... and not just for the murder of humans.

Some people just do not deserve the privileges and comforts that come with living in modern Western civilisation with all of its many enjoyments.

These people are monsters in human form who should be aborted just as happens by the thousands each year when monsters are born in maternity operating rooms.



link

I reckon deer was hit by a car then the decorations added postmortem, which doesn't excuse them being sickfks.

If I hit a deer like someone did in Bondi Junction the other week, I'd slice of a nice cut of venison for my dinner.

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/police-investigate-after-deer-killed-by-car-on-busy-ro...

On the death penalty, I don't believe in a state administered death penalty because when politics get involves bad decisions will be made.

I do however believe in the ideal of the death penalty for immediate acts of blind fury revenge.

I'm sure If someone hurt a hair on the head of any of my family and I had the opportunity, I'd happily channel 'Mick Taylor' with them in my basement.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 16^th, 2016 at 12:56pm:


Wolf Creek.

I agree, totally.

Every politician should be put to death .......now.

These sub human creatures have learned to completely immerse their snouts and heads into the feed trough and still breath.
Its disgusting, they have somehow managed to evolve so that they can talk out of their Asssses.

No wonder everything they say is shite.

Putting them down would be a mercy on all humans.
And probably save the planet, all in one

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 16^th, 2016 at 3:44pm:


With regard to animal cruelty?

Gnads wrote on Oct 16^th, 2016 at 7:34pm:


link

They should have been gassed in a hyperbaric chamber.

link

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 16^th, 2016 at 12:38pm:
And yet you condone torture of these criminals. Is that civilised?

I believe  in common sense. We put down vicious dogs.

And speaking of road-kill ... Years before the war a friend of my father's was driving at night along a gun-barrel highway between paddy-fields in northern China when he heard a *BANG!*.

He kept on driving, as one did in those parts where bandits were plentiful. A couple of hours later he arrived home and found a boy's arm embedded in the front vertical grill that cooled the radiator ...

Not everything that goes *bump* in the night is a ghost or a burglar.

Its time wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 9:49am:


I backed out after 5 seconds.

How anyone can support this barbaric practice is beyond me.

Very, very disturbed individuals.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 9:54am:


Should have got popcorn

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 10:37am:


Ok. Non GM popcorn.

A couple of 7.62 mm rounds will do a better, more efficient job than that bullsh1t.


But, I bet he got a better death than his victims. 

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 10:46am:


Maybe he prefers a good ISIS beheading video.  Much better production values.

Its time wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 9:49am:


This is not a real execution , but a reconstruction by anti capital punishment campaigners.   

Belgarion wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 11:04am:


They should have hired the ISIS guy who directed  the cage video.  That should have won an Oscar.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 10:54am:



Calm you vagina young lady, just stating a fact, not justifying.

No need to blubber, champ. It's all over now.

Its time wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 9:49am:


Sure will, but first let me say that I'm sorry but I'll be a little late in presenting the video of this guy abducting a 9-year old on her way home from school by pulling her into his shag-wagon panel-van, and then driving her to a local National Park like the Belanglo State Forest, and then raping every orifice of her body over a period of hours before finally crushing her skull with a rock.

Thank you in advance for being patient.

Note: I believe in the Death Penalty for what I believe deserves the ultimate penalty, and not what others believe or what is American law in certain States.

BigOl64 wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 10:49am:


The firing squad was Timothy McVeigh's exit-of-choice because he was a stand-up guy who didn't want to take it lying down. He had class.

We've all seen any number of firing squad executions from WWII footage, and it was always the case that the war criminals or spies dropped like a brick and were dead before they hit the ground.

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 12:27pm:


The country is irrelevant.

There is no place in civilised society for the premeditated, state-sanctioned killing of prisoners/criminals, no matter how heinous the crime.

Whether it be Australia, Indonesia, Canada, Iran, USA, Somalia, New Zealand, Qatar, or any other country.

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 12:48pm:


Again, you're looking at the crime instead of the punishment.

Also, one man's executioner is another man's murderer.

If you had your way, the human race would be wiped out in a few years.

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 12:57pm:


Everything about your post, as usual, is wrong.

Capital punishment doesn't deter others from committing crimes.

Plus, it costs more than life imprisonment.

And, it's not about the crime: it's about the punishment.

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 1:10pm:


That would result in hundreds of innocent people being executed.

It takes about 11 years, on average, for innocent people on death row to be released.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 1:14pm:
With dna evidence they rarely get cases wrong these days.

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 1:18pm:


1. We are a secular country.

2. If the executioner kills, he must be killed too. An eye for an eye, you said.

3. An eye for an eye means that you would have to rape a rapist. Are you volunteering for the job?

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 1:25pm:


You will kill innocent people.

Then, you would have to be killed.

An eye for an eye.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 1:28pm:
You'd rather keep people alive who in many circumstances have killed multiple people. You are what's wrong with the world pecca. No guts. No spine. Weak and a victim.

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 1:30pm:


No.

You are what's wrong with the world.

You see violence, torture, and murder as legitimate solutions to certain problems.

That's a barbaric, cowardly approach that degrades all of humanity.

I'm everything that's good about the world.

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 2:11pm:


That's your dilemma. I'll leave you to answer it.

I maintain that civilised people do not condone killing as an act of revenge or punishment.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:
monsters don't deserve mercy.

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 2:22pm:


Once again, you miss the point.

Nobody is talking about mercy.

I view the death penalty the same was as I view Bali - it may have its good points - but I have zero interest in going there...

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 2:55pm:
I bet you would if somebody killed your family.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 2:47pm:


The bulk of the arguments against are sanctity of life or about the barbarity.  I believe barbaric humans deserve a barbaric death. 

And regarding it not  being a 100% effective deterrent well no punishment is but to some % it would be a deterrent.  It's certainty an effective punishment.

My only reason to object it is because I have such  little faith in our legal system.

You only need to look at the analytical skills of the bloke on here who reckons he's a lawyer.  If my defence in a murder charge came down to providing evidence that I took a photo from a hill and not a hover car, I'd be screwed. 

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 16^th, 2016 at 12:38pm:


And where did that civilization come from? The answer is: Britain.

Gordon wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 3:09pm:


Yet there's very little (if any) evidence to support your claim.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:



You keep repeating that as much as you beat your rod.

Gordon wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 3:52pm:


This is your quote:

"I believe barbaric humans deserve a barbaric death."

That makes you barbaric.

Somebody needs to take out the garbage.

People who violate the social contract by committing deliberate heinous crimes should be put outside the protection of the social contract, they should be outlawed.

The state should remove its protection from them.

Frank wrote on Oct 19^th, 2016 at 10:08am:


That's one view.

An uncivilised, barbaric view.

Gordon wrote on Oct 19^th, 2016 at 10:15am:


I'm not okay with the barbaric practice involving the premeditated, stat-sanctioned killing of prisoners (which is the topic we are discussing).

Pecca sanctions torture but condemns death penalty. any hypocrisy in this?

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 19^th, 2016 at 10:11am:


You are completely unable  to articulate why it might be uncivilised or barbaric, though.

The state doesn't own anyone so it is not obliged to protect everyone, especially those who wilfully break the social contract.  This is why the death penalty can be legal. It is no more uncivilised or barbaric than legalising abortion or euthanasia or the switching off life support. If anything, it is far more logical and internally consistent because it is clear about the mutual obligations of state and citizen. Nobody is coerced to break the social contract by committing a capital crime.
The killing of an unborn baby or a demented person is far more fraught and difficult to defend than the death penalty.

The latter has what the other two do not: conscious agency by the one being put to death.

mothra wrote on Oct 19^th, 2016 at 10:42am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 21^st, 2016 at 7:19pm:

So why not outlaw them??

Outlaw those who deliberately and murderously offend against others, for example.  Those who put themselves outside the law by deliberately transgressing it.


Who did you think (if that's not too strong a word in your case).