Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print
Is this the Q in LGBTQ? (Read 4762 times)
Black Orchid
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5802
Gender: female
Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
May 28th, 2016 at 3:51pm
 
Quote:
Insanity. It's not just a mental illness. It's also an identity. Men in dresses claim that gender is in the mind, not in the body. If you think you're a woman, then you are a woman. What used to be a minor form of eccentric insanity has now become educational policy in schools.

But why stop at gender when you can also do species? There are people who believe that their true identity is that of an animal. And who is to say that species isn't in the mind, just like gender is in the mind?

This isn't just a thought-experiment or satire. It's reality.

Species dysphoria is the equivalent of Gender dysphoria. Mentally ill persons with gender dysphoria are fashionably diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder. There is as of yet no Species Identity Disorder, but that is no doubt coming.

Like Trannies, Transpecies Americans create special pronouns for themselves and insist that refusing to pretend that they're cats or wolves is a hate crime.

Like most newly minted civil rights groups, Trannies are intolerant of Transpecies Americans accusing them of only pretending to think that they're cats and playing the old, "How dare you compare your pain to my pain and your imaginary identity to my imaginary identity" game.

Men who claim that they were really born women based on their personality insist that the idea of men who claim they were born cats is just nuts.

If you are reading this, you are human. You are of the species Homo sapiens. That is a scientific fact, measured objectively by your genes.

Yes and if your chromosomes are male, then that also is a scientific fact measured objectively.

See the problem is that there's no limit on boundaries once you begin breaking them. Then you can no longer shut the door and say that X is legitimate but Y isn't. Once you begin claiming that identity is a mental construct, then you can't begin insisting on the primacy of genetic identity.

If you accept transgender, then you also have to accept transpecies and every other conceivable thing. If a man who believes he's a woman has a real problem that has to be solved with surgery to make him resemble a woman, then a man who think he's a dolphin must be given whatever surgery he needs to look like a dolphin.

Tolerance has spoken.




...



  Shocked
Back to top
 

1700.jpg (63 KB | )
1700.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
Black Orchid
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5802
Gender: female
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #1 - May 28th, 2016 at 3:56pm
 
People demanding the right to marry their 'dog' may become a reality.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #2 - May 28th, 2016 at 4:25pm
 
"Dog license" would take on a whole new meaning.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
Black Orchid
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5802
Gender: female
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #3 - May 28th, 2016 at 4:43pm
 
Should they be microchipped and registered?   Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #4 - May 28th, 2016 at 4:58pm
 
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:43pm:
Should they be microchipped and registered?   Grin



They should be put down.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #5 - May 28th, 2016 at 6:58pm
 
... wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:58pm:
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:43pm:
Should they be microchipped and registered?   Grin



They should be put down.


x 2
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #6 - May 28th, 2016 at 7:27pm
 
... wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:58pm:
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:43pm:
Should they be microchipped and registered?   Grin



They should be put down.



so little tolerance BO..... I think this may be a lost cause......

sad but true.. we have people out there fair dinkum blind to the fantasy world in our own back yards

heres something to chew on honky... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

[urlhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2534494/Secrets-men-love-dress-rubber-dolls-revealed-new-Channel-4-documentary.html][/url]
...


With her long blonde locks, curvaceous figure and elfin features, 40-something Sherry is a woman few men would turn down. But there’s a catch. Sherry isn’t really a woman at all. Instead, she’s a retired property developer from California named Robert.
Robert is one of a growing number of men for whom time off means time spent dressed in an elaborate body suit, complete with breasts and a vagina, designed to make them look like the glamorous women they are not.
Unlike transgender people, ‘maskers’, or ‘rubber dollers’ as they’re also known, do not feel born in the wrong body. For them, dressing up as a member of the opposite sex is a simply a way to have fun.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #7 - May 28th, 2016 at 8:13pm
 
cods wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 7:27pm:
... wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:58pm:
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:43pm:
Should they be microchipped and registered?   Grin



They should be put down.



so little tolerance BO..... I think this may be a lost cause......

sad but true.. we have people out there fair dinkum blind to the fantasy world in our own back yards

heres something to chew on honky... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

[urlhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2534494/Secrets-men-love-dress-rubber-dolls-revealed-new-Channel-4-documentary.html][/url]
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/01/06/article-2534494-1A72569900000578-83_63...


With her long blonde locks, curvaceous figure and elfin features, 40-something Sherry is a woman few men would turn down. But there’s a catch. Sherry isn’t really a woman at all. Instead, she’s a retired property developer from California named Robert.
Robert is one of a growing number of men for whom time off means time spent dressed in an elaborate body suit, complete with breasts and a vagina, designed to make them look like the glamorous women they are not.
Unlike transgender people, ‘maskers’, or ‘rubber dollers’ as they’re also known, do not feel born in the wrong body. For them, dressing up as a member of the opposite sex is a simply a way to have fun.




Hey cods

Would you want a transgender man in the womens with your little grand daughter......????
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 28th, 2016 at 8:21pm by Ajax »  

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39522
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #8 - May 28th, 2016 at 8:15pm
 
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 6:58pm:
... wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:58pm:
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 4:43pm:
Should they be microchipped and registered?   Grin



They should be put down.


x 2


X 3
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #9 - May 28th, 2016 at 11:10pm
 
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 3:56pm:
People demanding the right to marry their 'dog' may become a reality.




Of course they won't.

Dogs can't give consent.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #10 - May 28th, 2016 at 11:17pm
 
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:10pm:
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 3:56pm:
People demanding the right to marry their 'dog' may become a reality.




Of course they won't.

Dogs can't give consent.


Well according to author Peter Singer and Bob Brown's the Green's Bible this is possible.

Quote:
Peter Singer expands these notions in his other works on animal liberation. He charges that humans are guilty of “speciesism”, that is, preferring their own species over all others. It leads him to argue in favour of infanticide and doctor-assisted suicide on one hand; and bestiality on the other, provided there is mutual consent! [38]

The Greens’ Agenda, in Their Own Words

Read the whole article here

https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2011/01-02/the-greens-agenda-in-their-own-words...

Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15928
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #11 - May 28th, 2016 at 11:21pm
 
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:10pm:
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 3:56pm:
People demanding the right to marry their 'dog' may become a reality.




Of course they won't.

Dogs can't give consent.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2741901/The-husband-s-real-hound-Girl-18...

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/593232/Woman-marrying-dog-husband-cat-d...

http://www.marryyourpet.com/
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #12 - May 28th, 2016 at 11:22pm
 
Ajax wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:17pm:
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:10pm:
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 3:56pm:
People demanding the right to marry their 'dog' may become a reality.




Of course they won't.

Dogs can't give consent.


Well according to author Peter Singer and Bob Brown's the Green's Bible this is possible.

Quote:
Peter Singer expands these notions in his other works on animal liberation. He charges that humans are guilty of “speciesism”, that is, preferring their own species over all others. It leads him to argue in favour of infanticide and doctor-assisted suicide on one hand; and bestiality on the other, provided there is mutual consent! [38]

The Greens’ Agenda, in Their Own Words

Read the whole article here

https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2011/01-02/the-greens-agenda-in-their-own-words...






Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #13 - May 28th, 2016 at 11:27pm
 
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:22pm:
Then Peter Singer is wrong.

But he speaks only of sexual acts between humans and animals, not marriage. 


Well in his mind they can consent to sex, why not marriage....???
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female
Re: Is this the Q in LGBTQ?
Reply #14 - May 28th, 2016 at 11:28pm
 
Setanta wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:21pm:
mothra wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 11:10pm:
Black Orchid wrote on May 28th, 2016 at 3:56pm:
People demanding the right to marry their 'dog' may become a reality.




Of course they won't.

Dogs can't give consent.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2741901/The-husband-s-real-hound-Girl-18...

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/593232/Woman-marrying-dog-husband-cat-d...

http://www.marryyourpet.com/




I doubt very much that they would be legally binding institutions.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print