Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 ... 31
Send Topic Print
a mindless collective of treacherous Jews (Read 87494 times)
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #300 - Jun 20th, 2016 at 10:51am
 
Maybe we can get there by elimination?  I'll go first.

It wasn't me.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92344
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #301 - Jun 20th, 2016 at 10:52am
 
Aussie wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 10:51am:
Maybe we can get there by elimination?  I'll go first.

It wasn't me.


It wasn't me either.

G, was it you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92344
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #302 - Jun 20th, 2016 at 4:08pm
 
What about you, FD?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 20th, 2016 at 4:39pm by Mattyfisk »  
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #303 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:29am
 
Grin stop it K.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47435
At my desk.
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #304 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 7:10pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 6:42pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 6:33pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 3:50pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 12:38pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 11:25am:
FD still can't decide whether the treaty was in fact broken by the Banu Qurayza (leaving out for the moment of who should be deemed guilty of such a crime).

Now that the moment has passed, let's move on to that question. What do you think Gandalf? All 800 of them, because they are all guilty of being part of a mindless collective of treacherous Jews? Tough titties, off with their heads, religion of peace????


Whatever suits your meme FD - you go with that. Clearly facts don't matter.


So now it is my meme? Are you denying making these arguments Gandalf?


Yes x 2

Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Redmond Neck
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 20712
ACT
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #305 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 7:58pm
 
I don't like the tone of this topic freediver sounds a bit racist to me!



Back to top
 

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92344
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #306 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 9:19pm
 
Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 7:58pm:
I don't like the tone of this topic freediver sounds a bit racist to me!





Not at all, Redneck. FD says the Joos are not a race. He’s free to say whatever he thinks about them.

Still, FD ’s only being wacist to get G to confess. His plan is to expose G’s sinister propaganda by creating it himself.

Cunning, no?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 23rd, 2016 at 9:27pm by Mattyfisk »  
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #307 - Jun 24th, 2016 at 12:15pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 9:19pm:
His plan is to expose G’s sinister propaganda by creating it himself.


summed up to a tee.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47435
At my desk.
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #308 - Aug 4th, 2016 at 4:11pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 3rd, 2016 at 6:22pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 3rd, 2016 at 12:05pm:
freediver wrote on Aug 2nd, 2016 at 7:30pm:
Ah, the old "mindless collective" argument. Absurd no? Monumentally stupid even? Always, or only when non-Muslims do it?


When we are talking about over a billion followers from all over the world - yes. Oh wait, were you actually comparing that to my thoughts about the mentality of the members from a tiny tribe in arabia in the 7th century?

But lets stay on topic - do you acknowledge this tendency to lump all muslims into a mindless collective? If so do you agree its a problem?


I acknowledge that you explicitly used the mindless collective justification for slaughtering Jews.

Is there a fundamental difference between 800 Jews and a billion Muslims, that allows you to use the mindless collective justification on the Jews but object to it being used for Muslims, without being a hypocrite?


Gandalf, can you explain how your explicit use of the mindless collective argument to justify the slaughter of Jews differs fundamentally from the mindless collective argument you so eagerly ascribe to others?
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47435
At my desk.
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #309 - Sep 4th, 2017 at 7:03pm
 
bump for Gandalf
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Moriaty
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #310 - Sep 6th, 2017 at 1:29am
 
Gandalf makes some very good points. I just wonder if those points are too advanced for most of the members (hehe) of this forum?  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Defend Free-speech. Say no to censorship on this forum! Defend the freedoms our soldiers fought for against the Fascist-racist forces of evil!
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92344
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #311 - Sep 6th, 2017 at 1:49am
 
Moriaty wrote on Sep 6th, 2017 at 1:29am:
Gandalf makes some very good points. I just wonder if those points are too advanced for most of the members (hehe) of this forum?  Roll Eyes


Not at all, Moriarty. We just choose to ignore them. Instead, we chase G around trying to catch him out with our porkies.

It worked in Abu. It'll wear G down eventually. After that, we can have a Muslim-free board. Then we'll get rid of the apologists. And last, but most certainly not least, the tinted races.

"Sustainability", innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47435
At my desk.
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #312 - Feb 13th, 2018 at 8:20pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 12th, 2018 at 9:17pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 12th, 2018 at 7:39pm:
Most Muslims are not terrorists Brian. They just excuse terrorism, like Gandalf with his mindless collective of treacherous Jews meme.



Good point, FD, I remember now. G introduced the word meme.

You introduced the mindless collective of treacherous Jews with no individuality whatsoever, etc, etc, so unfair.


Karnal do you think I am misrepresenting Gandalf?

freediver wrote on May 27th, 2016 at 6:16pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 5:52pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 5:29pm:
FD calls them treacherous because they broke some pact with Muhammed.


Its scheming K - we call them scheming jews.


polite_gandalf wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 8:22pm:
freediver wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 6:22pm:
I've seen Gandalf use the 'mindless collective' and the treacherous Jews argument


Quite right - you saw me using them without me ever mentioning them. Clever eh?


freediver wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 9:30pm:
Every reference to "tribe" made by Gandalf below just happens to be a tribe of Jews.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 5th, 2013 at 10:27am:
freediver wrote on Dec 5th, 2013 at 8:26am:
If you think these 800 people acted as some kind of mindless collective

Thats exactly what they were.


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2013 at 7:38pm:
Also the treachery of the jews had nothing to do with them refusing to help the muslims.
Simple facts FD.


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 5th, 2013 at 3:11pm:
As I said, there was no real concept of individuality - your personality was literally defined by which tribe you belonged to. And the decisions that govern the tribe are very much decisions that are represented by all the individuals who make up the tribe. Thus there really is no question of collective guilt - no matter how abhorrent we find the term today.


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 4th, 2013 at 3:48pm:
Muhammad had been burnt before by granting another traitorous tribe free passage to leave the city - upon which they immediately started plotting against Medina and instigating hostilities.


polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 28th, 2015 at 4:08pm:
The leaders conspired - yes.

The rest of them had the opportunity to disown their treachery. They declined. So tough titties- off with their heads.


polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 28th, 2015 at 4:08pm:
What do you think the Banu Qurayza would have done to the muslims if their planned back-stabbing assault on Medina had succeeded?


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 2:05pm:
Like I keep saying, it is reasonable to accuse them of collective guilt, since at any time any individual had the opportunity to disassociate themselves from the decisions made on behalf of the tribe.


Gandalf is one of the good Muslims.


polite_gandalf wrote on May 24th, 2016 at 10:42am:
The phrase "treacherous jew argument" has obvious racist connotations. FD was obviously well aware of this when he put these words into my mouth.

I went to great lengths to point out their treachery had nothing to do with them being jews. FD deliberately set out to play the race card by using the term "treacherous jew", which he knows perfectly well is a notorious phrase heavily laden with racist overtones. But their treachery is a matter of simple historical fact - they conspired with the people who were attempting to annihilate Medina, in secret, in direct violation of the treaty they signed with Muhammad. But pointing that out is wacist innit.

The best FD can argue is that their treachery was justified, but treachery it was.



Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92344
Gender: male
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #313 - Feb 13th, 2018 at 9:25pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 13th, 2018 at 8:20pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 12th, 2018 at 9:17pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 12th, 2018 at 7:39pm:
Most Muslims are not terrorists Brian. They just excuse terrorism, like Gandalf with his mindless collective of treacherous Jews meme.



Good point, FD, I remember now. G introduced the word meme.

You introduced the mindless collective of treacherous Jews with no individuality whatsoever, etc, etc, so unfair.


Karnal do you think I am misrepresenting Gandalf?

freediver wrote on May 27th, 2016 at 6:16pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 5:52pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 5:29pm:
FD calls them treacherous because they broke some pact with Muhammed.


Its scheming K - we call them scheming jews.


polite_gandalf wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 8:22pm:
freediver wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 6:22pm:
I've seen Gandalf use the 'mindless collective' and the treacherous Jews argument


Quite right - you saw me using them without me ever mentioning them. Clever eh?


freediver wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 9:30pm:
Every reference to "tribe" made by Gandalf below just happens to be a tribe of Jews.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 5th, 2013 at 10:27am:
freediver wrote on Dec 5th, 2013 at 8:26am:
If you think these 800 people acted as some kind of mindless collective

Thats exactly what they were.


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2013 at 7:38pm:
Also the treachery of the jews had nothing to do with them refusing to help the muslims.
Simple facts FD.


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 5th, 2013 at 3:11pm:
As I said, there was no real concept of individuality - your personality was literally defined by which tribe you belonged to. And the decisions that govern the tribe are very much decisions that are represented by all the individuals who make up the tribe. Thus there really is no question of collective guilt - no matter how abhorrent we find the term today.


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 4th, 2013 at 3:48pm:
Muhammad had been burnt before by granting another traitorous tribe free passage to leave the city - upon which they immediately started plotting against Medina and instigating hostilities.


polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 28th, 2015 at 4:08pm:
The leaders conspired - yes.

The rest of them had the opportunity to disown their treachery. They declined. So tough titties- off with their heads.


polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 28th, 2015 at 4:08pm:
What do you think the Banu Qurayza would have done to the muslims if their planned back-stabbing assault on Medina had succeeded?


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 6th, 2013 at 2:05pm:
Like I keep saying, it is reasonable to accuse them of collective guilt, since at any time any individual had the opportunity to disassociate themselves from the decisions made on behalf of the tribe.


Gandalf is one of the good Muslims.


polite_gandalf wrote on May 24th, 2016 at 10:42am:
The phrase "treacherous jew argument" has obvious racist connotations. FD was obviously well aware of this when he put these words into my mouth.

I went to great lengths to point out their treachery had nothing to do with them being jews. FD deliberately set out to play the race card by using the term "treacherous jew", which he knows perfectly well is a notorious phrase heavily laden with racist overtones. But their treachery is a matter of simple historical fact - they conspired with the people who were attempting to annihilate Medina, in secret, in direct violation of the treaty they signed with Muhammad. But pointing that out is wacist innit.

The best FD can argue is that their treachery was justified, but treachery it was.





FD, why have you censored all the posts G was responding to?

Oh, that's right - G was quoting you.

"Freeedom", innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47435
At my desk.
Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #314 - Feb 15th, 2018 at 8:19pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 15th, 2018 at 1:10pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2017 at 7:25pm:
Aussie wrote on Mar 22nd, 2017 at 3:53pm:
Quote:
Even if they were Jews, and they were slaughtered?


What, according to the myth you perpetuate, were they slaughtered for?  Being Jewish per se?


According to Gandalf, for being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews.



No, FD, according to Gandalf for violating a treaty. According to you for being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews.

I'm curious. Do you uphold the use of porkies in your campaign against the Muselman?


Who violated the treaty Karnal? All of them, according to Gandalf, by virtue of them being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews.

BTW, the treaty does not actually exist either.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 ... 31
Send Topic Print