Setanta wrote on Feb 7
th, 2016 at 12:32am:
mothra wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 11:27pm:
Setanta wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 11:21pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 11:13pm:
Setanta wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 11:09pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 11:06pm:
Setanta wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 11:05pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 11:02pm:
Some places are more barbaric than they have been historically.
Colonialism made a very big mess of much of the world.
Hence why I said above about some reverting. Colonialism in some way shape or form is us. That's what we do.
To the detriment of the many for the gains of the few.
The only thing to do is fight human nature and nature itself. We can rise above. History says otherwise. Sometimes it pays to embrace pragmatism, know our nature, not excuse it.
I believe our nature is evolving. There is more concern for the plight of the under-privileged than there has ever been in our history.
There is concerted efforts being made by an ever-growing number of people to expand the definition of humanity towards something more compassionate and globally minded.
It's the hundredth monkey principle. Enough people have to care. More care every day. I have a tremendous amount of faith in the up and coming generation.
Human nature, like everything about us, evolves. It's time we stopped citing our colonial past as something that just came naturally and focus instead on the mistakes that were made. All the better to correct them.
I'm not so sure there is a lot of evolution in our nature, it's in our ideas. That is what makes us special, we can realise our ideas.
It's not in my nature to dominate anybody, or cause any grief or pain to them. Did that come with my ideas or am i simply, along with the millions of people doing humanitarian work throughout the world, an aberration?
No, i think human nature has evolved. Is evolving.
Not normally mine either.
If things went to shyte though and it became necessary, I'd be looking out for my own. You'd be crazy not to.
Agreed. But this ties back in with your assessment that the human species has never been better off.
We who are housed, watered, educated, medicated and fed have the luxury to cast our minds further. This again ties in with theory on ideas versus human nature.
I don't know that i agree with either of your theories. I think the human race is in dire straights and that altruism is a growing phenomena.
I have, for example, the opportunity afforded to me by the society i live in to be a vegetarian. It would be difficult if not impossible for me to elect this lifestyle choice in other societues. If needs dictated, i would kill an animal with my own bare hands to feed my children. I would also hip and shoulder people for food sacks and clean water.
My ideology is a luxury afforded me by my affluence, or as you suggested, humans being in a better place than they have ever been.
I contest that though, for the deeper nuances of human nature can only be expressed from a position of relative comfort. As you say. to fend for my own i would do just about anything.
THe fact is we have more people advocating for the disadvantaged than ever before. As those people develop, they will remember kindness and charity and hopefully replicate it.
Kindness, compassion and empathy are contagious.
I argue that these attributes are very much a part of human nature. I argue that it is by these attributes that we have continuation of our species, more than the dog eat dog survivalism you describe.'