Home Articles Forum Wiki Poll Garden Contact

 
 
 
  
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

  Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Chat › Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print
Is this the Q in LGBTQ? (Read 4763 times)
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #120 - May 29th, 2016 at 2:15am  
some more and on this note goodnight I'm off.
Back to top
 
1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #121 - May 29th, 2016 at 2:15am  
Back to top
 
1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Black Orchid
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5803
Gender: female
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #122 - May 31st, 2016 at 4:52pm  
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:29pm:
Ajax wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:27pm:
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:22pm:
Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage. 


Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???



Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.


Of course, the same is also true of many people.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 31st, 2016 at 4:58pm by Black Orchid »  
 
IP Logged
 
Black Orchid
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5803
Gender: female
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #123 - May 31st, 2016 at 4:57pm  
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:32pm:
Ajax wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:31pm:
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:29pm:
Ajax wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:27pm:
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:22pm:
Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage. 


Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???



Because an animal can get obviously horny but it can't sign it's name.


I think you could teach a dog to dip its paw in an ink pad and then stamp a piece of paper....... Tongue



No. Marriage requires consent.



Tell that to the scores of prepubescent young girls who are married in the name of Allah.  Even here in Australia.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
 

  « Forum ‹ Board Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge