Panther wrote on Dec 11
th, 2016 at 12:59pm:
I've always said..,...if you have a violent mental illness history, or you have been diagnosed as mentally ill, you should never be permitted to own or use a firearm, or any type of weapon for that matter.
So, you support the confiscation of firearms from the "mentally ill"?
Quote:Also, if you have a criminal record, especially a violent criminal history, & you have served 1 year or more in prison, you should never be permitted to own or use a firearm, or any type of weapon for that matter.
So, that covers legal firearms. 1 year appears rather arbitrary though. Surely it should be on the seriousness of the crime?
Quote:Everyone else, male or female of age, who wishes to own, keep, &/or carry a firearm should not be kept from doing so after passing an extensive background check, to be conducted & completed within a short, but reasonable time....say 3 to 5 days. The potential gun owner needs not provide any reason(s) for desiring said firearms, & if stated willfully & voluntarily, the potential use for self-defense would be a completely acceptable reason, & never preclude them from ownership.
http://www.33sm.ml/smileys/cleanteeth09.gif So, no restrictions on the type of firearm that can be owned? No regulation as far as age is concerned? No regulation as far as training/ability is concerned?
Quote:That's quite restrictive in my view.....but not for some bed-wetters. You appear to oppose the regulated ownership of firearms (ie, you support essentially unregulated ownership). My, how American of you and so at odds with what the overwhelming majority of Australians believe...