longweekend58 wrote on Nov 28
th, 2016 at 6:42pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 28
th, 2016 at 6:00pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Nov 28
th, 2016 at 5:39pm:
Im enjoying watching you applaud communism and communist dictators. It would be difficult to be more discredited if you tried.
I'm not "applauding" anything other than it's successes. I am quite willing to acknowledge it's failures as well, longweekend. I am, unlike most, attempting to be fair. As I keep pointing out, Castro was an excellent revolutionary but a failure as a government leader. He had his advantages and his disadvantages.
You dont seem to be talking too much about its very, very long list of failures including the effective absence of freedom. Why dont you talk about that just for a change. And Cubans only have very limited access to internet and it is in PUBLIC where they can be monitored.
Freedom. Look it up. Cuba doesnt know what it means.
Freedom is relative at the best, Longweekend. Cubans under Castro were freer than they were under Batista. Batista was a failed real-estate agent from Daytona Florida (a career he returned to after he left Havana). He was also a thug and in the pocket of the Mafia (primarily from New York). If you spoke out against Batista you either "disappeared" or were killed in the street. If you weren't one of the ruling oligarchy, you weren't allowed to learn how to read or attend school. If you were female and poor and pretty you invariably ended up as a prostitute. There was no chance to advance yourself or you family. You were too poor to own land and invariably starved. There was little freedom of speech, association and political belief.
Under Castro, schools were free, medical care was free, there was no prostitution, the Mafia owned gambling joints were either closed down or nationalised. You were taught to read and educated. Medical care was free. Cubans in the sugar industry controlled and advanced. Cubans were proud to be Cubans, whether black, white or in between. What freedoms did they lack? They had freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of religion. They had freedom of movement within Cuba and could even leave Cuba if they could afford the exit visa. The only real freedom they lacked was political association - a not insignificant one but one which they are finding again.
Today, Cubans have far more freedom than they did at the start of the Revolution. A fact that most critics of Fidel and the Fidelistas refuse to achnowledge, preferring to paint the regime as the blackest of totalitarian, 1984 like, worse than the DPRK even. What is required is balance and that is sadly lacking from most of the criticism of the Fidelistas. Sure they had their problems but it must be acknowledged they had their successes as well. Are you prepared to do that?
I agree with most of this, except the claim that there was no prostitution. Rather there was much
prostitution - it's not called the oldest profession for nothing..
I would like any critics of the Castro regime to explain to me how the Cuban people were better off under the rule of Batista. Not just individuals or special interest groups, but the people as a whole......Anyone?