freediver wrote on Dec 16
th, 2016 at 12:47pm:
You are the one who is struggling.
not at all ... I've told you my position many times. That you refuse to believe it is your problem
John Smith wrote on Dec 15
th, 2016 at 11:39pm:
legislation are the rules that we live by. Without them we would have anarchy. Whether you agree with the judges decision or not, you cannot allow someone to ignore a court order.
John Smith wrote on Dec 15
th, 2016 at 11:39pm:
In the end you don't have to agree with the consequences, but as long as you are aware of the consequences and you continue to do whatever you are doing that makes you a subject of those consequences, then you cannot whinge that you are being hard done by
John Smith wrote on Dec 15
th, 2016 at 11:11pm:
no, i mean there are consequences to his actions. I'm not sure why you struggle with this so much. He can say what he likes, he just has to be willing to suffer the consequences for what he says.
John Smith wrote on Dec 15
th, 2016 at 9:24pm:
of course he is. And he did.
John Smith wrote on Dec 15
th, 2016 at 8:29pm:
freedom is a ideology that has nothing to do with the modern world we live in. We live in a society bound by rules and regulations. Without it society cannot function. Sure, he can ignore the court order, but there will be consequences to his actions.
John Smith wrote on Dec 14
th, 2016 at 11:03pm:
He's free to say what he likes. He's also free to follow court orders, or not. Just don't cry when he suffers consequences for it.
Raven wrote on Dec 14
th, 2016 at 12:56pm:
Freediver what you seem to fail to grasp is that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence.
Do you believe that you should be able to say whatever you want with absolutely zero consequence?
and there are probably a dozen other comments by me that explain my position. Not sure how many times I have to repeat them to you. Are you pretending not to understand because to do otherwise would be to concede your position, or are you really that thick?