradation by encouraging the clearing of large tracts of land for livestock grazing and production of animal feed.
In Brazil, one of the world’s largest cattle producers, huge swaths of Amazon rain forest have been cut down to make way for cattle range land and soy plantations, meant to grow feed for cattle. And grazing can also lead to soil degradation, with the United Nations estimating that some 20 percent of the world’s grazing lands have become degraded since 1945. Degraded soil doesn’t hold nutrients as well as healthy soil, leading to increased agricultural and nutrient runoff and water pollution. And degraded soil also doesn’t store carbon as well as healthy soil, which in turn contributes to climate change.
A study released in August of 2015 went so far as to suggest that meat eaters are the number one cause of worldwide species extinction, due in part to habitat destruction fueled by animal agriculture."