Jesus, I thought the Burka was bad. But when you're in a cult you're in a cult:

It's 1856 all over again.

More here:
http://www.catholichomeandgarden.com/catholic_modesty.htm

You just love your patriarchy so much. Don't you, monkey boy?

Don't know about Catholics but I heard that the Amish supported Trump

The patriachy is how things are supposed to function.

Men , in the real world (not the mass media hollywood version) eventually come to discover that they cant have a successful relationship with a woman if they put her first.
This isnt some "ra, ra, ra men" statement.
I would prefer to put the woman first , but there is a deep resentment that grows in a woman when a man puts her first.
A man has to have a mission
he has to have a north star.
And this purpose cannot be "his woman".

A woman, on the other hand , should put her man first.
He will respond well to this and it is the basis of a great relationship.

Women , at their core, dont want to win. they want to be with a winner.

A needy guy, a clingy guy, a guy who does not have firm personal boundaries is garbage to a woman.

a woman will "sh*t test' a man to see if he is the real deal.
She will try bratty behaviour or bitchy behaviour and she will expect her man to 'correct this behaviour". She will resent him if he doesnt. She will gain attraction by his firm discipline of this emotional behaviour and she will get aroused. All "real" men know this. women will often be very bratty and very bitchy as part of their foreplay and if they sense a 'weak ' male...he is treated with disdain.

So , to recap.
men are natural leaders.
women look to men as emotional anchors
men who try to be an emotional tampon to a woman, who try to be her "girlfriend" are sewing the seeds of a catastrophe.
men should stay on their mission (which is to lead our patriachal society) and let women enjoy their feminine energy.
Most angry women, most bitter women, are that way because they dont have that strong masculine energy to ground them.

Hillsong cult church Longy ?

Frank wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 7:54am:


The numbers thing alone says it all. Women who dress like that in the west are an aberration compared to the Islamic world.

Frank wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 8:42am:


See the anger almost escalate into violence?  I wonder what would happen if someone wore a mo tshirt to the mosque.

Marla wrote on Dec 2^nd, 2016 at 11:18am:


Looking over what was on offer, I have to say its not all that bad, and no more ridiculous than a skirt in which the wearer cannot sit down, because her crutch will be on public view.

Fifty years ago, feminism was going to liberate women from the shackles imposed by a patriarchal society, yet fetishism and traditional glamour still dominate woman's fashion today. These things are supposed to be imposed by men as well as these conservative offerings shown in the link. There has always been a double standard when it comes to how women dress. They are not quite seasonal as other creatures, but everyone knows that women show off more flesh when attracting a mate. Religious modesty notwithstanding, that is human nature.


Meanwhile, is there anything uglier than stilettos and pointed toes? Do men force women to wear them? The fact is, there is no accounting for taste . . . unless it is imposed by God Freaks.