I think you should seriously consider laying off the caffeine.

Actually, I was more worried about your health rather than indulge in another one of your bizarre fantasy post.

Now that with Ted Cruz withdrawal from the race.  There is no real contest left.  So its safe to say the fight is on with Trump and Clinton.

I believe, in this election, the battle line is about the economy, the middle class, and the ever so divisive issue of immigration and race relation.   In this regard, if Trump is able to reinforce his image as "the boss", keep to the hard lines, and then attack Hilary Clinton's credentials.  Then, the white house would be his.    In comparison to other candidates, Trump is actually overall less conservative comparing to say Rand Paul.   Furthermore, despite the fact that US was ready for a mixed black/white president, but I am unsure if its ready for a lady president just yet.

It would be an interesting contest.   The key for Clinton camp is to expose that Trump is more talk than action.  Build an imagine that he is sexist, racist.   And expose the flaws in his policies.

Looks like I will vote for Gary Johnson in November, I voted for Ross Perot and against "Read my lips" daddy George Bush in 92. Why vote for the lesser of two evils when you still get evil?

INteresting

http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-election/donald-trumps-victory-over-ted-cruz-is-m...

issuevoter wrote on May 4^th, 2016 at 1:09pm:


we are definitely mediocre.
its hard to not become mediocre when people dont have to go above low consciousness living to survive and spread their DNA.
laziness, lack of motivation , addiction to dirty highs(drugs, alcohol, gambling, consumerism)...these are made possible in western society to our detriment.

someone living on the streets of manila or calcutta cannot live in low consciousness. The evolutionary pressure ensures he cannot be lazy, lack motivation, spend his day contructing a cry baby narrative.
In many way he is much blessed spiritually .
Growth is his only option, improvement is a given if he is to survive.

the comfortable person in the USA or Australia can easily find himself in scrub purgatory, coping but not thriving. he can go thru life with no improvement and no growth. This is not the path of the superior man.


My point is that in western democracies, dont present a picture of hope to the hopeless.
people say they want to be happy and prsoperous but i dispute that.
They are very comfortable living in complaint, misery and mediocrity and their egos prevent them from taking up any sort of "call to arms" becuase this requires a possible blow to the ego, if they should fail.
Better for the ego not to try at all 

aquascoot wrote on May 4^th, 2016 at 12:55pm:


What you are overlooking is that the most mediocre choice of all, is not bothering to vote at all.  Even during Black Jesus' campaigns the turnout was less than 60% - but nobody is even going to get out of bed for Hilary.  In contrast, Trumps fanbase is energised.  The energy that carried Obama to victory has transferred to Trump.


I have previously stated that Hilary was going to be the next president (likely through fraud, but the means don't really matter) but I'm disavowing that right now.  I am even doubtful she's going to make it to the general election. 

She had one job - don't bugger up too greatly - and she was to be gifted the presidency on a silver platter.  But she has proven to be incapable of that, bumbling along with a campaign seemingly run by idiots.  They're not even trying to maintain the illusion of choice - they're running a lazy campaign with all the care and urgency of someone who knows it's rigged in their favour.  People won't appreciate being taken for a ride like that.  They cannot win an election against the dream team Trump has assembled.  She has outlived her usefulness, and will be thrown to the wolves soon.

Get this on record: