greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 19
th, 2015 at 8:59pm:
John Smith wrote on Jan 19
th, 2015 at 8:55pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 19
th, 2015 at 8:51pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 19
th, 2015 at 8:20pm:
Is there a correlation between the lack of firearms in society and violent crime, or the reverse?
As surprising as this may be for you, no guns = no people being injured by firearms.
no knives means no one gets stabbed either, no cars mean no car accidents, no water means no drownings (except for the fish, they'll all drown) no work means no workplace accidents
why don't you ban all of those?
None of them, apart from guns, were originally designed to kill.
Any other questions?
You appear to be an intelligent individual, you appear to use the same quote on various postings.
Guns were originally designed to kill. I take exception to that.
In the beginning MAN hunted, food was the objective, I am not certain of the order, however primitive man must of used rocks and then other projectiles to kill game, FOR FOOD. Then spears and the bow and arrow.
Man the invented gun powder, the Chinese I believe, to use in mortal combat, NO, but for fireworks.
Firearms are just a better hunting tool, not designed to KILL, as you wrote.
The nuclear energy was originally envisaged to assist mankind, designed to create nuclear power, for the GOOD of mankind, not create a nuclear bomb. Hence you argument sucks.
When you are disarmed and defenceless, whom do you want to protect you from those who want what you posses?
How do you stop a foreign nation from coming to take what your country possesses, kind words and offerings will do nothing to appease those who want what is most dear to you.
Hence, please explain the methods of safeguarding what you hold dear, as there are MANY in the world who are possibly are not as charitable as you.