Australian Politics Forum - Is this the Q in LGBTQ?

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #15 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15929
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #16 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:30pm

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:28pm:

Setanta wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:21pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:10pm:

Black Orchid wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 3:56pm:

People demanding the right to marry their 'dog' may become a reality.

Of course they won't.

Dogs can't give consent.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2741901/The-husband-s-real-hound-Girl-18...

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/593232/Woman-marrying-dog-husband-cat-d...

http://www.marryyourpet.com/

I doubt very much that they would be legally binding institutions.

No, they aren't. Neither are gay marriages.

Back to top

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #17 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #18 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm

Setanta wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:30pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:28pm:

Setanta wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:21pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:10pm:

Black Orchid wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 3:56pm:

People demanding the right to marry their 'dog' may become a reality.

Of course they won't.

Dogs can't give consent.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2741901/The-husband-s-real-hound-Girl-18...

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/593232/Woman-marrying-dog-husband-cat-d...

http://www.marryyourpet.com/

I doubt very much that they would be legally binding institutions.

No, they aren't. Neither are gay marriages.

Not yet.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15929
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #19 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:32pm

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

Perhaps an X or fingerprint will do for the illiterate beasts?

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #20 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:32pm

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue

No. Marriage requires consent.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #21 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:32pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue

No. Marriage requires consent.

And sex doesn't........????

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #22 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:32pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue

No. Marriage requires consent.

And sex doesn't........????

No. That's what we call rape.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #23 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:35pm

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:32pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue

No. Marriage requires consent.

And sex doesn't........????

No. That's what we call rape.

So then what Peter Singer is really talking about is raping the poor animal.....!!!!

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #24 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:38pm

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:35pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:32pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue

No. Marriage requires consent.

And sex doesn't........????

No. That's what we call rape.

So then what Peter Singer is really talking about is raping the poor animal.....!!!!

Depends is suppose. A man sodomising a sheep is definitely rape but a woman fellating a dog is probably going to make the dog very happy.

As repulsive as the concept is to me.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #25 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:42pm

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:38pm:

Depends is suppose. A man sodomising a sheep is definitely rape but a woman fellating a dog is probably going to make the dog very happy.

As repulsive as the concept is to me.

Well I'm not an expert on bestiality and I don't which of those Peter Singer is referring to, but in any case the animal has not given its consent whether it has a happy ending or not.

Therefore its really rape.

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15929
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #26 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:43pm

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:38pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:35pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:32pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue

No. Marriage requires consent.

And sex doesn't........????

No. That's what we call rape.

So then what Peter Singer is really talking about is raping the poor animal.....!!!!

Depends is suppose. A man sodomising a sheep is definitely rape but a woman fellating a dog is probably going to make the dog very happy.

As repulsive as the concept is to me.

What about a man being arse torn by a stallion like that guy that died a decade or so ago? The stallion is obviously giving consent in hammering his sphincter.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #27 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:47pm

Setanta wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:43pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:38pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:35pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:33pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:32pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:31pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:29pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:22pm:

Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.

Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???

Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.

I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue

No. Marriage requires consent.

And sex doesn't........????

No. That's what we call rape.

So then what Peter Singer is really talking about is raping the poor animal.....!!!!

Depends is suppose. A man sodomising a sheep is definitely rape but a woman fellating a dog is probably going to make the dog very happy.

As repulsive as the concept is to me.

What about a man being arse torn by a stallion like that guy that died a decade or so ago? The stallion is obviously giving consent in hammering his sphincter.

That'd come under the category of Darwin Award material.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #28 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:48pm

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:42pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:38pm:

Depends is suppose. A man sodomising a sheep is definitely rape but a woman fellating a dog is probably going to make the dog very happy.

As repulsive as the concept is to me.

Well I'm not an expert on bestiality and I don't which of those Peter Singer is referring to, but in any case the animal has not given its consent whether it has a happy ending or not.

Therefore its really rape.

Do you think it's rape when we masturbate animals for science or artificial insemination?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #29 - May 28^th, 2016 at 11:51pm

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:48pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:42pm:

mothra wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 11:38pm:

Depends is suppose. A man sodomising a sheep is definitely rape but a woman fellating a dog is probably going to make the dog very happy.

As repulsive as the concept is to me.

Well I'm not an expert on bestiality and I don't which of those Peter Singer is referring to, but in any case the animal has not given its consent whether it has a happy ending or not.

Therefore its really rape.

Do you think it's rape when we masturbate animals for science or artificial insemination?

Well imagine if a dog pinned you down and inserted his paw into your vagina.

What would you classify that as.....????

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged