It has been a long time coming.

This new party is where Hanson's One Nation left off, but with the difference that it is media-savvy, articulate, knows its brief, and isn't 'over-the-top' and laughable from certain perspectives.

It will be launching itself at the end of this month as a fully kitted-up, legally authenticated political entity ready to compete with the established parties for our votes.

Read on ...

"So, exactly what is ALA? (Australian Liberty Alliance)

The party stemmed from an Islam-critical organisation called the Q Society, named after the Melbourne suburb of Kew (Q) where the initial planning meetings were held in 2010.

The society is aligned with the global SION (Stop The Islamisation Of Nations) movement headed by Pamela Geller, famed US freedom fighter and organiser of the Garland, Texas, Mohammed cartoon exhibition which ended in two dead jihadists.

“Q’s intent is to educate Australians on the Islamisation of our schools, food chains, judicial system and democratic institutions, implementing Islamic Sharia law, which has occurred in parts of the UK and Europe”, she explained.

“This ‘Islamisation by stealth’ is often done by claims of discrimination or victimisation, to which a tolerant society will succumb. No other religion makes such demands on societal institutions.

***

"Immigration Minister Chris Bowen granted the visa only after the Q Society had to postpone the tour due to the visa uncertainty.

The tour was overshadowed by a total of 30 venues cancelling, or refusing bookings, with some reneging on fully paid contracts two days before the scheduled event.

Companies and newspapers were too afraid to accept advertising, online ticket companies feared potential hacking attempts and the Westpac Bank was unwilling to process credit card payments for fear of reprisals.

***

"It would be wrong to classify the Q Society or the ALA as racist or bigoted. It supports immigration and says it has no objection to homosexuals. Its platform is non-racist and ethnically-inclusive. The Party’s policies call for a cohesive society, which promotes integration and not segregation.

“Tolerance” the Party says, “should be mutual. The teachings of Islam, which discriminate against non-Muslims, homosexuals and women, are incompatible with core Australian values.”

***

"“Each time I saw another victim of violence I’d ask myself what could motivate someone to do that to a fellow human being. My curiosity led me to do a lot of research into the psychology of violence. My opposition to Islam comes from that”, said Debbie.

Robinson said the catalyst for her awareness was a visit to Melbourne when she witnessed a violent anti-Israel rally. She picked up a flyer and found the organisers were the Muslim Students Association, Students for Palestine and the Socialist Alliance. She still has that flyer.

When she returned home she researched further. What she discovered about Islam horrified her. She decided to get involved in opposing the ideology. She looked for a political party with awareness or policies on Islam but found none. It was at this point in 2010 she discovered the fledgling Q Society.

Her first meeting was in Sydney with 12 members in attendance and Robinson volunteered to do whatever she could to help.

“I came into it purely as a humanitarian”, she said. “People who don’t know me wrongly accuse me of being a bigot or racist, but that’s never been me. I’ve always been a carer, which is why I became a nurse and why I’m now concerned about Islam.

“I’m not anti-Muslim, I’m anti-Islam. There’s a difference,” she explains with conviction.

***

"“Naïve or uneducated commentators talk wishfully of a ‘moderate’ Islam or ‘extreme’ Islam. But there is no moderate or extreme Islam. There is just one Islam. There are Muslims who are good people not because of Islam, but in spite of Islam.

“The minority that follows Islam to the letter, the ones who wish to practice ‘pure’ Islam, and copy their founder, are a threat. But how do you tell who they are in a community?

“The political class in Australia - and overseas – has looked the other way for too long, with leaders wrongly suggesting that Islamic jihad and beheadings ‘have nothing to do with Islam’.

***

link
   

                                      


They, and she,      still don't 'get it', imo.

Quote:








.




Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1418244166/15#15
Quote:





.





Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1431117115/1#1
Quote:




.




CRIMINAL INTENT, IN THE MOSLEM HEART
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1252898491/0#0
Quote:

"Unlike the USA we have no first amendment and the federal racial discrimination and state blasphemy laws (in Victoria) combined with the worst defamation laws in the world make free speech non existent here. Combine this with the inherent fear everyone has about Islam it’s like George Orwell’s 1984.
Australian politicians have no backbone and we don’t have the time to mess around waiting for them to do something".

link

link

Just watch as our Leftwing media tries its best to discredit this new party. They'll pull out all the stops to trash-and-vandalise what this party stands for.

But the more the White Ants of our Leftwing media try to hobble and bully the leadership and the aims of this new party, the more it will be drawing the public's attention to it and its goals - and that's for the better.

This party will crash-and-burn just as One Nation did if those who speak on its behalf come across in interviews as semi-literate rank amateurs with poor communication skills and with only a very tenuous grasp of their subject.

They are going to cop more flack than a Berlin air-raid.

Like I said elsewhere, our current leaders in the West are happy to reassure us that Islam is just like all other religions, but they never give us their understanding or reasoning.

They seem to avoid using the Word Islam, and for that reason attempts were made to limit the use of the name Islamic State because of negative connotations. Most of the media have given up on that appeasement.

They don't much like using the permutations of moslem either; probably for its Religion specific nature in regards to communities.

But the one they (Western Leaders)won't touch with a barge-pole is Infidel, because it stinks of the Arab-Persian view of the rest of the world. Our leaders will not use it because they cannot spin it  to come out any other way than Islamic and Muzzlim. And it is used in all Martyrdom and Jihadi propaganda.

That's OK with me, I don't mind being an Infidel. It shows where I stand with Muzzlims, and the problem they create in pluralistic societies.

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2015 at 7:26am:


So, they're going to discriminate against Muslims in order to show how tolerant they are.





You couldn't make this stuff up.

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2015 at 10:55am:


Now, who does that remind me of?

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2015 at 1:55pm:


Nor did I say there were.  But it will be interesting to see who they attract as a voter base, if you read what I actually wrote.

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2015 at 1:55pm:


And still managing to hold a straight face while saying that "Tolerance ... should be mutual."