____ wrote on Nov 23
rd, 2014 at 1:25pm:
To be pro a sustainable post fossil fuel economy isn't anti development.
And as for vital, I would suggest agriculture would be more vital. Without it Gina would shrink away to skin and bones.
We don't have any viable alternatives to fossil fuel at present, the Greenswine must be giving his crack pipe a good workout.
Of course the Greens want us to go back to horse and buggy along with square riggers for shipping and forget about flying that uses fossil fuel.
Planes cannot run on renewable energy, the large ships that move cargo use fossil fuel.
Trucks need fossil fuel, cars might be ok with electric if they can accept crappy range.
The Greens hate the Farmers as well, the burden of compliance with Kyoto was shifted onto farmers and nobody else.
The greens want to take semi auto firearms from farmers who along with professional shooters are the only ones allowed to have them.
The Greens are all hat and no cattle.
on the planet along with peak soil, peak water, peak fertiliser and unpredictable weather due to human caused climate change. Top dollar is available for quality and reliable food production exports.
We have got a great option for replacing our addiction to fossil fuel revenue.
Greens are the best friends of regional and rural Australia.