Soren wrote on Jul 27
th, 2015 at 6:15pm:
Flying planes into the WTC in NYC cannot be ignored. ...
I agree. It ranks right up there alongside the attack on Pearl Harbour, at least as far as the Americans are concerned.
The biggest problem is the fact that an ideology is not a state, or a country, therefore there is no clear enemy against which a reprisal attack can be launched.
However, with this one combined action, radical Islam had declared war on the West. This then, resulted in the 'War on Terror' which has had no resolution since, and has merely inflamed tensions across the radical Islamic world.
Probably the greatest good to emerge from that tragedy is the reinforcement, at least in Western eyes, the similarity between the 'Untermensch' and the 'Kuffir', when viewed through the eyes of the differing opposition ideologies. The difference being that one of those ideologies was founded on the rhetoric of a 'modern' lunatic, and the other has had the benefit of being accepted and enforced over thousands of years as the voice of a 'prophet', and has a much more committed following.
Never forget that Islam sided with the Reich, and sidled out of the way when the going got tough.
I'm a lapsed Catholic, do I fear for my life? I can comment about the wealth held by the Vatican while crying for donations for the poor - but I never fear for my head.
Once a Muslim, always in Islam - and forever opposed to the 'Kuffir' and their way of life and religions.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Thereby declaring yourself 'apostate' and subject to the rules and penalties that apply.
Therein lies the difference.
You’re wrong. "Islam" did not ally itself with Nazi Germany. All throughout South East Asia, Muslims (not "Islam") fought against the Reich’s allies, Japan.
"Islam" has nuffin’ to do wiv whatever you’re on about here.