Just a small question here - why are they automatically labeled White SUPREMACISTS, when all other social groups are Entitled ™ to be titled Activists and are automatically accorded 'Accredited Victim Status'?
Is it not more the case that White Activists or whatever are defending, by their own lights, their 'civilisation', 'culture' and so forth?
What exactly is 'supremacist' about defending your own (perceived) group when others have an apparent free run? This is the kind of twisted thinking and 'labeling' that has crept into our society since the advent of Rampant Feminism... an issue that struck me when listening to the British guy Herb posted a video about - when he discussed the propensity of Muslims living in the West to be on the attack constantly while playing the victim.... somehow ........ that rings a very long distant bell here in the West - as regards how we've allowed this kind of 'negotiation' to creep into and effectively destroy any reasoned discussion of issues.
I believe it's called appeasement and it didn't work with Hitler, it hasn't worked with the Feminists ™, and it won't work with the Muslims.... sorry 'bout that... all that happens when you allow some person or group to constantly create 'issues', then play the victim card, and even throw the entire resources of the State behind that person or group to 'resolve' their self-created 'issues', often by violence and disempowerment of others in society - is feed their insanity.
The West is in desperate need of an overhaul.... and has been its own worst enemy for forty odd years now, since the appeasement of Feminism ™ began here.... it has lost its way and its balls.... and no wonder the Muslims think we are fair game and weak.....
(chortles at the dire situation 'feminist' Sweden and Germany etc have created for themselves....)
... and that's MY 18c worth for today....!!