Brian Ross wrote on Jul 11
th, 2015 at 1:19pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jul 11
th, 2015 at 12:12pm:
The solution to our feral deer problem is shooting them and eating them.
Simplistic economics, Baron. By placing an economic value on the subject you place an incentive on their continued existence and breeding, for hunting from which the State makes money.
If you were really interested in their elimination you would fund biological research to find a Myxomatosis like biological control agent. Yet you don't. You prefer to show how manly and tough you by paying for a license to hunt the fell beast.
If you want to talk economics do some research on what these feral pests are costing us from agriculture to city folk doing studies along with wages of people who manage these pests,you could add figures for pre 1996 gun laws to today to see how much more we are paying.
If biological agents like Myxomatsis worked why do we still have rabbits in plague proportions in country areas,it results in a slow cruel death compared to shooting.
The rabbit proof fence was supposed to keep rabbits out,what did that cost to fence off the country?
We have millions of rabbits yet cannot even supply Akubra hats with rabbit skins so they import them from Russia.
I have a friend with a property near Dalgety,the snow has brought the deer down to lower altitutdes,he wants me to shoot some deer.
He has been given a Deer Control Order under the Deer act 2006 sect 8.
8 (4) Says I don't need a game licence if subject to a deer control order.
Interesting how deer are the only species where 1080 cannot be used to poison them,they should ban 1080.
http://austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/da200649/s8.htmlI see this as helping a friend out.
The RSPCA say shooting is the most humane method for dealing with deer,are you suggesting I use methods considered less humane?
We have animal cruelty laws I have to abide by I cannot club them to death with a lump of wood like our ancient ancestors did, I prefer guns because it's the most humane method according to the RSPCA,only a despicable hoplophobic cretin would consider forcing someone to use a less humane method.
Quote:I disagree with the RSPCA on heart/lung shots they are required for professional aerial cullers.
When they allowed hunting in national parks and state forests which was opposed by many they did not allow night hunting on safety grounds.
It's a gun confiscating licence revoking offence to have a firearm and spotlight after sunset and before sunrise.