Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Do you believe in the manned moon landings?

Yes without doubt    
  31 (79.5%)
No. It was completely staged    
  2 (5.1%)
I am not sure one way or the other    
  6 (15.4%)




Total votes: 39
« Created by: longweekend58 on: Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:43pm »

Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test. (Read 6576 times)
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:42pm
 
As this forum becomes cluttered with the detritus of the conspiracy theorists that believe nothing unless it comes to them in a dream or they read it on a website run by a mental patient, it is perhaps time to bring up the single biggest conspiracy theory that forms the litmus test of the legions of tinfoil hat wearers - the moon landings.

Despite massive overwhelming evidence there remains a stubborn small percentage of people - mostly conspiracy theorists - who refuse to believe that man landed on the moon in 1969 and returned there 6 more times for 5 more landings.

So to see who here is a real tinfoil hat wearer or merely dabbling in the insane it is time to see just who believes and who doesn't.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #1 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:43pm
 
poll added.  be brave.  reveal yourself.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #2 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:44pm
 
This will last about an hour in the completely wrong forum.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #3 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:45pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:42pm:
As this forum becomes cluttered with the detritus of the conspiracy theorists that believe nothing unless it comes to them in a dream or they read it on a website run by a mental patient, it is perhaps time to bring up the single biggest conspiracy theory that forms the litmus test of the legions of tinfoil hat wearers - the moon landings.

Despite massive overwhelming evidence there remains a stubborn small percentage of people - mostly conspiracy theorists - who refuse to believe that man landed on the moon in 1969 and returned there 6 more times for 5 more landings.

So to see who here is a real tinfoil hat wearer or merely dabbling in the insane it is time to see just who believes and who doesn't.

says the climate change denier.

Or are you talking about armpit? Wink
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #4 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:48pm
 
Its time wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:44pm:
This will last about an hour in the completely wrong forum.


it is actually in the RIGHT place. It speaks to the calibre of people who post in this forum.  but you are probably right. The moderators are next to useless and moving threads around from popular forums to unknown ones is one of the few things they ever do.

so do you believe in the moon landings?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #5 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:49pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:45pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:42pm:
As this forum becomes cluttered with the detritus of the conspiracy theorists that believe nothing unless it comes to them in a dream or they read it on a website run by a mental patient, it is perhaps time to bring up the single biggest conspiracy theory that forms the litmus test of the legions of tinfoil hat wearers - the moon landings.

Despite massive overwhelming evidence there remains a stubborn small percentage of people - mostly conspiracy theorists - who refuse to believe that man landed on the moon in 1969 and returned there 6 more times for 5 more landings.

So to see who here is a real tinfoil hat wearer or merely dabbling in the insane it is time to see just who believes and who doesn't.

says the climate change denier.

Or are you talking about armpit? Wink


so do you believe in the moon landings or not?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #6 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm
 
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #7 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:56pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


tinfoil hat wearer number one!!  naturally you ignore the massive, massive amount of evidence and go simply with your uneducated unintelligent 'feelings' on the matter.

BTW the 'commies' accepted it happened without question.  but no courage to vote no in the poll?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #8 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:57pm
 
Greenswine...
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #9 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:59pm
 
Grendel wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:57pm:


are you surprised?  I'm not.  How people can be so easily fooled and be so gullible to not believe the massive amounts of evidence is indication of a mental defect.  once again, the shoe fits.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #10 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:03pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:56pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


tinfoil hat wearer number one!!  naturally you ignore the massive, massive amount of evidence and go simply with your uneducated unintelligent 'feelings' on the matter.

BTW the 'commies' accepted it happened without question.  but no courage to vote no in the poll?



So rather than debate, you are just going to claim there is massive evidence without showing any, and then act childish and call others names.

I understand you couldn't face yet another loss in a debate and so will go find a grown up thread.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: do you believ in the moon landings
Reply #11 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:07pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:03pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:56pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


tinfoil hat wearer number one!!  naturally you ignore the massive, massive amount of evidence and go simply with your uneducated unintelligent 'feelings' on the matter.

BTW the 'commies' accepted it happened without question.  but no courage to vote no in the poll?



So rather than debate, you are just going to claim there is massive evidence without showing and any, and then act childish and call others names.

I understand you couldn't face yet another loss in a debate and so will go find a grown up thread.


the evidence for the moon landings is so enormous that only tinfoil hat wearers dare to dispute it.  you will find the conspiracy theorists populated by the disadvantaged, the marginalised, the stupid and the mentally ill.  the fact your beloved soviet union accepted it occurred has not yet resonated with you, has it?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #12 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:08pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:03pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:56pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


tinfoil hat wearer number one!!  naturally you ignore the massive, massive amount of evidence and go simply with your uneducated unintelligent 'feelings' on the matter.

BTW the 'commies' accepted it happened without question.  but no courage to vote no in the poll?



So rather than debate, you are just going to claim there is massive evidence without showing any, and then act childish and call others names.

I understand you couldn't face yet another loss in a debate and so will go find a grown up thread.

Is a global telecast open to global scrutiny enough for you.
Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
doyou belive in the moon landings?
Reply #13 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:11pm
 
Grendel wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:08pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:03pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:56pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


tinfoil hat wearer number one!!  naturally you ignore the massive, massive amount of evidence and go simply with your uneducated unintelligent 'feelings' on the matter.

BTW the 'commies' accepted it happened without question.  but no courage to vote no in the poll?



So rather than debate, you are just going to claim there is massive evidence without showing any, and then act childish and call others names.

I understand you couldn't face yet another loss in a debate and so will go find a grown up thread.

Is a global telecast open to global scrutiny enough for you.
Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I think the million people involved in the project and the 10,000 intimately involved with it who would have had to be in on a conspiracy to make it happen.

as one American President once said 'if 6 people know a secret then it is public knowledge'
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25115
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #14 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:24pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


Spoken like a true Commie!
Back to top
 

Scott Morrison DID wipe the floor with Bull Shitten!!! Smiley Smiley Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #15 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:27pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:24pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


Spoken like a true Commie!


spoken by a true simpletone as well.  Green-slime is not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #16 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:28pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:24pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


Spoken like a true Commie!



Democratic socialist actually. Considered being a communist when I was around nine and decided not for me
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #17 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:31pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:28pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:24pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


Spoken like a true Commie!



Democratic socialist actually. Considered being a communist when I was around nine and decided not for me


a pity you didn't decide to be educated and informed as well.  then you might not be the laughing stock you are on this thread.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #18 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:31pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:56pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


tinfoil hat wearer number one!!  naturally you ignore the massive, massive amount of evidence and go simply with your uneducated unintelligent 'feelings' on the matter.

BTW the 'commies' accepted it happened without question.  but no courage to vote no in the poll?


According to some Russian docos I've seen since the wall came down, the Russians were never going to get there
first with their technology, and by 1969 they knew it. That's why they then decided to concentrate on MIR.

But, you are correct.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13988
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #19 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:32pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:43pm:
poll added.  be brave.  reveal yourself.




A clear and obvious
YES, WITHOUT A DOUBT


A lot of the
NO
beliefs come from "unconventional" religions - such as
ISKCON
(Hare Krishnas)


http://krishna.org/man-on-the-moon-a-colossal-hoax-that-cost-billions-of-dollars...

I'm not sure if there's a listing anywhere of the belief of all other religions on the matter ?



Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #20 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:35pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:32pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:43pm:
poll added.  be brave.  reveal yourself.




A clear and obvious
YES, WITHOUT A DOUBT


A lot of the
NO
beliefs come from "unconventional" religions - such as
ISKCON
(Hare Krishnas)


http://krishna.org/man-on-the-moon-a-colossal-hoax-that-cost-billions-of-dollars...

I'm not sure if there's a listing anywhere of the belief of all other religions on the matter ?





I don't think any of the major religions even had an opinion on it.  The vast, vast majority of people accepted it as indisputable fact. After all, why wouldn't you?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #21 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:40pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
Its time wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:44pm:
This will last about an hour in the completely wrong forum.


it is actually in the RIGHT place. It speaks to the calibre of people who post in this forum.  but you are probably right. The moderators are next to useless and moving threads around from popular forums to unknown ones is one of the few things they ever do.

so do you believe in the moon landings?


If we are getting into people whacky beliefs, I wonder how many believe in a personal saviour, hell, heaven, praying and all that other nonsense.

Where do you sit with with that longweekend? Are you a loon? Do you believe the theory that god came to earth as a man?

No, I don't believe the moon landing was faked.
No, I don't believe the other lunacy I posted above either. How about you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #22 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:45pm
 
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:40pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
Its time wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:44pm:
This will last about an hour in the completely wrong forum.


it is actually in the RIGHT place. It speaks to the calibre of people who post in this forum.  but you are probably right. The moderators are next to useless and moving threads around from popular forums to unknown ones is one of the few things they ever do.

so do you believe in the moon landings?


If we are getting into people whacky beliefs, I wonder how many believe in a personal saviour, hell, heaven, praying and all that other nonsense.

Where do you sit with with that longweekend? Are you a loon? Do you believe the theory that god came to earth as a man?

No, I don't believe the moon landing was faked.
No, I don't believe the other lunacy I posted above either. How about you?


if you want a thread on that then start one.  but this is about the moon landings and how to identify a card-carrying tinfoil hat wearee.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #23 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm
 
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.

a. solar radiation
b. bake beans for breakfast
c. a hoax moon landing

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Datalife
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2405
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #24 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:50pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm:
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.

a. solar radiation
b. bake beans for breakfast
c. a hoax moon landing



It is enough for me to know that you believe the moon landings did not happen.   Sort of reinforces the impression I had of you.   Grin
Back to top
 

"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy".

Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007
 
IP Logged
 
Carl D
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8361
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #25 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:53pm
 
Come on, Greens. Don't be silly. Roll Eyes

The flag(s) were wired (i.e. had stiff wires inside to make them rigid) so they looked like they were 'fluttering' in the wind.

Anyway, I think we need a bit of humour in this thread...

http://stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm Grin

And, yes, I believe the Moon landings were real (and I have voted accordingly).
Back to top
 

"Masks are sand in the gears of the economy" - some f-wit pollie or big business CEO.
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #26 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:54pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:45pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:40pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
Its time wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:44pm:
This will last about an hour in the completely wrong forum.


it is actually in the RIGHT place. It speaks to the calibre of people who post in this forum.  but you are probably right. The moderators are next to useless and moving threads around from popular forums to unknown ones is one of the few things they ever do.

so do you believe in the moon landings?


If we are getting into people whacky beliefs, I wonder how many believe in a personal saviour, hell, heaven, praying and all that other nonsense.

Where do you sit with with that longweekend? Are you a loon? Do you believe the theory that god came to earth as a man?

No, I don't believe the moon landing was faked.
No, I don't believe the other lunacy I posted above either. How about you?


if you want a thread on that then start one.  but this is about the moon landings and how to identify a card-carrying tinfoil hat wearee.


I think my post fits very well with that which I have highlighted in your post, would't you agree? Are you a conspiracy theorist if you believe there is a devil going around leading people astray? The moon landing is not the be-all and end-all of finding loons.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #27 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:57pm
 
Datalife wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:50pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm:
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.

a. solar radiation
b. bake beans for breakfast
c. a hoax moon landing



It is enough for me to know that you believe the moon landings did not happen.   Sort of reinforces the impression I had of you.   Grin



I do not know one way or the other. My position is not fixed and so if posters from those that religiously believe in the first moon landing can supply logical answers to a number of questions I have then I am happy to change my opinion concerning the supposed first landing.

Now if people can't answer these question, will those that religiously believe move there opinion to the maybe group?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 32658
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #28 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:57pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.



Good Grief
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Carl D
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8361
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #29 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:59pm
 
Back to top
 

"Masks are sand in the gears of the economy" - some f-wit pollie or big business CEO.
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #30 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:01pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:57pm:
Datalife wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:50pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm:
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.

a. solar radiation
b. bake beans for breakfast
c. a hoax moon landing



It is enough for me to know that you believe the moon landings did not happen.   Sort of reinforces the impression I had of you.   Grin



I do not know one way or the other. My position is not fixed and so if posters from those that religiously believe in the first moon landing can supply logical answers to a number of questions I have then I am happy to change my opinion concerning the supposed first landing.

Now if people can't answer these question, will those that religiously believe move there opinion to the maybe group?


There is bugger all gravity and no atmosphere on the moon, Greens. If you get something moving, it will continue moving for a period as the physical forces that would stop it are negligible.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 32658
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #31 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:01pm
 
one i heard recently was that yuri gargarin never actually landed  back on earth in sputnik.

he bailed and parachuted and the russians got another sputnik to where he landed (in great secrecy) so that he could be photographed  emerging from the vehicle
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #32 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:04pm
 
What of the different direction of the shadows?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #33 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:09pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
What of the different direction of the shadows?



I answered your first question but I'm not going to run through every question you have. Google it. There should be hundreds of reputable sites that go through them all.
Try this for a start: http://science.howstuffworks.com/moon-landing-hoax.htm
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #34 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:12pm
 
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:09pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
What of the different direction of the shadows?



I answered your first question but I'm not going to run through every question you have. Google it. There should be hundreds of reputable sites that go through them all.
Try this for a start: http://science.howstuffworks.com/moon-landing-hoax.htm



There has not been a logical answer supplied.
Thats why I suspect the first moon landing was faked.

I don't religiously believe something just because the mass of people do. Do you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For War Crimes.
Reply #35 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:14pm
 
Question Three

Longweekend  ... coming out of hiding yet?
Back to top
 

moon-stuff012.jpg (53 KB | 49 )
moon-stuff012.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #36 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:16pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:09pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
What of the different direction of the shadows?



I answered your first question but I'm not going to run through every question you have. Google it. There should be hundreds of reputable sites that go through them all.
Try this for a start: http://science.howstuffworks.com/moon-landing-hoax.htm



There has not been a logical answer supplied.
Thats why I suspect the first moon landing was faked.

I don't religiously believe something just because the mass of people do. Do you?


My guess would be optical illusion due to the lay of the land but I'll go search for you and edit this post in a minute.

edit: http://space.about.com/od/frequentlyaskedquestions/tp/LunarLandingHoax.htm
Quote:
5. Why Do The Shadows Point In Different Directions?

Image Credit: NASA
In some of the photos, shadows for different objects in the images point in different directions. If the Sun is causing the shadows, shouldn't they all point in the same direction? Well, yes and no. They would all point in the same direction if everything was on the same level. This, however was not the case. Because of the uniformly grey terrain of the Moon, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish changes in elevation. However, these changes can influence the apparent direction of shadows for objects in the frame. In this image the shadow of the lander points directly to the right, while the astronauts shadow points down and to the right. This is because the Moons surface is at a slight incline where he is standing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13988
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #37 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:25pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm:
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.







An imperfect example of
perpetual motion


The flag first began moving when the pole was stabbed into the moon's surface
As there was no atmosphere - and little gravity - it just bounced backward and forward, till it EVENTUALLY wore itself out, after a LONG time




Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #38 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:27pm
 
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:16pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:09pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
What of the different direction of the shadows?



I answered your first question but I'm not going to run through every question you have. Google it. There should be hundreds of reputable sites that go through them all.
Try this for a start: http://science.howstuffworks.com/moon-landing-hoax.htm



There has not been a logical answer supplied.
Thats why I suspect the first moon landing was faked.

I don't religiously believe something just because the mass of people do. Do you?


My guess would be optical illusion due to the lay of the land but I'll go search for you and edit this post in a minute.

edit: http://space.about.com/od/frequentlyaskedquestions/tp/LunarLandingHoax.htm
Quote:
5. Why Do The Shadows Point In Different Directions?

Image Credit: NASA
In some of the photos, shadows for different objects in the images point in different directions. If the Sun is causing the shadows, shouldn't they all point in the same direction? Well, yes and no. They would all point in the same direction if everything was on the same level. This, however was not the case. Because of the uniformly grey terrain of the Moon, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish changes in elevation. However, these changes can influence the apparent direction of shadows for objects in the frame. In this image the shadow of the lander points directly to the right, while the astronauts shadow points down and to the right. This is because the Moons surface is at a slight incline where he is standing.


How could hills cause such large angular differences if it is as you have posted, a slight incline.
In the image above the lunar module’s shadow clearly contradicts that of the rocks in the foreground at almost a 45 degree angle.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19597
Perth
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #39 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:30pm
 
Quote:
There have been six manned moon landings -
•Apollo 11 landed 20 July 1969
•Apollo 12 landed 19 November 1969
•Apollo 14 landed 5 February 1971
•Apollo 15 landed 30 July 1971
•Apollo 16 landed 20 April 1972
•Apollo 17 landed 11 December 1972


I believe the moon landings happened.....However the OP has stated he does not believe NASA is a trustworthy organisation so I question his selective beliefs???

Huh Huh Huh
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #40 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:33pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:49pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:45pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:42pm:
As this forum becomes cluttered with the detritus of the conspiracy theorists that believe nothing unless it comes to them in a dream or they read it on a website run by a mental patient, it is perhaps time to bring up the single biggest conspiracy theory that forms the litmus test of the legions of tinfoil hat wearers - the moon landings.

Despite massive overwhelming evidence there remains a stubborn small percentage of people - mostly conspiracy theorists - who refuse to believe that man landed on the moon in 1969 and returned there 6 more times for 5 more landings.

So to see who here is a real tinfoil hat wearer or merely dabbling in the insane it is time to see just who believes and who doesn't.

says the climate change denier.

Or are you talking about armpit? Wink


so do you believe in the moon landings or not?

Yes I believe the moon was landed on.


But what makes you an authority when you believe climate change is a global conspiracy?

Or that asylum seekers are all terrorists trying to spread sharia law?

Or better still, that tony is doing a good job?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #41 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:33pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:45pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:40pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
Its time wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:44pm:
This will last about an hour in the completely wrong forum.


it is actually in the RIGHT place. It speaks to the calibre of people who post in this forum.  but you are probably right. The moderators are next to useless and moving threads around from popular forums to unknown ones is one of the few things they ever do.

so do you believe in the moon landings?


If we are getting into people whacky beliefs, I wonder how many believe in a personal saviour, hell, heaven, praying and all that other nonsense.

Where do you sit with with that longweekend? Are you a loon? Do you believe the theory that god came to earth as a man?

No, I don't believe the moon landing was faked.
No, I don't believe the other lunacy I posted above either. How about you?


if you want a thread on that then start one.  but this is about the moon landings and how to identify a card-carrying tinfoil hat wearee.


i thought this thread was about tin foil hat theories? Or are only the ones you deem worthy of ridicule to be discussed?  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For Warcrimes.
Reply #42 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:36pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:27pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:16pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:09pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
What of the different direction of the shadows?



I answered your first question but I'm not going to run through every question you have. Google it. There should be hundreds of reputable sites that go through them all.
Try this for a start: http://science.howstuffworks.com/moon-landing-hoax.htm



There has not been a logical answer supplied.
Thats why I suspect the first moon landing was faked.

I don't religiously believe something just because the mass of people do. Do you?


My guess would be optical illusion due to the lay of the land but I'll go search for you and edit this post in a minute.

edit: http://space.about.com/od/frequentlyaskedquestions/tp/LunarLandingHoax.htm
Quote:
5. Why Do The Shadows Point In Different Directions?

Image Credit: NASA
In some of the photos, shadows for different objects in the images point in different directions. If the Sun is causing the shadows, shouldn't they all point in the same direction? Well, yes and no. They would all point in the same direction if everything was on the same level. This, however was not the case. Because of the uniformly grey terrain of the Moon, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish changes in elevation. However, these changes can influence the apparent direction of shadows for objects in the frame. In this image the shadow of the lander points directly to the right, while the astronauts shadow points down and to the right. This is because the Moons surface is at a slight incline where he is standing.


How could hills cause such large angular differences if it is as you have posted, a slight incline.
In the image above the lunar module’s shadow clearly contradicts that of the rocks in the foreground at almost a 45 degree angle.




Mythbusters did a show on this, maybe you can find it and see?

edit: Here you go I think.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #43 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:36pm
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:33pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:45pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:40pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
Its time wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:44pm:
This will last about an hour in the completely wrong forum.


it is actually in the RIGHT place. It speaks to the calibre of people who post in this forum.  but you are probably right. The moderators are next to useless and moving threads around from popular forums to unknown ones is one of the few things they ever do.

so do you believe in the moon landings?


If we are getting into people whacky beliefs, I wonder how many believe in a personal saviour, hell, heaven, praying and all that other nonsense.

Where do you sit with with that longweekend? Are you a loon? Do you believe the theory that god came to earth as a man?

No, I don't believe the moon landing was faked.
No, I don't believe the other lunacy I posted above either. How about you?


if you want a thread on that then start one.  but this is about the moon landings and how to identify a card-carrying tinfoil hat wearee.


i thought this thread was about tin foil hat theories? Or are only the ones you deem worthy of ridicule to be discussed?  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yes good point, let's discuss setantas point.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For War Crimes.
Reply #44 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:40pm
 
One more question ... until LW crawls out of hiding

Why are all the first moon landing pictures devoid of stars?

Back to top
 

a16_11446551.jpg (30 KB | 42 )
a16_11446551.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #45 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:42pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:40pm:
One more question ... until LW crawls out of hiding

Why are all the first moon landing pictures devoid of stars?



Do you see stars in daylight? Nope. The moon is in direct sunlight and the surface is reflective, it's too bright to see stars.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19597
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For War Crimes.
Reply #46 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:44pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:40pm:
One more question ... until LW crawls out of hiding

Why are all the first moon landing pictures devoid of stars?



Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin did not become famous until after the landing.....Would you have been happier if Elvis lead the mission???

Wink Wink Wink
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #47 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:44pm
 
Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For War Crimes.
Reply #48 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:49pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:44pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:40pm:
One more question ... until LW crawls out of hiding

Why are all the first moon landing pictures devoid of stars?



Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin did not become famous until after the landing.....Would you have been happier if Elvis lead the mission???

Wink Wink Wink



A two year old elvis leading a faked mission ... is your diversion because you can't supply a logical reason why stars can't be seen in any of the faked pictures.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #49 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:52pm
 
NASA could easily displeal the rumours by photographing the remains of the lunar lander.
As we see from the film the bottom portion remains whilst the top half takes the astronaughts back to their rocket.
If its too expensive to re align one of the 100's of satillites that can photograph a number plate from space then give the coordinates so people can grab their telescopes and have a look for themselves.

I personally don't know if they are faked or not and didn't even realise there was debate about it until roughly 10 years ago.

Frankly there are far more important things to worry about, but my solution above is simple, cheap and would dispell the argument in a matter of hours.

Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #50 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:56pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:45pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:40pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
Its time wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:44pm:
This will last about an hour in the completely wrong forum.


it is actually in the RIGHT place. It speaks to the calibre of people who post in this forum.  but you are probably right. The moderators are next to useless and moving threads around from popular forums to unknown ones is one of the few things they ever do.

so do you believe in the moon landings?


If we are getting into people whacky beliefs, I wonder how many believe in a personal saviour, hell, heaven, praying and all that other nonsense.

Where do you sit with with that longweekend? Are you a loon? Do you believe the theory that god came to earth as a man?

No, I don't believe the moon landing was faked.
No, I don't believe the other lunacy I posted above either. How about you?


if you want a thread on that then start one.  but this is about the moon landings and how to identify a card-carrying tinfoil hat wearee.

Setanta has a very valid point, you claim only tin foil hat wearers don't believe in the moon landing yet you are on record as believing in fairies in the sky. Did you see them when you flew to the moon, longy? Shocked
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19597
Perth
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #51 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 8:48pm
 
I think someone mentioned mythbusters did a series on the moon landing.....

http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #52 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:07pm
 
Yes. Longy has an invisible magical friend. Now who is the loony?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Greenslime is an ignoramus
Reply #53 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:09pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm:
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.

a. solar radiation
b. bake beans for breakfast
c. a hoax moon landing



its quite simple you dumb ignoramus.  they had to hit the flag into the surface which was hard.  then the flagpole and flag vibrated which in a vacuum looks like waving. the behaviour is actually a PROOF that it was in a vacuum.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: Greenslime is an ignoramus
Reply #54 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:12pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:09pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm:
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.

a. solar radiation
b. bake beans for breakfast
c. a hoax moon landing



its quite simple you dumb ignoramus.  they had to hit the flag into the surface which was hard.  then the flagpole and flag vibrated which in a vacuum looks like waving. the behaviour is actually a PROOF that it was in a vacuum.

LOL I bet you longy googled that. Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Greenslime is an ignoramus
Reply #55 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:14pm
 
skippy. wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:12pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:09pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm:
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.

a. solar radiation
b. bake beans for breakfast
c. a hoax moon landing



its quite simple you dumb ignoramus.  they had to hit the flag into the surface which was hard.  then the flagpole and flag vibrated which in a vacuum looks like waving. the behaviour is actually a PROOF that it was in a vacuum.

LOL I bet you longy googled that. Grin Grin Grin


Or he asked Jebus! Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Contacts Ebola
Reply #56 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:14pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 8:48pm:
I think someone mentioned mythbusters did a series on the moon landing.....

http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing



a post from Phil's link

Quote:
Matt says:
You realize you used NASA’s vacuum which is the only way to replicate the moon floor, and you used NASA’s technology that replicates the gravity with ZERO G. You pretty much just proved what they could have used to fake it. How do you know they didn’t make a moon set on a Zero G plane. Then used the space suits in their vacuum with the flag…learn to think outside your closed views.

You mythbusters are such idiots, you are so narrow minded and believe everything that you see. You realize just because something is on the moon, doesn’t mean we took it up their by hand. Busted my ass, they could have easily sent that equipment up there, just like they send satellites.

Not to mention if we really had other equipment up there, why aren’t there pictures of the moon in detail or video? We can see into the beginning of time, but we have no photos of the moon or any video that shows any section as clear as my house.

I would have believed you more if you had that telescope take a picture of the equipment on the moon, cause for all you know, there is a satellite intercepting your moon coordinates and feeding you the information you want to see.

I don’t believe in any side cause I am a scientist, but I am also not dumb enough to fall for your “busted” moon landing, cause you only proved your dumb “situations”, when the answers are always in front of you.

Why don’t you do a video on how they could have used what used to fake it?? I mean you were able to replicate everything they did using their technology, so why don’t you do real science for once, and not this fake crap that is not even entertaining.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Jailed For War Crimes.
Reply #57 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:15pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:40pm:
One more question ... until LW crawls out of hiding

Why are all the first moon landing pictures devoid of stars?



some of us have social lives.  the reason there were no stars was

1) it was DAYTIME on the moon.  do u see starts on earth in daytime
2) no camera of any kind can capture stars on film except with extremely long (30min) exposures.  all those movies showing stars have them digitally added in afterwards

Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Greenslime is an ignoramus
Reply #58 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:16pm
 
skippy. wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:12pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:09pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:46pm:
Question One

When the hoax moon landing was aired on TV live,  the flag was waving in the air. How was this achieved when the Moon has no atmosphere and so no wind.

a. solar radiation
b. bake beans for breakfast
c. a hoax moon landing



its quite simple you dumb ignoramus.  they had to hit the flag into the surface which was hard.  then the flagpole and flag vibrated which in a vacuum looks like waving. the behaviour is actually a PROOF that it was in a vacuum.

LOL I bet you longy googled that. Grin Grin Grin


school science would have answered it.  which is why green-slime doesn't get it.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Contacts Ebola
Reply #59 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:18pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:14pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 8:48pm:
I think someone mentioned mythbusters did a series on the moon landing.....

http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing



a post from Phil's link

Quote:
Matt says:
You realize you used NASA’s vacuum which is the only way to replicate the moon floor, and you used NASA’s technology that replicates the gravity with ZERO G. You pretty much just proved what they could have used to fake it. How do you know they didn’t make a moon set on a Zero G plane. Then used the space suits in their vacuum with the flag…learn to think outside your closed views.

You mythbusters are such idiots, you are so narrow minded and believe everything that you see. You realize just because something is on the moon, doesn’t mean we took it up their by hand. Busted my ass, they could have easily sent that equipment up there, just like they send satellites.

Not to mention if we really had other equipment up there, why aren’t there pictures of the moon in detail or video? We can see into the beginning of time, but we have no photos of the moon or any video that shows any section as clear as my house.

I would have believed you more if you had that telescope take a picture of the equipment on the moon, cause for all you know, there is a satellite intercepting your moon coordinates and feeding you the information you want to see.

I don’t believe in any side cause I am a scientist, but I am also not dumb enough to fall for your “busted” moon landing, cause you only proved your dumb “situations”, when the answers are always in front of you.

Why don’t you do a video on how they could have used what used to fake it?? I mean you were able to replicate everything they did using their technology, so why don’t you do real science for once, and not this fake crap that is not even entertaining.


must be a bit of a bummer for gooses like this clown when multiple moon satellites have sent back actual pictures of the landing sites.  how do they explain away THAT evidence?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Contacts Ebola
Reply #60 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:20pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:14pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 8:48pm:
I think someone mentioned mythbusters did a series on the moon landing.....

http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing



a post from Phil's link

Quote:
Matt says:
You realize you used NASA’s vacuum which is the only way to replicate the moon floor, and you used NASA’s technology that replicates the gravity with ZERO G. You pretty much just proved what they could have used to fake it. How do you know they didn’t make a moon set on a Zero G plane. Then used the space suits in their vacuum with the flag…learn to think outside your closed views.

You mythbusters are such idiots, you are so narrow minded and believe everything that you see. You realize just because something is on the moon, doesn’t mean we took it up their by hand. Busted my ass, they could have easily sent that equipment up there, just like they send satellites.

Not to mention if we really had other equipment up there, why aren’t there pictures of the moon in detail or video? We can see into the beginning of time, but we have no photos of the moon or any video that shows any section as clear as my house.

I would have believed you more if you had that telescope take a picture of the equipment on the moon, cause for all you know, there is a satellite intercepting your moon coordinates and feeding you the information you want to see.

I don’t believe in any side cause I am a scientist, but I am also not dumb enough to fall for your “busted” moon landing, cause you only proved your dumb “situations”, when the answers are always in front of you.

Why don’t you do a video on how they could have used what used to fake it?? I mean you were able to replicate everything they did using their technology, so why don’t you do real science for once, and not this fake crap that is not even entertaining.


How would they fit this shot on a zero g plane?

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Contacts Ebola
Reply #61 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:25pm
 
The Van Allen Radiation Belt


In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place.


How do you fake radiation poisoning ... by pretending the radiation both directions doesn't effect humans.
Back to top
 

belt.jpg (37 KB | 36 )
belt.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: Abbott Jailed For War Crimes.
Reply #62 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:25pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:49pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:44pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:40pm:
One more question ... until LW crawls out of hiding

Why are all the first moon landing pictures devoid of stars?



Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin did not become famous until after the landing.....Would you have been happier if Elvis lead the mission???

Wink Wink Wink



A two year old elvis leading a faked mission ... is your diversion because you can't supply a logical reason why stars can't be seen in any of the faked pictures.


Elvis would have been 34, not 2.  Tongue
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:30pm by Kat »  

28279-4014a.jpg (83 KB | 41 )
28279-4014a.jpg

...
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott A War Criminal
Reply #63 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:29pm
 
...
Back to top
 

aulishite-1.jpg (99 KB | 41 )
aulishite-1.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Contacts Ebola
Reply #64 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:31pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:25pm:
The Van Allen Radiation Belt


In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place.


How do you fake radiation poisoning ... by pretending the radiation both directions doesn't effect humans.


Quote:
1. The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt and galactic ambient radiation (see radiation poisoning and health threat from cosmic rays). Some conspiracists have suggested that Starfish Prime (a high-altitude nuclear test in 1962) was a failed attempt to disrupt the Van Allen belts.
There are two main Van Allen belts - the inner belt and the outer belt - and a transient third belt.[104] The inner belt is the more dangerous one, containing energetic protons. The outer one has less-dangerous low-energy electrons (Beta particles).[105][106] The Apollo spacecraft passed through the inner belt in a matter of minutes and the outer belt in about 1 1⁄2 hours.[106] The astronauts were shielded from the ionizing radiation by the aluminum hulls of the spacecraft.[106][107] Furthermore, the orbital transfer trajectory from Earth to the Moon through the belts was chosen to lessen radiation exposure.[107] Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too harmful for the Apollo missions.[108] Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem (10 mSv), which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.[109] The spacecraft passed through the intense inner belt and the low-energy outer belt. The total radiation received on the trip was about the same as allowed for workers in the nuclear energy field for a year[106][110] and not much more than what Space Shuttle astronauts received.[105]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

Don't like wiki? Click the links at the bottom of the article.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lionel Edriess
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1932
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #65 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:33pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


Interesting point of view.

Lessee now - the 'purported' landing was in 1969 and personal 'computers' arrived ten years later.

So, yes, you're probably right. This day and age, it probably couldn't be replicated - using the technology of the day.

Big 'nads those boys had.

Back to top
 

Toughen up, Australia!
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #66 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:46pm
 
ok so now that we've proven the moon landing was real can we concentrate on Jebus?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:52pm by sir prince duke alevine »  

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #67 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:49pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
ok do now that we've proven the moon landing was real can we concentrate on Jebus?

Grin
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #68 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:50pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
ok do now that we've proven the moon landing was real can we concentrate on Jebus?


Longy might not like that in his thread. Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #69 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:55pm
 
I will kick it off for longy then

Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:13pm by Its time »  
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #70 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:57pm
 
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:50pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
ok do now that we've proven the moon landing was real can we concentrate on Jebus?


Longy might not like that in his thread. Grin


even more reason to concentrate on Jebus  Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #71 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:03pm
 
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:50pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
ok do now that we've proven the moon landing was real can we concentrate on Jebus?


Longy might not like that in his thread. Grin

tough for him.

Ok, I'll go first: I believe Jebus existed as a guy who liked to get drunk and tell stories about how people ought to live their life. He was probably a hippy, hence he thought he could turn water into wine.

Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #72 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:03pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:03pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:50pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
ok do now that we've proven the moon landing was real can we concentrate on Jebus?


Longy might not like that in his thread. Grin

tough for him.

Ok, I'll go first: I believe Jebus existed as a guy who liked to get drunk and tell stories about how people ought to live their life. He was probably a hippy, hence he thought he could turn water into wine.



actually, sounds a little like longie.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Has Ebola
Reply #73 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:13pm
 
Jesus was a homosexual who hung out with men.

Isn't that right long wind
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #74 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:15pm
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:03pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:03pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:50pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
ok do now that we've proven the moon landing was real can we concentrate on Jebus?


Longy might not like that in his thread. Grin

tough for him.

Ok, I'll go first: I believe Jebus existed as a guy who liked to get drunk and tell stories about how people ought to live their life. He was probably a hippy, hence he thought he could turn water into wine.



actually, sounds a little like longie.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yes, all except longie can't walk on water.  But he's trying to learn.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #75 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:25pm
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #76 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:58pm
 
Its time wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:25pm:

wait.... hogwarts isn't real? Wink
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Carl D
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8361
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #77 - Aug 12th, 2014 at 11:59pm
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:52pm:
NASA could easily displeal the rumours by photographing the remains of the lunar lander.
As we see from the film the bottom portion remains whilst the top half takes the astronaughts back to their rocket.
If its too expensive to re align one of the 100's of satillites that can photograph a number plate from space then give the coordinates so people can grab their telescopes and have a look for themselves.

I personally don't know if they are faked or not and didn't even realise there was debate about it until roughly 10 years ago.

Frankly there are far more important things to worry about, but my solution above is simple, cheap and would dispell the argument in a matter of hours.



From my previous post (#29):

http://greekgeek.squidoo.com/apollo-moon-landing-photos-from-space

Smiley

Oh, and it would be impossible, even with the largest currently available telescope, to see the descent stages of the Apollo lunar modules on the moon's surface from Earth.

Even the Hubble Space Telescope in earth orbit can't see them due to the huge distance involved (nearly 400,000 km).

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/08/12/moon-hoax-why-not-use-...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:22am by Carl D »  

"Masks are sand in the gears of the economy" - some f-wit pollie or big business CEO.
 
IP Logged
 
Emma
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #78 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:21am
 
I've voted and read a few of the early posts...  Grin Grin Grin Grin  Hilarious. 

I remember the footage .. I was alive then...

to suggest it is a hoax is just ,, . well what can I say...  ??   Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy

?? Can't believe we're on pg what?? 

Back to top
 

live every day
 
IP Logged
 
Carl D
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8361
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #79 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:34am
 
I think the Moon landing hoax believers definitely increased in number following the release of the movie Capricorn One in 1977.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capricorn_One

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if some of the disbelievers have confused fact with fiction so much that they 'remember' Capricorn One as the actual Moon landings (even though the movie was about a mission to Mars). Roll Eyes

(Excellent movie, by the way. I have it on DVD) Cool
Back to top
 

"Masks are sand in the gears of the economy" - some f-wit pollie or big business CEO.
 
IP Logged
 
Taipan
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1091
SouthWest Sydney
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #80 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 4:22am
 
The Lemming Litmus Test

Do you believe in the official government version on the events of 9/11?

Did the holocaust actually happen?

Did Dr. David Kelly really commit suicide?

Answer yes to the above questions and you're a lemming coincidence theorist who believes everything and anything the televised media tells you and wont believe anything unless the talking heads on tv says it happened.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Contacts Ebola
Reply #81 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 8:27am
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:25pm:
The Van Allen Radiation Belt


In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place.


How do you fake radiation poisoning ... by pretending the radiation both directions doesn't effect humans.


and now you understand why no astronaut went TWICE - to avoid excessive exposure to radiation.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #82 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 8:30am
 
Taipan wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 4:22am:
The Lemming Litmus Test

Do you believe in the official government version on the events of 9/11?

Did the holocaust actually happen?

Did Dr. David Kelly really commit suicide?

Answer yes to the above questions and you're a lemming coincidence theorist who believes everything and anything the televised media tells you and wont believe anything unless the talking heads on tv says it happened.



and I will bet you don't believe in the moon landings either!  right?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The Bible Was Faked.
Reply #83 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 8:55am
 
Radio waves travel at the speed of light.  Any live communication with the earth, between Apollo 11 and Houston, would have to have the precise Earth-Moon delay in the conversations.  No problem, I thought.  Just listen, measure, and compare.
If this is the definitive live record -



We have this -

“Columbia, Columbia, this is Houston, AOS, over.”
[1.07 second pause]

“Houston, Columbia…”

The pause ought to be 2.51 seconds – minimum.  That’s 1.258 seconds for the message to go out, and 1.258 for it to come back, if the astronaut replied instantly.  If both Houston (H) and Columbia (C) spoke instantly, and both continually spoke without interrupting each other, you would see a pattern, if recorded on earth, like this:

CH—CH—CH—

A pause of 1.07 seconds would be a distance between Earth and Columbia of 159,965 kilometers, or 42% of the journey to the moon.  Had Columbia begun her reply in order for the message to arrive at the time recorded in this record, she would have had to start speaking when Houston was saying “Columbia, Columbia.”  But etiquette and standard practice is to wait until the “over”.  When you listen to the record, it sounds like a natural conversation, with everybody saying “over” at the end, to punctuate the communication, wait for the other party to speak.  But the pattern continues.

“I guess you’re about the only person around that doesn’t have TV coverage of the scene.”
[1.07 second pause]

“That’s alright, I don’t mind a bit.”

In order for “That’s alright” to arrive on earth 2.5 seconds after transmission, Columbia would have had to utter it when Houston was speaking the word “doesn’t.”  It would have been like this at the Columbia end:

“I guess you’re about the only person around that doe-That’s alright I don’t mind a bit.”
Talk about completing each others’ sentences!


But what really attracted my attention is that in the “brand new” and “refurbished” NASA video of the same situation, the pauses are the right length.

“I guess you’re about the only person around that doesn’t have TV coverage of the scene.”
[3.37 second pause]

“That’s alright, I don’t mind a bit.”

More, there is an echo-artifact stuck in the middle, in-between “scene” and “That’s alright”.  It’s an
“echo” of “the scene”.  It arrives at a perfect 2.62 seconds after being uttered, exactly the time it would take to moon bounce. It’s “perfect”. Here is the “refurbished” audio, showing the end of the sentence, and the echoed word “scene”.



The problem is that neither the pause nor the echo in the “original” version was there.  The proper signature delay is only there in the “new and improved” version.

http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com.au/2011/12/apollo-moon-hoax-audio-delay-...


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47043
At my desk.
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #84 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 9:48am
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

1. There should have been more than a two-second delay in communications between Earth and the Moon, at a distance of 400,000 km (250,000 mi).

        The round trip light travel time of more than two seconds is apparent in all the real-time recordings of the lunar audio, but this does not always appear as expected. There may also be some documentary films where the delay has been edited out. Reasons for editing the audio may be time constraints or in the interest of clarity.[130]
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #85 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 9:52am
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:15pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:03pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 10:03pm:
Setanta wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:50pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
ok do now that we've proven the moon landing was real can we concentrate on Jebus?


Longy might not like that in his thread. Grin

tough for him.

Ok, I'll go first: I believe Jebus existed as a guy who liked to get drunk and tell stories about how people ought to live their life. He was probably a hippy, hence he thought he could turn water into wine.



actually, sounds a little like longie.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yes, all except longie can't walk on water.  But he's trying to learn.


he'd never admit it.  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #86 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:13am
 
freediver wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 9:48am:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

1. There should have been more than a two-second delay in communications between Earth and the Moon, at a distance of 400,000 km (250,000 mi).

        The round trip light travel time of more than two seconds is apparent in all the real-time recordings of the lunar audio, but this does not always appear as expected. There may also be some documentary films where the delay has been edited out. Reasons for editing the audio may be time constraints or in the interest of clarity.[130]


the other reason is that people hear recordings MADE ON EARTH of communications and of course there is no delay between the astronauts speaking and Control replying. what you DONT hear is control speaking and the astronauts replying immediately.

basic really.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57063
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #87 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #88 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:25am
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


You mean other than Apollos 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17???
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Carl D
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8361
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #89 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:40am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:25am:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


You mean other than Apollos 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17???


Grin

Exactly.

Why would NASA fake the Apollo 11 moon landing and then follow up with 5 more fakes (would have been 6 if the Apollo 13 mission hadn't been aborted)?

Mind you, I've heard some tinfoil hat types say that only the Apollo 11 landing was faked (to beat the Russians to the moon) and the rest were real. Roll Eyes

Even if that were true (and I don't believe for one minute that it is), then it still proves man landed on the moon at least 5 times.
Back to top
 

"Masks are sand in the gears of the economy" - some f-wit pollie or big business CEO.
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #90 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:57am
 
Carl D wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:40am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:25am:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


You mean other than Apollos 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17???


Grin

Exactly.

Why would NASA fake the Apollo 11 moon landing and then follow up with 5 more fakes (would have been 6 if the Apollo 13 mission hadn't been aborted)?

Mind you, I've heard some tinfoil hat types say that only the Apollo 11 landing was faked (to beat the Russians to the moon) and the rest were real. Roll Eyes

Even if that were true (and I don't believe for one minute that it is), then it still proves man landed on the moon at least 5 times.


Then why didn't the Russians of the time, make the claim that Apollo 11 was fake??
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #91 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:03am
 
Carl D wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:40am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:25am:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


You mean other than Apollos 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17???


Grin

Exactly.

Why would NASA fake the Apollo 11 moon landing and then follow up with 5 more fakes (would have been 6 if the Apollo 13 mission hadn't been aborted)?

Mind you, I've heard some tinfoil hat types say that only the Apollo 11 landing was faked (to beat the Russians to the moon) and the rest were real. Roll Eyes

Even if that were true (and I don't believe for one minute that it is), then it still proves man landed on the moon at least 5 times.


the argument that defeats that is that the Russians were years - perhaps as many as ten years - behind the americans and everyone knew it. The Russians never went to the moon and never had a viable program that was ever going to get there.  the yanks wanted it done in the 60s to fulfil Kennedys promise.  And they did it.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #92 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:04am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:57am:
Carl D wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:40am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:25am:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


You mean other than Apollos 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17???


Grin

Exactly.

Why would NASA fake the Apollo 11 moon landing and then follow up with 5 more fakes (would have been 6 if the Apollo 13 mission hadn't been aborted)?

Mind you, I've heard some tinfoil hat types say that only the Apollo 11 landing was faked (to beat the Russians to the moon) and the rest were real. Roll Eyes

Even if that were true (and I don't believe for one minute that it is), then it still proves man landed on the moon at least 5 times.


Then why didn't the Russians of the time, make the claim that Apollo 11 was fake??



the Russians had every motivation in the world to reveal a fake as well as the technology to prove it, but they didn't.  That is a powerful argument for the truth of the landings although the best are now the actual photos of the landing sites by moon orbiters.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #93 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:53am
 
sooooo...on reaching the moon was there any mention of seeing heaven and the big santa-look-a-like guy?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #94 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:57am
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:53am:
sooooo...on reaching the moon was there any mention of seeing heaven and the big santa-look-a-like guy? 


You can ask Buzz Aldrin, but you may not like how he reacts.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #95 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:07pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:57am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:53am:
sooooo...on reaching the moon was there any mention of seeing heaven and the big santa-look-a-like guy? 


You can ask Buzz Aldrin, but you may not like how he reacts.

That may be a bit hard given I don't know Buzz, nor anyone who may know Buzz (as far as I'm aware).

But surely such an event as seeing the trillions of souls partying up in the cloud would have been reported, had it been seen?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
George_Orhell
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 445
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #96 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:16pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


...
Back to top
 

Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting,
"Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!"
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #97 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:17pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:07pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:57am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:53am:
sooooo...on reaching the moon was there any mention of seeing heaven and the big santa-look-a-like guy? 


You can ask Buzz Aldrin, but you may not like how he reacts.

That may be a bit hard given I don't know Buzz, nor anyone who may know Buzz (as far as I'm aware).

But surely such an event as seeing the trillions of souls partying up in the cloud would have been reported, had it been seen? 


Don't think the partying in the clouds bit has been reported, although I think some of the astronauts did describe the journey as 'a religious experience'.

Of course, you could always send him an email or a letter (perhaps care of NASA?)
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #98 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:36pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:07pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:57am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:53am:
sooooo...on reaching the moon was there any mention of seeing heaven and the big santa-look-a-like guy? 


You can ask Buzz Aldrin, but you may not like how he reacts.

That may be a bit hard given I don't know Buzz, nor anyone who may know Buzz (as far as I'm aware).

But surely such an event as seeing the trillions of souls partying up in the cloud would have been reported, had it been seen? 


Don't think the partying in the clouds bit has been reported, although I think some of the astronauts did describe the journey as 'a religious experience'.

Of course, you could always send him an email or a letter (perhaps care of NASA?)

you think they saw the big hairy fella?   Shocked
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #99 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 1:19pm
 
George_Orhell wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:16pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


http://s25.postimg.org/ad6imorr3/635289901683474787tumblir_person.gif



Quite. Its not that it can't be replicated, its that its too costly to replicate. Theres no point now going back to the moon unless its with the express purpose of colonization.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #100 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 1:48pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:36pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:07pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:57am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:53am:
sooooo...on reaching the moon was there any mention of seeing heaven and the big santa-look-a-like guy? 


You can ask Buzz Aldrin, but you may not like how he reacts.

That may be a bit hard given I don't know Buzz, nor anyone who may know Buzz (as far as I'm aware).

But surely such an event as seeing the trillions of souls partying up in the cloud would have been reported, had it been seen? 


Don't think the partying in the clouds bit has been reported, although I think some of the astronauts did describe the journey as 'a religious experience'.

Of course, you could always send him an email or a letter (perhaps care of NASA?)

you think they saw the big hairy fella?   Shocked


If you mean Bigfoot, doubt it. If you mean God or gods, then no absolutely not. (unless they spotted Bifrost)
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #101 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 2:53pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:28pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 6:24pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


Spoken like a true Commie!



Democratic socialist actually. Considered being a communist when I was around nine and decided not for me

Around 9 eh? Grin Grin Grin
Oh my you are advanced.
Here I was thinking dementia set in at a much later age. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #102 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:08pm
 

Even in The Big Bang Theory they have mentioned this one. Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #103 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:09pm
 
The fact that 6 people so far don't believe or aren't sure is a worry.  I'm assuming we let them vote too.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #104 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:29pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:07pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:57am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:53am:
sooooo...on reaching the moon was there any mention of seeing heaven and the big santa-look-a-like guy? 


You can ask Buzz Aldrin, but you may not like how he reacts.

That may be a bit hard given I don't know Buzz, nor anyone who may know Buzz (as far as I'm aware).

But surely such an event as seeing the trillions of souls partying up in the cloud would have been reported, had it been seen? 


Don't think the partying in the clouds bit has been reported, although I think some of the astronauts did describe the journey as 'a religious experience'.

Of course, you could always send him an email or a letter (perhaps care of NASA?)


a number of astronauts became Christians after the landings.  maybe there is a clue there for you.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #105 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:39pm
 
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:09pm:
The fact that 6 people so far don't believe or aren't sure is a worry.  I'm assuming we let them vote too.  Roll Eyes



it is a perfect thread actually.  the truly weird and stupid on here almost to a man disbelieve in the moon-landings. the conspiracy theorists who take it to this level can and should be totally ignored as it is reflected in everything else they say,  the moon-landings are the perfect litmus test for a mentally-damaged conspiracy theorist because it can be comprehensively proven, yet still some cannot believe.  but alien? Reptilians? Illunminati and the rest? no problem
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott Announces Political Retirement.
Reply #106 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:18pm
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 1:19pm:
George_Orhell wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 12:16pm:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Wrong forum.

And my personal view is that the original moon landing was faked so the commies couldn't get there first and punch a massive blow against the greedy capitalists.

If it wasn't faked then how come it can't be replicated with the same material and knowledge base.


http://s25.postimg.org/ad6imorr3/635289901683474787tumblir_person.gif



Quite. Its not that it can't be replicated, its that its too costly to replicate. Theres no point now going back to the moon unless its with the express purpose of colonization.

They've given up on the 'moonrock' for fusion have they?
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #107 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:25pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Given that there is gravity on the moon doesn't that imply that there is some atmosphere by definition?

..further, because there are no trees this atmosphere and it's associated winds should be allowed to pick up a momentum of some kind...

(I'm obviously speculating  Huh Huh)
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #108 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:26pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:39pm:
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:09pm:
The fact that 6 people so far don't believe or aren't sure is a worry.  I'm assuming we let them vote too.  Roll Eyes



it is a perfect thread actually.  the truly weird and stupid on here almost to a man disbelieve in the moon-landings. the conspiracy theorists who take it to this level can and should be totally ignored as it is reflected in everything else they say,  the moon-landings are the perfect litmus test for a mentally-damaged conspiracy theorist because it can be comprehensively proven, yet still some cannot believe.  but alien? Reptilians? Illunminati and the rest? no problem


Ah, so those who believe are not weird or stupid simply because they accept that the landing was genuine!  I get it now.  As the Title suggests, melielingtime has invented the ultimate and absolute in deciding matters of stupidity right across every subject which exists on this Planet.  Very clever, melielingtime.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #109 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:40pm
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:25pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Given that there is gravity on the moon doesn't that imply that there is some atmosphere by definition?

..further, because there are no trees this atmosphere and it's associated winds should be allowed to pick up a momentum of some kind...

(I'm obviously speculating  Huh Huh)



more likely you are masturbating.  you certainly aren't thinking.  there is no atmosphere on the moon. it is a total vacuum.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #110 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:41pm
 
Aussie wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:26pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:39pm:
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:09pm:
The fact that 6 people so far don't believe or aren't sure is a worry.  I'm assuming we let them vote too.  Roll Eyes



it is a perfect thread actually.  the truly weird and stupid on here almost to a man disbelieve in the moon-landings. the conspiracy theorists who take it to this level can and should be totally ignored as it is reflected in everything else they say,  the moon-landings are the perfect litmus test for a mentally-damaged conspiracy theorist because it can be comprehensively proven, yet still some cannot believe.  but alien? Reptilians? Illunminati and the rest? no problem


Ah, so those who believe are not weird or stupid simply because they accept that the landing was genuine!  I get it now.  As the Title suggests, melielingtime has invented the ultimate and absolute in deciding matters of stupidity right across every subject which exists on this Planet.  Very clever, melielingtime.


for a supposed lawyer you clearly have an appalling grasp of basic logic.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #111 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 6:00pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:40pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:25pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Given that there is gravity on the moon doesn't that imply that there is some atmosphere by definition?

..further, because there are no trees this atmosphere and it's associated winds should be allowed to pick up a momentum of some kind...

(I'm obviously speculating  Huh Huh)



more likely you are masturbating.  you certainly aren't thinking.  there is no atmosphere on the moon. it is a total vacuum.

There is no such thing as a total vacuum!
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #112 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 6:06pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:40pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:25pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Given that there is gravity on the moon doesn't that imply that there is some atmosphere by definition?

..further, because there are no trees this atmosphere and it's associated winds should be allowed to pick up a momentum of some kind...

(I'm obviously speculating  Huh Huh)



more likely you are masturbating.  you certainly aren't thinking.  there is no atmosphere on the moon. it is a total vacuum.

there is indeed an atmosphere on the moon.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13988
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #113 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 6:12pm
 
Good thread ...

The FUNNIEST
conspiracy theory
I ever heard, was that the moon landing was directed and filmed by
Stanley Kubrick
- as a side project - during the making of
2001: A Space Odyssey




Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #114 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 7:07pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 6:12pm:
Good thread ...

The FUNNIEST
conspiracy theory
I ever heard, was that the moon landing was directed and filmed by
Stanley Kubrick
- as a side project - during the making of
2001: A Space Odyssey




Hadn't heard that one before. That's a pearla.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Gay Jesus Loves You
Reply #115 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 7:46pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:39pm:
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:09pm:
The fact that 6 people so far don't believe or aren't sure is a worry.  I'm assuming we let them vote too.  Roll Eyes



it is a perfect thread actually.  the truly weird and stupid on here almost to a man disbelieve in the moon-landings. the conspiracy theorists who take it to this level can and should be totally ignored as it is reflected in everything else they say,  the moon-landings are the perfect litmus test for a mentally-damaged conspiracy theorist because it can be comprehensively proven, yet still some cannot believe.  but alien? Reptilians? Illunminati and the rest? no problem



On what basis do you argue this. You have not comprehensively proven anything.
All you have done is made sweeping statements and thrown your own dung.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Gay Jesus Loves You
Reply #116 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 7:50pm
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:25pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Given that there is gravity on the moon doesn't that imply that there is some atmosphere by definition?

..further, because there are no trees this atmosphere and it's associated winds should be allowed to pick up a momentum of some kind...

(I'm obviously speculating  Huh Huh)



Gravity of the moon is apx. 1/6th of earth
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Gay Jesus Loves You
Reply #117 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 9:15pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 7:50pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:25pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Given that there is gravity on the moon doesn't that imply that there is some atmosphere by definition?

..further, because there are no trees this atmosphere and it's associated winds should be allowed to pick up a momentum of some kind...

(I'm obviously speculating  Huh Huh)



Gravity of the moon is apx. 1/6th of earth

They used to say 1/10th didn't they?
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #118 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:53pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:39pm:
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:09pm:
The fact that 6 people so far don't believe or aren't sure is a worry.  I'm assuming we let them vote too.  Roll Eyes



it is a perfect thread actually.  the truly weird and stupid on here almost to a man disbelieve in the moon-landings. the conspiracy theorists who take it to this level can and should be totally ignored as it is reflected in everything else they say,  the moon-landings are the perfect litmus test for a mentally-damaged conspiracy theorist because it can be comprehensively proven, yet still some cannot believe.  but alien? Reptilians? Illunminati and the rest? no problem

I call them
CONSPIRANUTS!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #119 - Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:02pm
 
Lunar atmosphere...

Quote:
Until recently, most everyone accepted the conventional wisdom that the moon has virtually no atmosphere. Just as the discovery of water on the moon transformed our textbook knowledge of Earth's nearest celestial neighbor, recent studies confirm that our moon does indeed have an atmosphere consisting of some unusual gases, including sodium and potassium, which are not found in the atmospheres of Earth, Mars or Venus. It's an infinitesimal amount of air when compared to Earth's atmosphere. At sea level on Earth, we breathe in an atmosphere where each cubic centimeter contains 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules; by comparison the lunar atmosphere has less than 1,000,000 molecules in the same volume. That still sounds like a lot, but it is what we consider to be a very good vacuum on Earth. In fact, the density of the atmosphere at the moon's surface is comparable to the density of the outermost fringes of Earth's atmosphere where the International Space Station orbits.



http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LADEE/news/lunar-atmosphere.html#.U-tgYkbtZXY

Lunar gravity...
varies believe it or not but averages...
1.622 m/s²
As a measurement of weight an object on the Moon averages at 1/6th that of its weight on the Earth.
I've never heard of it being 1/10th.


Oh almost forgot...  and we know these things because we've been there.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #120 - Aug 14th, 2014 at 1:39am
 
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:53pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:39pm:
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 3:09pm:
The fact that 6 people so far don't believe or aren't sure is a worry.  I'm assuming we let them vote too.  Roll Eyes



it is a perfect thread actually.  the truly weird and stupid on here almost to a man disbelieve in the moon-landings. the conspiracy theorists who take it to this level can and should be totally ignored as it is reflected in everything else they say,  the moon-landings are the perfect litmus test for a mentally-damaged conspiracy theorist because it can be comprehensively proven, yet still some cannot believe.  but alien? Reptilians? Illunminati and the rest? no problem

I call them
CONSPIRANUTS!!!

I call him CONSPIRATOR

...
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #121 - Aug 14th, 2014 at 1:39am
 
Nah. Don't need to go there to know that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #122 - Aug 14th, 2014 at 1:41am
 
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:02pm:
Lunar atmosphere...

Quote:
Until recently, most everyone accepted the conventional wisdom that the moon has virtually no atmosphere. Just as the discovery of water on the moon transformed our textbook knowledge of Earth's nearest celestial neighbor, recent studies confirm that our moon does indeed have an atmosphere consisting of some unusual gases, including sodium and potassium, which are not found in the atmospheres of Earth, Mars or Venus. It's an infinitesimal amount of air when compared to Earth's atmosphere. At sea level on Earth, we breathe in an atmosphere where each cubic centimeter contains 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules; by comparison the lunar atmosphere has less than 1,000,000 molecules in the same volume. That still sounds like a lot, but it is what we consider to be a very good vacuum on Earth. In fact, the density of the atmosphere at the moon's surface is comparable to the density of the outermost fringes of Earth's atmosphere where the International Space Station orbits.



http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LADEE/news/lunar-atmosphere.html#.U-tgYkbtZXY

Lunar gravity...
varies believe it or not but averages...
1.622 m/s²
As a measurement of weight an object on the Moon averages at 1/6th that of its weight on the Earth.
I've never heard of it being 1/10th.


Oh almost forgot...  and we know these things because we've been there.


Don't need to go there to know that dickweed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #123 - Aug 14th, 2014 at 2:31am
 
Amadd wrote on Aug 14th, 2014 at 1:41am:
Grendel wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 11:02pm:
Lunar atmosphere...

Quote:
Until recently, most everyone accepted the conventional wisdom that the moon has virtually no atmosphere. Just as the discovery of water on the moon transformed our textbook knowledge of Earth's nearest celestial neighbor, recent studies confirm that our moon does indeed have an atmosphere consisting of some unusual gases, including sodium and potassium, which are not found in the atmospheres of Earth, Mars or Venus. It's an infinitesimal amount of air when compared to Earth's atmosphere. At sea level on Earth, we breathe in an atmosphere where each cubic centimeter contains 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules; by comparison the lunar atmosphere has less than 1,000,000 molecules in the same volume. That still sounds like a lot, but it is what we consider to be a very good vacuum on Earth. In fact, the density of the atmosphere at the moon's surface is comparable to the density of the outermost fringes of Earth's atmosphere where the International Space Station orbits.



http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LADEE/news/lunar-atmosphere.html#.U-tgYkbtZXY

Lunar gravity...
varies believe it or not but averages...
1.622 m/s²
As a measurement of weight an object on the Moon averages at 1/6th that of its weight on the Earth.
I've never heard of it being 1/10th.


Oh almost forgot...  and we know these things because we've been there.


Don't need to go there to know that dickweed.


Yes, we did, otherwise it'd be a theory (guess)
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #124 - Aug 17th, 2014 at 11:23am
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:45pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 5:42pm:
As this forum becomes cluttered with the detritus of the conspiracy theorists that believe nothing unless it comes to them in a dream or they read it on a website run by a mental patient, it is perhaps time to bring up the single biggest conspiracy theory that forms the litmus test of the legions of tinfoil hat wearers - the moon landings.

Despite massive overwhelming evidence there remains a stubborn small percentage of people - mostly conspiracy theorists - who refuse to believe that man landed on the moon in 1969 and returned there 6 more times for 5 more landings.

So to see who here is a real tinfoil hat wearer or merely dabbling in the insane it is time to see just who believes and who doesn't.

says the climate change denier.

Or are you talking about armpit? Wink


So Longy, you believe that scientists sent us to the moon, but you also believe in a massive global conspiracy among scientists over global warming just so they can get more research grants. 
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Perses
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 239
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #125 - Aug 17th, 2014 at 6:12pm
 
Long wears a tin foil hat every day. were is yer mate shir2lou long ?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 40901
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #126 - Aug 20th, 2014 at 3:38am
 
http://www.tbyil.com/Ebola_Virus_Real_or%20Fake_Threat_Paul_Fassa.htm

Ebola: Genuine Threat or Fake Psyop? - Part 1

by Paul Fassa

...

http://www.tbyil.com/Beat_and_Avoid_the_Swine_Flu_Tony_Isaacs.htm

Beat and Avoid the Swine Flu Without Flu Shots or Tamiflu

by Tony Isaacs
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 20th, 2014 at 3:49am by it_is_the_light »  

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #127 - Aug 20th, 2014 at 10:14am
 
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
What of the different direction of the shadows?



Because the Earth is also a large light source on the moon. The Earth is about 32 times brighter (when seen on the moon) than a full moon is when seen on Earth. The full Moon casts shadows on Earth.

So, having the Earth above the lunar horizon, on one side, and the Sun on the other would produce shadows from two separate directions .
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #128 - Aug 23rd, 2014 at 12:49pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 20th, 2014 at 10:14am:
____ wrote on Aug 12th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
What of the different direction of the shadows?



Because the Earth is also a large light source on the moon. The Earth is about 32 times brighter (when seen on the moon) than a full moon is when seen on Earth. The full Moon casts shadows on Earth.

So, having the Earth above the lunar horizon, on one side, and the Sun on the other would produce shadows from two separate directions .


That would actually produce double shadows.
The real explanation is much more simple. The ground was sloped and a wide angle lens was used which exaggerates perspective.
Explanations for all the dodgy evidence used by moon landing deniers can be found at:

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/iangoddard/moon01.htm
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Freedumb
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1101
WA
Gender: female
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #129 - Aug 30th, 2014 at 10:52pm
 
This poll should also extend to those who take everything they see in the media as a proven fact.

My father thinks the moon landings were faked... but he believes that 9/11 wasn't an inside job, and he's supposedly a "logical thinker".

Back to top
 

Nothing would be what it is,
Because everything would be what it isn't.
And contrary-wise - what it is, it wouldn't be.
And what it wouldn't be, it would.
You see?

- Lewis Carroll
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13988
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #130 - Sep 1st, 2014 at 2:53pm
 
Perses wrote on Aug 17th, 2014 at 6:12pm:
Long wears a tin foil hat every day. were is yer mate shir2lou long ? 




She's joined the IDF - to bomb the crap out of what's left of Palestine




Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
Team Froggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7406
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #131 - Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:13pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:40pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:25pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Given that there is gravity on the moon doesn't that imply that there is some atmosphere by definition?

..further, because there are no trees this atmosphere and it's associated winds should be allowed to pick up a momentum of some kind...

(I'm obviously speculating  Huh Huh)



more likely you are masturbating.  you certainly aren't thinking.  there is no atmosphere on the moon. it is a total vacuum.


Care to apologise to DRAH??

(a)...There IS an atmosphere in the moon.
(b)...There is NO such thing as a "Total Vacuum".

Smiley
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #132 - Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:02am
 
Team Froggie wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:13pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:40pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 5:25pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Given that there is gravity on the moon doesn't that imply that there is some atmosphere by definition?

..further, because there are no trees this atmosphere and it's associated winds should be allowed to pick up a momentum of some kind...

(I'm obviously speculating  Huh Huh)



more likely you are masturbating.  you certainly aren't thinking.  there is no atmosphere on the moon. it is a total vacuum.


Care to apologise to DRAH??

(a)...There IS an atmosphere in the moon.
(b)...There is NO such thing as a "Total Vacuum".

Smiley


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_the_Moon
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #133 - Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:23am
 
Still not strong enough to wave a flag with breeze
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 40901
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #134 - Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:21am
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:23am:
Still not strong enough to wave a flag with breeze


many blessings

your quote is a paradox

for it is a false flag

what came first , the question or the answer ?

namaste

- : ) =
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #135 - Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:33am
 
Yep, more meds for i am the light
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Team Froggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7406
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #136 - Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:49pm
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:23am:
Still not strong enough to wave a flag with breeze


Totally agree.....

Was merely pointing out the obvious error in the post I was referencing.

Wink
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 40901
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: The Tinfoil Hat Litmus Test.
Reply #137 - Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:28am
 
it_is_the_light wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:21am:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:23am:
Still not strong enough to wave a flag with breeze


many blessings

your quote is a paradox

for it is a false flag

what came first , the question or the answer ?

namaste

- : ) =


many blessings ,

the answer is ~ the answer *

namaste

- : ) =
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print