President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 19^th, 2016 at 8:45pm:


Yes me!
What did you think of tonight so far?
I am so impressed and respect those forensic, sound, linguistic etc experts.
And the way they have recreated the Ramsey house? Wow.

This is about expertise, opening up a cold case, 20 years later.
And the blow to that little girls' head, the torch, how they reconstruct a 6 yr old head with hair, and ask a 10 year old to come in and do the demo of the torch being hit over the head.

The body language of the parents during a tv interview were a giveaway also.

I watched Dr. Phil do an interview of their son recently, (he was 10 yrs old at the time it happened) and he was smiling all throughout it, to which Dr. Phil thinks he is very socially awkward.

Well, tomorrow night shows us much more minute and expertise details, but I think I know already who did it.

And I see a photo of the parents, with their 10 year old son, hanging onto him with dear life.

I suppose that means, the son would have been declared mentally unstable or not fit to be in amongst people, had they been more truthful about what really happened.

A secret they are keeping to protect him coz he isn't the full quid? Then trying to fake the kidnapping?

Geez, the practice pads and pens with the same note paper in the house, all placed neatly back in place, the kidnapper supposedly wrote?i

was JonBenet's funeral open-casket? that would have given the mother a final chance to doll her up

Sophia wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 12:10am:


I find it great so far..

so many blunders though.. it makes you angry..

it was like testimony and other forensic people were kept out of it..

why???
whats going on here?

as for the pad and paper all neatly back in place etc... sounds like a person who doesn't like a "hair" out of place... ??

I can't pick how or why this poor little girl got murdered... but one things for sure.. they were all up to their neck in it... 

Marla, you are willing to say that about a suspect who has not confessed, has not been witnessed committing ANY part of the crime and without there being conclusive forensic evidence  connecting her with the crime. Patsy also didn't have any history of violence to her children or even a motive for that matter. Have you studied law to any extent?

The fact is, history is the best guide for an understanding of people's behavuour. Apart from your obvious dislike  of Patsy Ramsey and child beauty pageants in general, what is your basis for declaring her guilty?

Sophia wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 12:10am:



I didnt think that was smiling to be honest he looked as nervous as hell and when you think of how many people refused to talk to this show.. then you need to forgive this young man for daring to be ill at ease...he must have had a hell of a time this past 20 years...

we have so much more technology today  of course they will see and hear stuff... it was a cockup simply because they said it was a" kidnapping"..

I found the letter the biggest mystery....and I had forgotten they found mistakes surly the police would have dismissed it as their handwriting...... it would have to be the longest ransom demand note in history.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 20^th, 2016 at 9:51am:



You tell me.



Any mother who dresses up a six year-old kid like this is not attracting pedophiles?