|
longweekend58
|
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22 nd, 2014 at 5:57pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22 nd, 2014 at 5:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22 nd, 2014 at 4:57pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22 nd, 2014 at 4:51pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22 nd, 2014 at 3:40pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22 nd, 2014 at 2:56pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22 nd, 2014 at 12:59pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22 nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21 st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21 st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21 st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread. I dislike personal abuse.
Gillard was much better than rudd.
not reall a challenge though, was it? all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply. No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply. Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading. While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description. How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!! perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word. that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown. That's simple: you suggest women don't possess necessary qualities to be leaders. And by being disparaging to men by way of calling them women, you suggest that it's in someway bad to be a woman. Bloody misogynist! Ps: I don't think anyone who worships mythical creatures can call others stupid  that's the most idiotic line of thinking Ive heard from you on basically any topic. first you start with a bald-faced lie (women don't have what it takes to be leaders) that I have never said and certainly didn't say in this thread. then you extrapolate Kevin Rudd to 'all men' and then imply something that was never stated in any shape, form or hint. using your logic I can misinterpret anything you say to be a pro-communist, putin loving, 5th columnist pack of lies. I can construct an argument as equally invalid as yours to support it.] DUMB AS... did you not say you tried to disparage Rudd? You did that by saying he was our first women leader as he had no balls. Work out now how it's very easy to extrapolate what you mean, you misogynist! Gotta ask yourself...would jebus be proud? I am still surprised at how you can so deliberately misinterpret a statement that has zero reference to Gillard into one about her. It was a rather obviously slight on Rudd or is the familiar phrase 'you hit like a girl' a sideways attack on Gillard too... coz it was in used years before she was born. wtf you on about? When did I say it was an attack on Gillard? I said that by suggesting you can disparage a male by suggesting they are female is inadvertently misogynistic because you're suggesting somehow it's bad to be a female, as opposed to a male. Not to mention that you suggest good leadership involves having characteristics only a male has, and because Rudd "didn't" have them it must mean he was a woman, hence bad. You see longie? Watch what you say. It wasnt' funny, it was rather juvenile. And in that juvenile moment you got yourself caught out being the same type of sexist pig that your lover boy Tony is. 'you hit like a girl' has been part of the aussie lexicon for a century or more. if you don't understand that then that is kinda your problem. I'm sure I don't understand Russian idioms or slan either but then again I am not presuming to.
|
Forum
Pages: 
