Aussie wrote on Dec 11
th, 2016 at 10:11pm:
Aussie wrote on Dec 11
th, 2016 at 9:53pm:
Here's an analogy you might prefer. As a GMod, you warn a Member not to do something. Said Member defies you. You ban.
Why did you ban? Who initiated the ban?
Setanta?
Aussie this would have to be the stupidest analogy you could have come up with. Said member would be banned for doing whatever it is they did to defy the mods - analogous to Toben denying the holocaust.
To bring it home for you, suppose we implemented a rule against denying the holocaust. A person denied the holocaust. We told them to stop. They defied us, and continued denying the holocaust. Would you seriously argue that said member was not banned for denying the holocaust? Or would common sense kick in? Think before answering.
No matter how desperately you wanted to support the ban on holocaust denial by pretending it was not the cause of the ban, no amount of BS would separate the outcome from the cause. You have your blinkers on Aussie, but that doesn't make everyone else equally blind.
Quote:Oh! More moving of the goal posts!
I've given you links to the core cases, freediver. You cannot manipulate them.
I am still asking your opinion, just like before. You are still afraid to offer your opinion, just like before. Are you afraid to think for yourself Aussie, in case you prove yourself wrong? What do you think caused the court order? Last time you produced evidence, it turned out that it directly supported what I was saying on the matter. No wonder you will not even quote your own evidence now. You would have to read it first, and even worse, understand what it is saying.