Marla wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 8:11am:

There's a lot of first time crimes people commit without any prior history. So that "clean as a whistle' history of a person/s should not rule out anything, because otherwise, people can use that as their defense on any crime.
The whole story seems riddled with oddities, and tonight, we are given more clues to the whole riddle. It's going to be twister than a bucket of slimed eels.
I had initially thought the 10 yr old did something, but apparently, the little girl had been sexually assaulted?

Why did the oarents lie about their son still being in bed asleep when the operator heard them all talking to him, obviously up and about. Why would they lie about that? Was it a big deal? If there was nothing to hide, you would not think of lying about such a trivial thing if a young kid is awake or not, what was the problem or reason to lie about that?....so straight out lying, means something to hide already. It sounds like defence mode.
If someone takes your child, you don't act with defiance and unwillingness to help the experts, you truly want to be very helpful and willing to oblige as much as possible! Why did the father disappear for an hour and half whilst the cops etc was there? Why did he move the child's body to the lounge room as that is meddling with evidence, on purpose.

Sophia wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 10:09am:



I'd argue that it depends on what your impression of the experts to be. If you thought the experts were either 1) incompetent or 2) had simply decided you had done it and werent bothered about looking anywhere else, it would be difficult to bring yourself to the conclusion of helping them.

Marla wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 10:17am:



So 1 decent cop.

Marla wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 10:20am:



SO incompetent.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 10:14am:


Now there's a point to ponder, the father, being a very wealthy successful business man, would not be dumb, he may already know this? even though no crime had ever been committed in that family before?

So how does one know of the "incompetency of experts" when they have never been through the experience of a crime before?

Such contempt for the police, is mystifying, and their refusal to be interviewed....individually.....they had way too much time, these 2 parents, to have their act more perfectly in place, and instead of going to the police, they go to a television station instead.

Of course, image is everything for this family, got to look perfect in every way.

Sophia wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 10:09am:

A history of child abuse would obviously  be relevant in this case but i agree it's  absence is not a smoking gun. That aside, everything else you've  posted is just amateur sleuthing.

Everything about these two reeks of guilt. Shame she never did stand trial for her crime.