Thru gritted teeth Leigh supports his beloved failed "Leader" who has just created the biggest stuff up of his "career" as he has thrown the pathetic ALP into turmoil and mayhem for the next 3 years and the next 3 years and....Have a go at some COMMENTS:-Hazzmat Jul 25 2016 at 10:28amBill Shorten. Still protecting workers' rights.
Piped Piper Jul 25 2016 at 10:51amLeigh is one of the few talented non union affiliated MPs in the Labor party. No surprise to see him to get stiffed. They're lucky to have him.
Really Jul 25 2016 at 10:51amSounds like Shorten used the same negotiation strategy as he did with the Coles and the mushroom workers.
enough is enough Jul 25 2016 at 10:54amLooks like not joining a Union faction cost him $40,000. What a complete mess this ALP shadow ministry has become. The backstabbing and vendettas will be on for young and old.
George Jul 25 2016 at 10:57amQuotas and factionalism are the achillies of Labor. Ability does not come into play. Dr Leigh takes a pay cut for the filthy factions. Oh yes they have Australians as their number one concerns. And those Australians can be counted by looking at the shadow ministry. And by the way they are all from the "Big End of Town" when comes to income. Selfish hypocrites,the lot of them.
Labor frontbencher Andrew Leigh says he's 'doing just fine' after $40,000 pay cutFergus Hunter July 25 2016 - 9:44AM
Click to see video on Leigh thru gritted teeth clinging onto his position in the shattered ALP
http://www.smh.com.au/video/video-news/video-national-news/andrew-leigh-pay-cut-...Labor's Andrew Leigh has sought to put positive spin on his $40,000 pay cut that resulted from factional manoeuvring in Bill Shorten's revamped shadow ministry.
Dr Leigh, who sits independently without a faction in the Labor caucus, was given increased responsibilities in the reshuffle on the weekend.
Bill Shorten gives the shadow assistant treasurer more responsibility but cuts his pay, to save Kim Carr. Courtesy ABC RN, Sky News.
As well as continuing as shadow assistant treasurer and opposition spokesman for competition, he picks up responsibility for charities and productivity.
But together with senator Sam Dastyari, the pair were victims of an arrangement that saw the shadow ministry expanded to keep Left faction heavyweight Kim Carr on the frontbench.
Mr Shorten, a long-term ally, retained him and expanded the shadow ministry to 32, but legislation only provides for 30 shadow ministry level salaries.
Dr Leigh says he feels extraordinary lucky to continue as a frontbencher and serve in the Parliament, dismissing the significance of the $40,000 pay cut.
"Frankly, the last thing we need to be worrying about in Australia right now is whether someone slipped from the top 1 per cent of income distribution to the top 2 per cent," Dr Leigh told ABC radio on Monday.
"There's families in Australia today that are struggling to afford to buy Christmas presents for their kids, struggling to afford to be able to get to the doctor, there's people that slept homeless last night.
Labor MP Andrew Leigh is taking a pay cut under the extended 32-member shadow ministry. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen
"Let's not worry about people in the top couple of per cent of the income distribution – we're doing just fine."
Senator Carr was dumped by his own faction, who didn't put the veteran up for a frontbench position, so he broke off with three colleagues and demanded a spot.
Dr Leigh, who defended the idea of being an independent in the highly factional party, will now be paid $199,040 instead of the $238,848 for other junior frontbenchers.
"I feel extraordinarily fortunate to have the opportunity to be in Federal Parliament and more so still to be on Bill Shorten's frontbench. So I have no sense of disappointment about this," he said.
On the government's proposed high-end superannuation crackdown, Dr Leigh said Labor would support sensible measures but wanted an inquiry into whether the $500,000 lifetime cap on non-concessional contributions was retrospective or not.
"My view is that we do need an independent enquiry. Because there's been a a range of credible people who have said that these measures are retrospective. The government claims they're not but many of their own party room disagree," he said.
"We're inclined to support sensible measures that rein in the excesses in superannuation tax breaks. Labor began this debate last year when we put our proposals on the table and we've been constructive in working with the government."
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/labor-frontbencher-andrew-...