PZ547
|
For those proudly soft-cock
here's a parable to warm your halfwitted hearts
Grandfather, narcissistic paedophile, wife & kid beater, con-man
His sons and daughter -- all alcoholics, anti-social behaviours lifelong, con-men, druggies
Their kids -- the grandkids:
out of around ten of them:
one semi-famous musician
one lesbian academic
one reasonably socially adjusted single mother
one 'normal'
one kicked out of the family and ostracized lifelong because at age six she blew the whistle on her paedophile grandfather. Her grandmother, aunts, uncles, siblings, mother, cousins -- all closed ranks on her so she isn't included in this survey
the rest:
five males who stole, set fires, lied their faces off at every opportunity, all ended up as drunks and drug addicts, all have police records, all are failures in life
They began their trail of wreckage at early age, all of them
They set bush-fires, then called the firebrigade, then made little heroes of themselves by helping 'save the poor animals'
They broke and entered their own fathers' businesses and/or enrolled associates in same
They chucked bessa blocks through their fathers' business windows at night
They stole from their fathers' businesses and anyone else in range
They broke into and ransacked other people's homes, people they'd never met or done them any harm. They smashed everything in those homes right down to kitchen fixtures. Smashed family photos and heirlooms -- obvious prized possessions of their victims. They pood on carpets and beds. When the houses were write-offs, they moved into the garages and smashed/defaced victim's vehicles. They chose homes near their own, empty homes at the time with the victims out for dinner or on holiday for a few days, etc.
They bleated and whined when they were caught, blamed everyone else
Their fathers paid literal fortunes in restitution and in keeping the news out of the local papers, engaging barristers in some instances
The brats went on to do all the above repeatedly
When the brats married or entered de-facto relationships, they continued to cause misery, beat their wives and kids or deserted them
The law was amazingly tolerant, time and again. For example the chief arsonist was spared kiddie jail more than once. The judge thought it would be character-building for him to serve his time as everyone's little buddy at the local fire-station. In other words, he was basically rewarded and learned how to set fires more effectively and with less chance of being caught. He's now a member of the SES and several other do-gooder associations. He loves wearing uniforms, being around men in uniforms
That family should have been prevented from breeding
Their genes are shite
None of them suffered material hardship. Most were indulged. They were not subjected to cruel treatment. Spare the rod, spare the rod. The family was authoritarian and anti-authoritarian. They were all bullies
Yes, they were 'born bad'. As the family extended outward, it was clear they had mental problems which would place burdens on society. Bad seeds - a problematic gene-pool which has caused untold pain and misery to society
They live a long time. The paedophile grandfather and his enabler wife lived into their 90s, always presenting (for those who didn't know them intimately) a respectable exterior
The grandparents own extended family lived well into their 90s
They got away with it They are glib, fabricators, persuasive. Con men. A family of con-men breeding more con-men Social workers are no match, nor 'the law' Those people laugh at the law Their motto is, 'I make the law'. And although they're of average intelligence only, they've proved they make an ass of the law time and again
Would stern discipline have been able to turn that bunch around while they were still young and plastic enough to be trained into some semblance of social-responsibility? Maybe
But those who claim 'people aren't born bad' are either unintelligent, or unobservant, inexperienced, clueless, willfully blind
And there are far more gene-pools such as the one detailed above than the soft-cocks are prepared to acknowledge
... until they become victim to them
It's not a Pollyanna world. That's for story books. The kid-gloves approach appeals in theory, but often fails in practice
The price paid by society because of soft-cock theories is inestimable
Soft cocks usually hole up with their fantasy world in places well-staffed by police. They get around in daylight when risk is minimal. They ensure they have little exposure to the real world, all the better to cling to their soft-cock philosophies
You do not find soft-cocks at the pointy end. Those at the pointy end know from experience, trial and error, what works and what does not. The soft cocks should be forced to survive at the pointy end. They would soon change their tune. In the meantime, the soft-cocks contribute to and exacerbate the problems they know bugger all about
Some kids should be put-down. Little bastards often grow up to become big bastards
|