aquascoot wrote on Jan 27^th, 2016 at 12:48pm:

-----------> you don't even know what the left is 

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 25^th, 2016 at 8:42pm:

Armchair still thinks lib voters are proud of copper internet ... armchair knows the world turns and the liberal party will be left with the stench of copper internet for the entire asian century we built and he cries every night knowing THAT I SPEAK THE TRUTH!



ARMCHAIR KNOWS PEOPLE DIED FOR THIS COUNTRY AND TO SHOVE COPPER INTERNET UP ITS ASS WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN OR FORGIVEN 

GOOD LUCK IN THE NURSING HOME BUDDY WHEN YOUR FAMILY SHOW YOU HOW MUCH THEY LOVE THE COPPER INTERNET YOU BOUGHT THEM WITH THEIR TAXES 

I MEAN 

lefties seem to think that righties are involved in some sort of 'power grab" when i assert that leadership naturally belongs to the right.
its very similar to feminists and beta males getting upset when i assert that leadership is the natural role of the male.

Its not some "prize"
Its not some thing i think the right and males should aspire to for selfish reasons.

leadership comes from a sense of contribution when it comes from the right.

selfish people on the right  can just stay at home and trade shares and skin super and be lazy.

When a rightie steps up and wants to lead, it comes from a place of wanting to "give" of himself.

very similar to when a male steps up and "leads" in the family.
its the lazy beta male who lets his wife lead, so he can sit on the couch and watch football (or the ABC).

Leadership is a solemn responsibility and a hard grind and a thankless task.

Only the on track, charged dynamic , successful, self actualised male with the values of the right is suited , or indeed capable of doing this difficult job well.

we all benefit when real men lead us.

you certainly could benefit from being around some real rightard alpha men DRAH.

Labor voter wrote on Jan 27^th, 2016 at 3:12pm:



i would be happy to see 2 alpha-led parties fight it out.
competition is good.
think of it like Bill Gates v Steve Jobs,
the entrepreneurial business cream rising to the top in a spirit of contribution and competition.

i am not happy to see beta males (or worse females) trying to gain the ascendency and "lead" the country.

whiney emotional women (plibosek, gillard, hansen young) who are governed by their emotions are unfit for leadership.
those raised in the union movement have led a life dominated by complaining, whining, sooking and writing a cry-baby narrative. such beta males cannot have a sense of contribution.
To be parasitic is not to lead.

Labor voter wrote on Jan 27^th, 2016 at 3:12pm:


I wonder if you got the satire. Being a leftie you are of course completely humourless.

mariacostel wrote on Jan 27^th, 2016 at 4:40pm:

It was LONGY said that last line! 

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 27^th, 2016 at 6:09pm:


After the stunning success of the alpha males Mr Newman and Mr Napthine, liberals in perpetuity is the last thing we need.  And the alpha male Mr Abbott what a stunning success.