Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Aug 11
th, 2015 at 2:13pm:
OK so I'll post it here, less the reference to Obama.
There have been many claims that the Gun Laws have stopped any mass shootings in Australia and that therefore they are a success.
The Lyndt Cafe and Monis proved that they are a failure.
All the ingredients were there for a massacre.
Monis had a firearm - the laws didn't stop him from acquiring it.
Monis' firearm was prohibited by the gun laws - he still got it.
his firearm was illegally modified - the gun laws didn't stop the modification.
Monis didn't have a firearms licence - he didn't comply with the gun laws.
Monis took hostages - the gun laws didn't stop him.
Monis murdered one person - the gun laws didn't stop him.
Monis had it in his power to murder many more people - the gun laws didn't stop him, he was stopped by men with guns.
Anyone care to refute the above?
You posted this a few days ago and a shall repeat the answer.
The fact that a law is not 100% effective is no reason to repeal that law. For example.
Drink driving.
People are caught drink driving every day.
People are frequently killed by drink drivers,
People have kept drink driving even though it has become illegal.
All of my statements are true, but none of them create a case against drink driving laws.
P.S the Lindt cafe technically does not qualify as a "mass shooting" since the perpetrator only shot one person.
This is a mass murder
http://news.yahoo.com/texas-police-5-children-3-adults-found-dead-110223005.html
I guess its a shame that America doesn't have a gun control scheme, otherwise the perpetrator(with a long history of violent offences) may not have been able to get a gun, and shoot his whole family.