freediver
Gold Member
Offline
www.ozpolitic.com
Posts: 47369
At my desk.
|
Gandalf did however offer an excuse for AFIC's behaviour - apparently they are a "for profit" organisation. Unfortunately since then he has also repeatedly denied saying this, then pretended to misunderstand the question when asked for clarification. freediver wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 8:37pm: polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 8:30pm: freediver wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 8:13pm: polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 7:25pm: freediver wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 6:00pm: Muslims like Gandalf who insist it is expected for them to behave unethically because they are for-profit organisations, and that Muslims should not be asking them what they spend the money on. Even after all these years, the sheer audacity of FD to just make crap after crap up - can still take my breath away. Which bit am I making up Gandalf? everything in that quote. Here is the most recent example of you trying to pretend you never argued they are a for-profit organisation: freediver wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 10:03am: polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 9:48am: freediver wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 7:17am: You said that AFIC itself was a for-profit organisation I don't think so. That's funny. You thought so before. Have you changed your mind, or merely decided it is no longer relevant? polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 29 th, 2016 at 1:11pm: freediver wrote on Jun 28 th, 2016 at 5:43pm: They paid these fees to the AFIC. What did the AFIC do with them? What does any for-profit organisation do with their profits? You also tried to deny saying this in the other thread. I have had to quote it for you several times already. Quote:The only relevant issue here is that they were deemed to be operating 'for-profit' in relation to their management of Malek Fahd's school funds. Thats not from me, thats from the government, so take it up with them if you have a problem with that description. Tell me Gandalf, what is more relevant to the discussion of halal funding - what AFIC does with it's "profits", or what a school did with theirs? Perhaps you like to shift the goalposts now? Curiously, Gandalf has started objecting to my suggestion that he quote me directly, even when I copy and paste some specific quotes of mine that he can use to show me saying what he keeps demanding I say: freediver wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 7:24am: Oh good. I'm glad we caught this one before moving on to the next one. Quote:It was not unequivocal FD, you cryptically said "I stand by what I said... feel free to quote me" polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 9 th, 2016 at 10:28am: freediver wrote on Jul 9 th, 2016 at 8:01am: Gandalf, did I state it as fact and clearly stand by that statement? You stated it as fact, but you certainly haven't clearly stood by the statement. Not even now. Amazing, I give you the clearest of opportunities to state unequivocally what you actually "stand by", and you can't even do that. freediver wrote on Jul 1 st, 2016 at 8:59pm: I absolutely stand by my original statement regarding the factuality of said claim. Feel free to quote me. freediver wrote on Jul 6 th, 2016 at 12:56pm: I posted on the previous page that I absolutely stand by it. When I state something as fact, I mean what I say and I stand by it, so feel free to quote me. I don't use hyperbole lightly Gandalf. Happy now Gandalf? polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 3:05pm: freediver wrote on Jul 10 th, 2016 at 1:50pm: If you are so keen to move on, why not simply concede this one? Are you saving it to come back to again? You seem a bit touchy about this FD. I simply don't understand what the qualifier "feel free to quote me" means.
|