Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Is John Smiths laughing at sexual slavery normal?

yes    
  3 (27.3%)
no    
  8 (72.7%)




Total votes: 11
« Created by: rhino on: Aug 12th, 2016 at 7:45pm »

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 
Send Topic Print
Sex slaves ok? (Read 18137 times)
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #360 - Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:23pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:09pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:56pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:52pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:07pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:55pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:18pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:46pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 6:17pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:44am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:58am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:37am:
The west created ISIS and Al quada Alevine.... it's our meddling in the ME that has caused this problem. Let them kill each other if thats what they want to do.

No john, the west did not create islamic terrorism. Islamism creates islamic terrorism.  And the problem is they arent killing eachother, but innocent people, both muslim and non muslim.


I didn't say they created Islamic terrorism. If the west didn't get involved in the M.E., Isis would not exist. It's that simple.

Yeh, largely because the Baathists would be terrorising iraqis just the normal, dictatorial, way.  But who cares right, it's only Iraqis.


I’m wondering, Alevine. How do you feel about that normal dictator Bashir al Assad? He keeps killing Syrians.

Thoughts?


Karnal? Is your old age impacting your memory? I want troops on ground and the removal of Assad.  Remember?


And yet, you avoid all talk of alternatives - on the ground.

Who do you want to replace Assad - Putin? Uncle? Attaturk? ISIS?

Please think about your answer before you explain.

And please explain.

What alternative to troops is there, karnal?
An interim government, with proper support of peacekeeping and also resources (money) to then transition to a government selected by the Syrians.  And each time a regressive leftist cries about some "legality" of the interim gocernment, as they did in Iraq, we give the regressive some cardboard and crayons and tell them to go back to doing what their good at.  Just colour within the lines, karnal!


Oh, I see. You mean like Iraq.

You left out almost a decade of military occupation, but we’re all friends here, no?


Yes, and how long did it take west/east Germany?  The point is you need resources and you need to have commitment. The idiot left you belong to refused to accept that and the result is the troops were pulled out too early and Iraq is now a bastard case
You must have thought vigils and big candles would solve everything?


Oh yes, I forgot East Germany. We showed them, eh?

According to FD, Iraq is the next South Korea, but that’s just he.

It is a jolly, Cold War world, no?


Well it won't be South Korea unfortunately because your lot either wants to see everyone die and do nothing about it, or draw hearts on cardboard boxes and hope that solves everything.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47471
At my desk.
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #361 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 7:59pm
 
Quote:
only if it's something i think is irrelevant


Ah. So the west has been doing the exact same thing in the middle east for 100 years, and you support this claim by insisting that the fact they are doing something completely different is irrelevant, as well as lying about whether they were trying to establish democracy in the first half of last century - but only because it was convenient to lie?

Quote:
Seriously? that's the level your stooping to these days?


You claimed we have been doing the exact same thing for 100 years. The fact that we are trying to establish democracy is relevant.  You can only maintain your position with the idiotic argument that the only two options are interfering and not interfering, the only two outcomes are working and not working. Seriously John, do you still not realise how stupid your position is?
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #362 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:16pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:09pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:56pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:52pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:07pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:55pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:18pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:46pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 6:17pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:44am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:58am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:37am:
The west created ISIS and Al quada Alevine.... it's our meddling in the ME that has caused this problem. Let them kill each other if thats what they want to do.

No john, the west did not create islamic terrorism. Islamism creates islamic terrorism.  And the problem is they arent killing eachother, but innocent people, both muslim and non muslim.


I didn't say they created Islamic terrorism. If the west didn't get involved in the M.E., Isis would not exist. It's that simple.

Yeh, largely because the Baathists would be terrorising iraqis just the normal, dictatorial, way.  But who cares right, it's only Iraqis.


I’m wondering, Alevine. How do you feel about that normal dictator Bashir al Assad? He keeps killing Syrians.

Thoughts?


Karnal? Is your old age impacting your memory? I want troops on ground and the removal of Assad.  Remember?


And yet, you avoid all talk of alternatives - on the ground.

Who do you want to replace Assad - Putin? Uncle? Attaturk? ISIS?

Please think about your answer before you explain.

And please explain.

What alternative to troops is there, karnal?
An interim government, with proper support of peacekeeping and also resources (money) to then transition to a government selected by the Syrians.  And each time a regressive leftist cries about some "legality" of the interim gocernment, as they did in Iraq, we give the regressive some cardboard and crayons and tell them to go back to doing what their good at.  Just colour within the lines, karnal!


Oh, I see. You mean like Iraq.

You left out almost a decade of military occupation, but we’re all friends here, no?


Yes, and how long did it take west/east Germany?  The point is you need resources and you need to have commitment. The idiot left you belong to refused to accept that and the result is the troops were pulled out too early and Iraq is now a bastard case
You must have thought vigils and big candles would solve everything?


Oh yes, I forgot East Germany. We showed them, eh?

According to FD, Iraq is the next South Korea, but that’s just he.

It is a jolly, Cold War world, no?


Well it won't be South Korea unfortunately because your lot either wants to see everyone die and do nothing about it, or draw hearts on cardboard boxes and hope that solves everything.


Sorry, Alevine, I’m confused. Are you saying South Korea should rule Syria?

Is that what people mean by outsourcing?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #363 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:20pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 7:59pm:
Quote:
only if it's something i think is irrelevant


Ah. So the west has been doing the exact same thing in the middle east for 100 years, and you support this claim by insisting that the fact they are doing something completely different is irrelevant, as well as lying about whether they were trying to establish democracy in the first half of last century - but only because it was convenient to lie?

Quote:
Seriously? that's the level your stooping to these days?


You claimed we have been doing the exact same thing for 100 years. The fact that we are trying to establish democracy is relevant. 


Sorry, FD, we’re going to have to go back over the last 9 years of social intercourse.

How are we trying to establish democracy again?

I’ve forgotten.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #364 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:20pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:16pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:09pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:56pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:52pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 9:07pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:55pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:18pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 7:46pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 6:17pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 10:44am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:58am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2016 at 8:37am:
The west created ISIS and Al quada Alevine.... it's our meddling in the ME that has caused this problem. Let them kill each other if thats what they want to do.

No john, the west did not create islamic terrorism. Islamism creates islamic terrorism.  And the problem is they arent killing eachother, but innocent people, both muslim and non muslim.


I didn't say they created Islamic terrorism. If the west didn't get involved in the M.E., Isis would not exist. It's that simple.

Yeh, largely because the Baathists would be terrorising iraqis just the normal, dictatorial, way.  But who cares right, it's only Iraqis.


I’m wondering, Alevine. How do you feel about that normal dictator Bashir al Assad? He keeps killing Syrians.

Thoughts?


Karnal? Is your old age impacting your memory? I want troops on ground and the removal of Assad.  Remember?


And yet, you avoid all talk of alternatives - on the ground.

Who do you want to replace Assad - Putin? Uncle? Attaturk? ISIS?

Please think about your answer before you explain.

And please explain.

What alternative to troops is there, karnal?
An interim government, with proper support of peacekeeping and also resources (money) to then transition to a government selected by the Syrians.  And each time a regressive leftist cries about some "legality" of the interim gocernment, as they did in Iraq, we give the regressive some cardboard and crayons and tell them to go back to doing what their good at.  Just colour within the lines, karnal!


Oh, I see. You mean like Iraq.

You left out almost a decade of military occupation, but we’re all friends here, no?


Yes, and how long did it take west/east Germany?  The point is you need resources and you need to have commitment. The idiot left you belong to refused to accept that and the result is the troops were pulled out too early and Iraq is now a bastard case
You must have thought vigils and big candles would solve everything?


Oh yes, I forgot East Germany. We showed them, eh?

According to FD, Iraq is the next South Korea, but that’s just he.

It is a jolly, Cold War world, no?


Well it won't be South Korea unfortunately because your lot either wants to see everyone die and do nothing about it, or draw hearts on cardboard boxes and hope that solves everything.


Sorry, Alevine, I’m confused. Are you saying South Korea should rule Syria?

Is that what people mean by outsourcing?

Karnal, no need to tel us you're confused, that part is obvious Wink

Just read it out loud and slowly. It'll come to you, dear.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #365 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:26pm
 
Not saying, eh?

No worries. Bavaria beer will do that to you.

Google: taqiyya.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #366 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:27pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
Not saying, eh?

No worries. Bavaria beer will do that to you.

Google: taqiyya.


Google: how the left screwed Iraq Wink
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #367 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:34pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
Not saying, eh?

No worries. Bavaria beer will do that to you.

Google: taqiyya.


Google: how the left screwed Iraq Wink


"The left?"

Oh, you mean regressives. Sorry, "progressives".

Well, alright, the left will do. I was never any good with all these categories.

Neither were you before the accident.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #368 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:39pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:34pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
Not saying, eh?

No worries. Bavaria beer will do that to you.

Google: taqiyya.


Google: how the left screwed Iraq Wink


"The left?"

Oh, you mean regressives. Sorry, "progressives".

Well, alright, the left will do. I was never any good with all these categories.

Neither were you before the accident.


Karnal, are people not allowed to change their views? Is this another of your Islamic principles?  I already explained that I was fundamentally wrong in my opinion. I was misguided. So what? 

Yes, regressives is the correct term for your lot.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #369 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:43pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:34pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
Not saying, eh?

No worries. Bavaria beer will do that to you.

Google: taqiyya.


Google: how the left screwed Iraq Wink


"The left?"

Oh, you mean regressives. Sorry, "progressives".

Well, alright, the left will do. I was never any good with all these categories.

Neither were you before the accident.


Karnal, are people not allowed to change their views? Is this another of your Islamic principles?  I already explained that I was fundamentally wrong in my opinion. I was misguided.


About the left?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #370 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:50pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:43pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:34pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
Not saying, eh?

No worries. Bavaria beer will do that to you.

Google: taqiyya.


Google: how the left screwed Iraq Wink


"The left?"

Oh, you mean regressives. Sorry, "progressives".

Well, alright, the left will do. I was never any good with all these categories.

Neither were you before the accident.


Karnal, are people not allowed to change their views? Is this another of your Islamic principles?  I already explained that I was fundamentally wrong in my opinion. I was misguided.


About the left?


About my views on Islam and about the Iraq war.  About political correctness.  For instance, watching qanda on Monday i cringed at corine for the stupid sh1t she was trying to say.  Perhaps my old views would've aligned with her dumb point of view, but now I recognise how foolish it is. I believe you lot are destroying my left, and it's very sad to see.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #371 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:53pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:50pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:43pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:34pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
Not saying, eh?

No worries. Bavaria beer will do that to you.

Google: taqiyya.


Google: how the left screwed Iraq Wink


"The left?"

Oh, you mean regressives. Sorry, "progressives".

Well, alright, the left will do. I was never any good with all these categories.

Neither were you before the accident.


Karnal, are people not allowed to change their views? Is this another of your Islamic principles?  I already explained that I was fundamentally wrong in my opinion. I was misguided.


About the left?


About my views on Islam and about the Iraq war.  About political correctness.  For instance, watching qanda on Monday i cringed at corine for the stupid sh1t she was trying to say.  Perhaps my old views would've aligned with her dumb point of view, but now I recognise how foolish it is. I believe you lot are destroying my left, and it's very sad to see.


Which left is that, Alevine?

You’ve just said you blame The Left.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Sex slaves ok?
Reply #372 - Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:57pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:53pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:50pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:43pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:34pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 24th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
Not saying, eh?

No worries. Bavaria beer will do that to you.

Google: taqiyya.


Google: how the left screwed Iraq Wink


"The left?"

Oh, you mean regressives. Sorry, "progressives".

Well, alright, the left will do. I was never any good with all these categories.

Neither were you before the accident.


Karnal, are people not allowed to change their views? Is this another of your Islamic principles?  I already explained that I was fundamentally wrong in my opinion. I was misguided.


About the left?


About my views on Islam and about the Iraq war.  About political correctness.  For instance, watching qanda on Monday i cringed at corine for the stupid sh1t she was trying to say.  Perhaps my old views would've aligned with her dumb point of view, but now I recognise how foolish it is. I believe you lot are destroying my left, and it's very sad to see.


Which left is that, Alevine?

You’ve just said you blame The Left.


Your left karnal. The left that refuses to acknowledge the problems in fear that it may "offend" someone. The left that draws love hearts in response to terrorist attacks.  Your left, karnal. Not mine.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 
Send Topic Print