greggerypeccary
|
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 6:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 6:09pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 6:07pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 5:38pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 4:38pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 3:26pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 3:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 3:17pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 3:03pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 3:02pm: Fuzzball wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 2:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7 th, 2016 at 2:36pm: Anybody could have typed that. A legal template as shown is available in MS Word, so typing that dross and copying to file or scanning it would produce that amateur little attachment. You really are going out of your way to defend an alleged child rapist, aren't you? Well, take a look at this: "COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION" https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-a...You're making excuses for someone accused of gang raping a child. All the years this person could have went to the police ... Yes, that always concerns me too. However, do you remember these cases: Rolf Harris; That guy from Hey Dad; Jimmy Savile; Bill Cosby; ? The guy from Hey Dad had witnesses. Rolf harris had multiple allegations and witnesses. I pretty sure Saville never got charged and Cosby hasn't been charged. Trump hasn't been charged either. And, the woman making the allegations against Trump has a witness. It seems like you're prepared to bend over backwards in an effort to defend these allegations of child rape against Trump. Why is that? Because it's fishy. Until Trump is arrested it looks like you have taken a biased exception to him. How is it "fishy"? timing I agree the timing is an issue, but it doesn't necessarily mean he's innocent. I have no idea if he did it or not, and I'm not saying one way or the other. However, it can't be assumed that he's innocent purely on the basis of timing. Wouldn't you agree? Why are you banging on about defending child rapists etc. You've changed your tune all of a sudden Pecca. Innocent until proven guilty hey. I haven't changed anything, Homo. I've never once said that he's guilty. Now, do you agree with what I said in that previous post? i.e. it can't be assumed that he's innocent purely on the basis of timing. Agreed?
|