John Smith wrote on Jan 24^th, 2017 at 10:43am:


In the4, 10, 20, 40 to 60 thousand years Aboriginals claim to have occupied this continent & the last 2 hundred years there has been no recorded evidence of Aboriginals building anything but rudimentary timber & bark gunyahs.

All of a sudden some so called expert declares some stone ruins on islands in the Dampier Archipelago as being built by Aboriginals ....... nothing where the populous groups are on the mainland

but out on some islands.

The Bradshaw rock art in the Kimberly once formerly shrugged off by local Aboriginals as "rubbish paintings" have now been claimed as done by Aboriginals.

Bush Tucker Man Les Hiddens did a good program on this. The people depicted in the paintings had nothing ion common with any other rock art in Australia or the territory ....

in fact it had more similarity to Malagasy origins. 

And we all know there were many seafarers that came to our shores before the English & other Europeans.

This is just fanciful malarky dreamt up by some so called scientist looking for his 15 minutes.

As I said you numpties would believe anything, including that Aboriginals had their own Universities over 200 years ago.

Honestly the only people here in denial are yourself, Peccar & Mothballs.

Disneylanders the lot of you -

Tall tales & true from your imaginary past.

Valkie wrote on Jan 24^th, 2017 at 6:18pm:


LOL

John Smith wrote on Jan 24^th, 2017 at 8:53pm:


Why do you suppose after 10k years there's so few examples of those dwellings?

John Smith wrote on Jan 24^th, 2017 at 8:41pm:
Im not sure you are understanding this too well, 1 archeologist, perhaps 2 claim that these structures were built by aboriginals. That is not in dispute despite Mothras convenient lying. There is zero peer agreement amongst experts. get it now? Its a claim, an unverified claim by someone who found some rocks, rearranged them and then claimed they were a house with 1 metre high walls. Its easy enough, I didnt have to tell you this, its fact all readily available in the articles Mothra posted, I even linked to the relevant info if you go back in this thread. You need to read John before you go charging in defense of your fair maiden.

John Smith wrote on Jan 24^th, 2017 at 8:53pm:
who is this "expert" you keep talking about?

rhino wrote on Jan 24^th, 2017 at 8:59pm:




Ohh, I understand perfectly. I understand that a claim by one or two archelogists bares a hell of a lot more weight than a claim made by you .... especially given that you have no idea what they base their claim on ... perhaps you should read the whole article ... pay particular attention to the bit that says Although the researchers haven’t yet published a paper there should be more information released as the team find it, and they will hopefully publish a paper in the next few months.


you have no idea what they're basing their claim on but you are calling their claim bullshit ... how fkken stupid can you be?

john, show who these experts are. Why are you dodging the question?