Good god you're disgusting.

AiA wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 10:22pm:
forced sterilisation of those with low IQs.

Dawkins is for it Quote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

rhino wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 10:12pm:


There is no problem that requires "solving".   Perhaps we should ask how we can solve your problems instead?   

AiA wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 10:22pm:
forced sterilisation of those with low IQs.

rhino wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 10:12pm:


There is no problem that requires "solving".   Perhaps we should ask how we can solve your problems instead?   

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 10:44pm:
sure, there no problem. A 45 million dollar rebuilt school just got trashed in Kalgoorlie by feral abo kids. All under 10 years of age. The list goes on.

rhino wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:


Schools have been trashed by white kids, by Asian kids, by African kids, by Eskimo kids, by Native American kids.  It occurs all over the world, all the time.   Perhaps we need to address why kids of all kinds do this, rather than just single out Indigenous children?   

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 11:39pm:
The damage done by feral abos is out of all proportion to their numbers, most of these people are technically retarded, of course they cant bring up their kids properly.

rhino wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 11:41pm:


Considering that it was the Stolen Generations policies which destroyed many of their family lives until a generation ago, it's not surprising that they often have disjointed, dysfunctional families you realise? 

Seriously good idea. Abo problem, solved in 1 generation.

[
Really?  Lucky you.  Lucky them.  The Human Rights Commission however reported differently on the interviews they conducted as part of the "Bringing Them Home" report.  How about you realise that not everybody had the same experience of the nobless oblige' of white society.   

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 21^st, 2016 at 12:01am:
Thats not my point. we prevent retarded people from breeding and most aboriginals fit into this category. Why are we enabling them? what are we getting out of this deal? Higher crime, higher level of family dysfunction, etc etc. they dont contribute to society in any way shape or form.

rhino wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 11:41pm:


Considering that it was the Stolen Generations policies which destroyed many of their family lives until a generation ago, it's not surprising that they often have disjointed, dysfunctional families you realise? 

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 21^st, 2016 at 12:02am:
They are a sub species of humanity, very lucky they were offered this opportunity to integrate.

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 21^st, 2016 at 5:25pm:
Aborigines and PNG's have the highest amount of Neanderthal DNA of any existing group of modern humans.

To the ladies here, would you have a baby with this?

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 21^st, 2016 at 5:25pm:
I didnt state they werent 100 percent human. You poorly understand this, aboriginals are a sub species of humanity. They are unique.

Dawkins is for it Quote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

AiA wrote on Oct 20^th, 2016 at 10:55pm:
have a look around, our welfare state encourages the dummies to breed, not the smart people. The people having all the children are those being cradled on welfare. This cant go on, the people consuming all our tax dollars and resources are non contributors to society.

Valkie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2016 at 8:12am:

you are kidding yourself. 3 percent of the population consume 50 percent of the resources and contribute nothing. It has to end.

Two?

Valkie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2016 at 8:12am:

you are kidding yourself. 3 percent of the population consume 50 percent of the resources and contribute nothing. It has to end.

regardless of the motive , it failed. You cant make toffee out of dogsh!t

Valkie wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2016 at 5:47am:


Two are examples of multiple Generations going back to nearly the time of the establishment of the first colony.

Two examples which you cannot disprove so instead you attempt to denigrate them.  How typical of the right-wing when they lose an argument.   Tsk, tsk.  No honesty there at all.   

Valkie wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2016 at 5:35pm:


The historical record, the admissions from the state and federal government and the recollections of the victims of these policies all disprove your claims.   The problem with proving the existence of the Stolen Generations is because of the government(s) of the day "losing the records", not keeping records of sufficient detail, passing legislation which enabled them to undertake these policies, thereby rendering them, at the time, legal, etc.  Of course, this all very convenient for you and them but the majority of Australians now accept that children were removed for racist reasons and that they suffered as a consequence.   Time you admitted that as well.   

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2016 at 5:40pm:


Now we are into conspiracy theories.

My final comment as Im sick of banging my head against a brick wall.

Deny that Aboriginal children were and are still abused by their own.

Deny that many of the so called stolen generation were better off and had a better and more stable upbringing.

Deny , in the current parasitic relationship the Aboriginals have with Australia, that they will never be any better unless they get off their collective asses and do fo themselves.
Something they cannot do when being held back by their lazy, primitive parents.

The stolen generation was a crock, you know it but for some reason, possibly personal investment, you refuse to accept it.

And you still have not commented on that other great myth, SECRET WOMEN'S BUSINESS.
This is probably for the same reason, you know it was just a scam, scams are the foundation of Aboriginl claims.

Secret indigenous womens business. Did I ever tell you all about my year 9 footy trip to Dubbo and what happened on the oval near the blue light disco?

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 24^th, 2016 at 7:02pm:


Nope.  Where appropriate I utilise statistical evidence.  However, there are no statistics available which I have found which prove this point. 

Muslims in Australia are just ordinary, everyday people who worship a different god to what the overwhelming majority of Australians worship. 

As an officer of the British Army in 1897 and 1898, he fought against a Pashtun tribe in the northwest frontier of British India and also at the Battle of Omdurman in Sudan. In both of those conflicts he had eye-opening encounters with Muslims. These incidents allowed his keen powers of observation and always-fluid pen to weigh in on the subject of Islamic society.

While these words were written when he was only 25-years-old (in 1899), they serve as a prophetic warning to Western civilization today.

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism (Islam) lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.”

Churchill apparently witnessed the same phenomenon in several places he visited. “The effects are apparent in many countries: improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.”

He saw the temporal and the eternal tainted by their belief system. “A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity,” he wrote.

The second-class status of women also grated at the young officer. “The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men,” he noted.

“Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”

Well before the birth of modern Israel, its terror tactics and drive for world domination were felt. “Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”

Churchill’s quotations are from “The River War,” Volume II, pages 248-250, published by Longmans, Green & Company, 1899.

Muslims depend on your ignorance to feed you the poison like a piece of chocolate. Muslims need and must tell you these utopian imaginary sweet sounding things about Islam either to stop you from resisting their plans or to convert you to Islam, or both.

Never forget the following fact: The more a Muslim is devout and religious, the more they become dangerous, full of hatred and has tendency to violence…

Thousands of times I heard Muslims living in the west, their non-Muslim apologists, western politicians and the western mainstream media repeat the following statement : The vast majority of Muslims are moderate peace loving people and only a tiny minority are “extremists”:

A Muslim generally, as his holy texts command, can never befriend a kaffir (non-Muslim). TO them, you are a “kaffir”, and the “Kaffir” in the Quran is UNCLEAN… They believe hell fire is your final destiny, the only reason why they may smile to you is to proselytize you “Dawah or Daawa دعوة” . This is a religious duty to all Muslims; to try to convert non-Muslims to Islam or at least to try to stop you from defending yourself and to let them achieve their goal quietly and to neutralize you . As it is mentioned in verse 3:28: from the Quran: “Let not the believers take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them…”.

This hypocrisy is widely used and encouraged in Islam when dealing with kaffirs. it’s called “Taqqiyah“ and it is widely used by muslims in non-Islamic countries.

Taqiya

Taqiya (Arabic: تقیة‎‎ taqiyyah/taqīyah, literally "prudence, fear, caution")[1][2] is an Islamic term referring to precautionary dissimulation or denial of religious belief and practice in the face of persecution.[3][4][1][5] Another term for this concept, kitmān (lit. "action of covering, dissimulation"), has a more specific meaning of dissimulation by silence or omission.[6][7]

This practice is emphasized in Shia Islam whereby adherents are permitted to conceal their religion when under threat of persecution or compulsion.[3][8] However, it is also permitted in Sunni Islam under certain circumstances.[9][10]

Taqiyya was initially practiced under duress by some of Muhammad's Companions.[11] Later, it became particularly important for Shias due to their experience as a persecuted religious minority.[8][12] According to Shia doctrine, taqiyya is permissible in situations where there is overwhelming danger of loss of life or property and where no danger to religion would occur thereby.[8] Taqiyya has also been politically legitimised, particularly among Twelver Shias, in order to maintain unity among Muslims and fraternity among the Shia clerics.[13][14]

Quote:

[Source]

As usual, Valkie's bigotry betrays him...