Australian Politics Forum

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: I Think
Reply #15 - Aug 11^th, 2016 at 5:20pm

issuevoter wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 7:37am:

Cods, until recently the USA had been the most powerful business corporation since 1918. Corruption levels are relative to stockpiles of money and power. The baggage you speak of, has accompanied almost every President. The only difference is today we have more scrutiny.

of course.... every human being has a few warts....and I do not think any Pres or PM. was brought up to be the Dalai lama ...

but these two people .. two out of over 320million...

could not be more equal and more alike if they tried...

you would have to count each of their faults....[too many]...to pick.. JUST WHO IS THE WORST.

not the BEST...

if you read the replies everyone is saying..

well shes not as bad as him.. so I will go for her..

or

he isnt anywhere near as bad as her.. so I will go for him..

would you pick a plumber to renovate your bathroom with that record????>..

well hes not good.. but hes better than the other one...OMG...

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: I Think
Reply #16 - Aug 11^th, 2016 at 5:22pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 4:36pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 1:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 12:54pm:

I'm no fan of Hillary, however, she is a far better choice than Trump when it comes to the POTUS candidacy.

What's so bad about Hilary? She is, as they say, the most qualified presidential candidate since ex-vice president, George Bush Snr.

Hilary's got 8 years as "first lady", 10 years as a senator, 3 years as secretary of state.

If the wrongful use of an email server is the worst thing they've got on her, that speaks volumes. For me, the worst thing is her vote for the invasion of Iraq. I hope she's made amends for that one.

The Republicans haven't liked Hilary since she led Clinton's failed attempt to get universal health care. They've maintained their rage through Hilary's choice of fashion.

Yes, leftards, Hilary is guilty of wearing pantsuits.

there is a whole thread showing her corruption and failures.

dont forget Hillary has spent most of her adult life in the public arena.......

where as Trump has had 4 bankruptcies....and no one seemed to know about them until he was well into the running so he has almost a secret life...

not that that as a big deal..

my concern is.. this is the BEST America has got..

I find it a worry..

Back to top

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Online

OzPolitic

Posts: 39511
Gender: male

Re: I Think
Reply #17 - Aug 11^th, 2016 at 5:23pm

Mattyfisk wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 4:40pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 4:36pm:

there is a whole thread showing her corruption and failures.

But it doesn't describe any actual corruption and failures.

Lucky there's the pantsuits, eh?

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then...

there are many scandals and corruptions there.

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Online

OzPolitic

Posts: 39511
Gender: male

Re: I Think
Reply #18 - Aug 11^th, 2016 at 5:27pm

karnal

Quote:

.........“A few weeks after Hillary Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, she was summoned to Geneva by her Swiss counterpart to discuss an urgent matter. The Internal Revenue Service was suing UBS AG to get the identities of Americans with secret accounts,” the newspaper reports. “If the case proceeded, Switzerland’s largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court. Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlement—an unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.”

Then reporters James V. Grimaldi and Rebecca Ballhaus lay out how UBS helped the Clintons. “Total donations by UBS to the Clinton Foundation grew from less than $60,000 through 2008 to a cumulative total of about $600,000 by the end of 2014, according to the foundation and the bank,” they report. “The bank also joined the Clinton Foundation to launch entrepreneurship and inner-city loan programs, through which it lent $32 million. And it paid former president Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House.”........

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then...

the 'clinton foundation' has achieved nothing.

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92279
Gender: male

Re: I Think
Reply #19 - Aug 11^th, 2016 at 9:26pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 5:27pm:

karnal

Quote:

.........“A few weeks after Hillary Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, she was summoned to Geneva by her Swiss counterpart to discuss an urgent matter. The Internal Revenue Service was suing UBS AG to get the identities of Americans with secret accounts,” the newspaper reports. “If the case proceeded, Switzerland’s largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court. Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlement—an unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.”

Then reporters James V. Grimaldi and Rebecca Ballhaus lay out how UBS helped the Clintons. “Total donations by UBS to the Clinton Foundation grew from less than $60,000 through 2008 to a cumulative total of about $600,000 by the end of 2014, according to the foundation and the bank,” they report. “The bank also joined the Clinton Foundation to launch entrepreneurship and inner-city loan programs, through which it lent $32 million. And it paid former president Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House.”........

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then...

the 'clinton foundation' has achieved nothing.

That’s a relief. We’ll need a bit more than the pantsuits for an impeachment.

Back to top

IP Logged