ColdFact wrote on Nov 20
th, 2014 at 6:44pm:
Another sus factor of the film/video is the titles. Film titles have to be included in the editing, and it would have been extremely rare for an amateur to have these titles edited onto the film. So the titles may have been added later on -- so what else is kind of manufactured in this supposedly original footage?
I would say, it wasn't an amateur, more like someone that had pro film skills, maybe even a GI that is trained to take movies and go to war to document the account of it.
We see those movies of real war footage.
It is obviously someone that has an understanding of how buildings and gardens are, and maybe, with the onset of WW2, took many videos of 'how things were' before being destroyed?
I thought of your comments ColdFact, as I watched a doco last night about how the 1st WW came to be, it was on late and ended even later, but was fascinating.
There was films taken in colour during 1914, of life as it was, before the 1st WW, yes, in colour, now that's even earlier than 1940.
Would love to know more about the person that took these films...their life, background, skills, etc. And how this came to be, among things, stored in a garage, to be sold later at a 'garage sale'.....how things turn up where they do, almost sad really, but not really, it has gained it's fame, deservedly.
Thank goodness it wasn't all taken to the rubbish tip, as some people do with 'old stuff'.