"It fails to report the tooth decay rates for each of the 84 geographical areas surveyed. This covers up the fact that there is no difference in the tooth decay rates of the fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas surveyed. The Brunelle/ Carlos study even fails to list the areas studied. As a result, they produce misleading illustrations; for example, their Figure 3 implies that Arizona and New Mexico have the lowest tooth decay rates, when, in fact, not a single area was surveyed in either of the two states."

"It fails to do the statistical analysis (or even provide the data, i.e., the standard deviation and sample number) necessary to determine whether the values found for F and NF areas are significantly different."

"It fails to report the data for the approximately 23,000 schoolchildren who were not life-time residents of either the F or NF areas (the partially fluoridated, PF group)....

He goes on to point out other significant flaws in this Brunelle and Carlos study.

Steelink C., Fowler M, Osborn M et al. Findings and recommendations of subcommittee on fluoridation. City of Tuscon AZ 1992 (PO Box 27210).
Also see: Chemical and Engineering News (7/27/92).

A study of Tuscon elementary children was performed by Cornelius Steelink, Professor Emeritus, Department of Chemistry, University of Arizona. The study was performed in order to determine the "benefits" of water fluoridation.

They compared tooth decay versus fluoride content in a child's neighborhood drinking water for 26,000 elementary school children.

Here are the results:

"...a positive correlation was revealed. In other words, the more fluoride a child drank, the more cavities appeared in the teeth.

He goes on to state:

"Since this was an unusual result, our subcommittee looked for other relevant factors. Family incomes was compared to tooth decay. An excellent inverse relation was found for these 26,000 children: the higher the income, the lower the number of decayed teeth. Other anecdotal evidence gathered by our committee included lack of access to dental facilities, poverty, diet, and oral hygiene as contributing factors to tooth decay in this group of children.

In the final report, the subcommittee stated that there was no obvious relation of fluoride content in municipal water to the prevention of tooth decay in Tucson, and because there are multiple causes of tooth decay, a decision to fluoridate would still leave pockets of poor dental health in Tucson. .... However, when the full Citizens Water Advisory Committee reviewed our report in June 1992, it recommended (on a split vote) that the city council go ahead and fluoridate the water. The principal argument for this vote was: 'Even though fluoridation doesn't appear to be effective, let's rely on the advice of the public health officials. After all, they're the experts.'"

I saw a graph with the percentage of tooth decay plotted against fluoride concentration. As soon as it goes over .6 ppm, the decay goes way up.

"Influence of social class and fluoridation on child dental health" Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 13 37-41 1985.

This study examined the influence of social class (environmental and lifestyle factors, diet, etc.) and fluoridation on dental health. It showed that dental health as continued to improve equally in both fluoridated and unfluoridated areas and that the level of dental health was strongly related to social class.

A similar result (with slightly better teeth in unfluoridated areas) was found in Colquohoun J. "Child dental health differences in New Zealand" Community Health Studies 11 85-90 1987.

ALERT #3

The last two sections (2, 3) show that it is not lack of fluoride that leads to decay but things such as "lack of access to dental facilities, poverty, diet, and oral hygiene." A number of studies were performed by persons interested in keeping the fluoridation myth alive. One way to skew the results was to compare two areas, one fluoridated and one non-fluoridated but not take into account other factors. If a non-fluoridated area with lack of dental facilities, poverty, poor diet and hygiene was compared against a nearby, yet more well-to-do fluoridated area, it becomes very easy to "prove" (wink, wink) that fluoridation is beneficial. This type of nonsense was done several times in order to keep the fluoridation myth alive.

One of many studies that have this flaw is:

Jackson, D., et al. "Fluoridation in Anglesey 1983: a Clinical Study of Dental Caries" British Dental Journal 1985: 158: 45.

The two areas being compared, while adjacent, were vastly different.

Ziegelbecker RC, Ziegelbecker R. "WHO data on dental caries and natural water fluoride levels." Fluoride 26 263-266 1993.

and

Ziegelbecker R. "Fluoridated water and teeth" Fluoride 14 123-128 1981

Both of these studies are from large data set showing that there is no correlation between caries and fluoride concentration and no improvement in dental health from fluoride. In the 1981 study, for example, Ziegelbecker made of random sampling of all available data on caries prevalence. He selected 48,000 12-14 year-old children from 136 community water supplies in seven countries.

Diesendorf M. "The mystery of declining tooth decay" Nature 322 125-129 1986.

Summary

Large temporal reductions in tooth decay, which cannot be attributed to fluoridation, have been observed in both unfluoridated and fluoridated areas of at least eight developed countries over the past thirty years

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 4:14pm:


to focus on a semantoid reflects your acumen in digesting the rest of the valuable and studied evidence

this speaks volumes unto your various afflictions

Quote:

Quote:


in short fluoridation is simply a means to poison people

keep them sick and reliant on pharmaceutical drugs

of which both pastafarian and taverner are in receivence of frequent and copious doses

forgiven

namaste

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 5:49pm:



No - it is a well known fact.

dear master Light,

you are forgiven for not knowing that Uranium is in your water.

It's a heavy metal like lead which builds up &

is radioactive as well.

namaste

Bobby. wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 7:13pm:



Dont forget the radioactive potassium in our food

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:24pm:



Not this pineal glandf crap again. plus vaccines arent given IV